Skip to main content

Anesthesia-Related Considerations in Malpractice Litigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Litigation in Otolaryngology

Abstract

The surgeon must work closely with the anesthesiologist to prevent malpractice litigation and, more importantly, to ensure the best patient outcome. As the otolaryngologist and the anesthesiologist concurrently take care of patients, it is important to consider malpractice liability of both specialties. Overlapping areas of litigation include airway injury, complications related to obstructive sleep apnea, and respiratory complications. Teams can work together on pre-operative optimization and risk screening, management of the difficult airway, postoperative monitoring, and safe analgesic and opioid prescribing practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Svider PF, Husain Q, Kovalerchik O, et al. Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(6):699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Husain Q, et al. Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(7):1754–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ji YD, Dodson TB, Donoff RB, He P. Medical malpractice litigation associated with anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(8):1606–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kent CD, Stephens LS, Posner KL, Domino KB. What adverse events and injuries are cited in anesthesia malpractice claims for nonspine orthopaedic surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(12):2941–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellner DB, Urman RD, Greenberg P, Brovman EY. Analysis of adverse outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit based on anesthesia liability data. J Clin Anesth. 2018;50:48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung SA, Yuan H, Chung F. A systemic review of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(5):1543–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Folbe AJ, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea: strategies for minimizing liability and enhancing patient safety. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(6):947–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodward ZG, Urman RD, Domino KB. Safety of non-operating room anesthesia: a closed claims update. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017;35(4):569–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barinsky, G.L., Pashkova, A. (2021). Anesthesia-Related Considerations in Malpractice Litigation. In: Eloy, J.A., Svider, P.F., Baredes, S., Kelly, S.P. (eds) Litigation in Otolaryngology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64418-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64418-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64417-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64418-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics