Abstract
The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) is set to have a major impact on every aspect of society. Yet, little understanding has been generated on how women, in particular, may be affected by this technological epoch. Through an intersectional socio-technological theoretical approach, this chapter explores the implications of the 4IR and its associated technologies—specifically artificial intelligence (AI)—on women in South Africa. Preceded by a discussion on the theoretical approach employed here, this chapter is structured in three substantial parts addressing: first, South Africa’s policy position on the 4IR; second, the role of women historically in the development of computer science and global debates on AI and gender bias; and third, how the global experience of women and 4IR-related technologies is and may impact on women in South Africa. The analysis indicates that if advanced 4IR technologies and policies that seek to govern their use and development do not take into account the values and lived experiences of those they will effect, it can result in discrimination and bias, particularly for women. Overall, an intersectional understanding of the way in which gender is implicated by and implicates in turn the design and development of technology must be adopted in South Africa’s policy responses to the 4IR in order not to, proverbially at least, leave anyone behind.
‘This revolution must be harnessed and placed at the disposal of the programme of transformation on which our country embarked in 1994’.
South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa (2019)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, R. (2019a). “Helen A’Loy” and other tales of female automata: A gendered reading of the narratives of hopes and fears of intelligent machines and artificial intelligence. AI and Society, 35, 569–579.
Adams, R. (2019b). The fourth industrial revolution risks leaving women behind. The conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-risks-leaving-women-behind-121216
Adams, R., & Loideain, N. N. (2019). Addressing indirect discrimination and gender stereotypes in AI personal assistants: The role of international human rights law. Cambridge International Law Journal, 8(2), 241–257.
AI for Development. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved from https://ai4d.ai/
AI for Global Sustainable Development. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved from https://ai4good.org/
AI Now. (2018). Discriminating systems: Gender, race and power in AI. Retrieved from https://ainowinstitute.org/discriminatingsystems.pdf
Association for Progressive Communication (APC). (2019). African women face widening technology gap. Retrieved from https://www.apc.org/en/news/african-women-face-widening-technology-gap
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Blackwell, A. (2019). Objective functions: (In)humanity and inequity in artificial intelligence. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 9(1), 137–146.
Clark, W. A. (1986). The LINC was early and small. In Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery: History of the Personal Computer, Jan 9-10 (pp. 133–155).
Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality: As critical social theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Department of Communications and Digital Technologies. (2018). Invitation to nominate candidates for the presidential commission on the fourth industrial revolution (Government Gazette No. 42078). Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201812/42078gen764.pdf
Department of Science and Innovation. (2019). White paper on science, technology and innovation. Retrieved from https://www.dst.gov.za/images/2019/White_paper_web_copyv1.pdf
Dillon, S. (2018). On the influence of literature on science. Configurations, 26(3), 311–316.
European Commission, Independent High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). A definition of artificial intelligence: Main capabilities and disciplines. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines
Gillward, A. (2019). 4IR in SA is too important to remain the domain of the elite. Businesslive. Retrieved from https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2019-07-04-4ir-in-sa-is-too-important-to-remain-the-domain-of-the-elite/
Hicks, M. (2017). Programmed inequality: How Britain discarded women technologists and lost its edge in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart technologies and the end(s) of law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Katzenbach, C., & Bareis, J. (2018). Global AI race: States aiming for the top. Digital society blog. Retrieved from https://www.hiig.de/en/global-ai-race-nations-aiming-for-the-top/
Keyes, O. (2018). The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, November 2018, Article No.: 88. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357
Loideain, N. N., & Adams, R. (2019). From Ava to Siri: The gendering of virtual personal assistants and the role of data protection law. Computer Law and Security Review.
Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Muambe, B. M., & Okello, J. (2013). Technology, sustainability and rural development in Africa. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
National Centre for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Degrees in computer and information sciences conferred by degree-granting institutions, by level of degree and sex of student: 1970-71 through 2010-11. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_349.asp
National Planning Commission. (2013). National development plan 2030. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/issues/national-development-plan-2030
Nkala, T. (2019). 4IR: The good, the bad and the inequality gap. Daily Maverick. Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-07-04-4ir-the-good-the-bad-and-the-inequality-gap/
Pfaffenberger, B. (1988). Fetished objects and humanised nature: Towards an anthropology of technology. Man, New Series, 23(2), 236–252.
Plantinga, P., Adams, R., & Parker, S. (2019). AI technologies for responsive local government in South Africa. In Artificial Intelligence: Human Rights, Social Justice and Development. GIS Watch. Retrieved from https://giswatch.org/sites/default/files/gisw2019_artificial_intelligence.pdf
Ramaphosa, C. (2018). 2018 state of the nation address. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/speeches/president-cyril-ramaphosa-2018-state-nation-address-16-feb-2018-0000
Ramaphosa, C. (2019). Address to the inaugural fourth industrial revolution South Africa Digital Economy Summit. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/speeches/president-cyril-ramaphosa-addresses-inaugural-4th-industrial-revolution-sa-digital-economy
Rothschild, J. A. (1981). A feminist perspective on technology and the future. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 4(1), 65–74.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Shatterly, M. L. (2016). Hidden figures: The American dream and the untold story of the black women mathematicians who helped win the space race. New York, NY: William Morrow.
Stamp, P. (1989). Technology, gender and power in Africa. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Resource Centre. Retrieved from https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/technology-gender-and-power-africa
Statistics South Africa. (2019). Inequality trends in South Africa: A multidimensional diagnostic of inequality. Retrieved from http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-10-19/Report-03-10-192017.pdf
Thompson, C. (2019). The secret history of women in coding. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/13/magazine/women-coding-computer-programming.html
UNESCO. (2019). I’d blush if I could. EQUALS policy paper. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367416
Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.
Weinberg, L. (2019). The rationalization of leisure: Marxist feminism and the fantasy of machine subordination. Laterality, 8(1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adams, R. (2021). The Gendered Impact of Artificial Intelligence and the Fourth Industrial Revolution in South Africa: Inequality, Accessibility and Skills Development. In: Pearson Jr., W., Reddy, V. (eds) Social Justice and Education in the 21st Century. Diversity and Inclusion Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65417-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65417-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65416-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65417-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)