Skip to main content

Malpractice in Aesthetic Surgery and Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Litigation in Otolaryngology

Abstract

Surgical and non-surgical procedures are performed for both cosmetic and reconstructive situations in order to optimize the form and function of the face, head, and neck. In modern times, the facial plastic surgeon has become a target of both the patient and attorney, both of whom are hoping for financial gain secondary to a real or perceived fault with the actions of the practitioner. Despite extensive five-year training in Otolaryngology and, in many instances, additional specialized training in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, the threat of medical malpractice looms significantly for facial plastic surgeons. Lack of proper informed consent and poor cosmetic outcome are cited most frequently as the reasons litigation are enacted. Familiarizing oneself with the details and scenarios of medical malpractice and litigation in facial plastic surgery is extremely important for those who practice in the United States today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Svider PF, Keeley BR, Zumba O, Mauro AC, Setzen M, Eloy JA. From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(8):1849–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mello MM, Chandra A, Gawande AA, Studdert DM. National costs of the medical liability system. Health Aff. 2010;29(9):1569–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A. Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(7):629–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberger DA. Physician burnout and well-being: a systematic review and framework for action. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(6):567–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, DesRoches CM, Peugh J, Zapert K, Brennan TA. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2609–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kandinov A, Mutchnick S, Nangia V, Svider PF, Zuliani GF, Shkoukani MA, Carron MA. Analysis of factors associated with rhytidectomy malpractice litigation cases. JAMA Facial Plastic Surg. 2017;19(4):255–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. “Plastic Surgery Statistics.” American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Available at www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics/.

  8. Kumar NG, Hricz N, Drolet BC. Litigation in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):456e–8e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ifeacho SN, Pothier DD. A comparative analysis of the litigation rate against the NHS following rhinoplasty by otorhinolaryngologists and plastic surgeons. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34(2):177–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Svider PF, Blake DM, Husain Q, Mauro AC, Turbin RE, Eloy JA, Langer PD. In the eyes of the law: malpractice litigation in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(2):119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khatri KA, Ross V, Grevelink JM, Magro CM, Anderson RR. Comparison of erbium: YAG and carbon dioxide lasers in resurfacing of facial rhytides. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(4):391–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Svider PF, Carron MA, Zuliani GF, Eloy JA, Setzen M, Folbe AJ. Lasers and losers in the eyes of the law: liability for head and neck procedures. JAMA Facial Plastic Surg. 2014;16(4):277–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Svider PF, Jiron J, Zuliani G, Shkoukani MA, Folbe AJ, Carron M. Unattractive consequences: litigation from facial dermabrasion and chemical peels. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(8):1244–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Boulle K. Management of complications after implantation of fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2004;3(1):2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Winslow CP. The management of dermal filler complications. Facial Plast Surg. 2009;25(02):124–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rayess HM, Svider PF, Hanba C, Patel VS, DeJoseph LM, Carron M, Zuliani GF. A cross-sectional analysis of adverse events and litigation for injectable fillers. JAMA Facial Plastic Surg. 2018;20(3):207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Svider PF, Husain Q, Kovalerchik O, Mauro AC, Setzen M, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(6):699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johnson, J., Carron, M.A. (2021). Malpractice in Aesthetic Surgery and Procedures. In: Eloy, J.A., Svider, P.F., Baredes, S., Kelly, S.P. (eds) Litigation in Otolaryngology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64418-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64418-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64417-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64418-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics