Skip to main content

Abortion and China’s State Birth Control Program: A Socio-Ethical Inquiry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Abortion
  • 940 Accesses

Abstract

Nowhere else in the world, nor ever before in human history, has abortion been performed so extensively as a means of population control as in contemporary China. Since the early 1980s, the ambitious and intrusive state birth control program has had two essential aims: to control the quantity of the population through the one-child policy (replaced in 2015 with the two-child policy), and to enhance the quality of the population through eugenics. Such a state program constitutes a massive project of social engineering and thus a representative practice of authoritarian biopolitics. This chapter offers a socio-ethical inquiry into the role of abortion in the unprecedented population control campaign and the great plurality of differing Chinese perspectives. It discusses coerced abortion, eugenic abortion, sex-selective abortion, and the participation of health professionals, the question of liberty, the value of fetal life, the “common good” justification, and the international context. Particularly, it documents both the immediate and long-term effects of abortion on individuals, especially women, and on society as a whole. The chapter concludes that the tragic tale of abortion in contemporary China should serve as a perpetual lesson on authoritarian biopolitics for not only China but the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aird, J. S. (1990). Slaughter of the innocents: Coercive birth control in China. Washington, DC: AEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. Year unknown. A case of forced induced birth in Ankang. http://baike.baidu.com/view/8791389.htm (Warning: Graphic photos). Accessed 22 Sep 2018.

  • Banister, J. (1987). China’s changing population. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, W. (2013). The regulatory model of abortion in China through a feminist lens. Asian Women, 29(2), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, W. (2015). Exploring ‘Glorious motherhood’ in Chinese abortion law and policy. Feminist Legal Studies, 23, 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Law Press. (2017). The complete collection of laws on health and family planning. Beijing: China Law Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • China’s State Council. (1991). The white paper on human rights in China. Available at http://china.org.cn/e-white/7/index.htm. Assessed on 25 Sep 2018.

  • China’s State Council. (1995). The while paper on family planning in China. Available at http://www.china.org.cn/e-white/familypanning/. Assessed on 25 Sep 2018.

  • Cong, Y. (2003). Bioethics in China. In J. Peppin & M. Cherry (Eds.), The annals of bioethics: Regional perspective in bioethics (p. 252). Lisse: Swetz & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M. (2008). Fatal misconception: The struggle to control world population. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikötter, F. (1998). Imperfect conceptions: Medical knowledge, birth defects and eugenics in China. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S., & Winckler, E. (2005). Governing China’s population: From Leninist to neoliberal biopolitics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFleur, W. R. (1992). Liquid life: Abortion and Buddhism in Japan (pp. 103–118). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & The Research Group of Peking University Institute of Religious Cultures. (2014). Report on people’s religious beliefs in today’s China. Shiji Zhongjiao Wenhua (The World Religious Cultures), 1, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milwertz, C. N. (1997). Accepting population control: Urban Chinese women and the one-child family policy. Surrey: Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, M. L. (2001). The haunting fetus: Abortion, sexuality, and the spirit world in Taiwan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (1999). The problem of coerced abortion in China and some ethical issues. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(4), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2005). Behind the silence: Chinese voices on abortion. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2009). Radical disagreements of Chinese views on fetal life and implications for bioethics. In I. P. King-tak (Ed.), The bioethics of regenerative medicine (pp. 63–73). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2010a). China’s birth control program through feminist lenses. In J. L. Scully, L. Baldwin-Ragaven, & P. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Feminist bioethics: At the centre, on the margins (pp. 257–277). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2010b). Limits of state intervention in sex-selective abortion: The case of China. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2011a). Medical ethics in China: A transcultural interpretation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2011b). Non-medical sex-selective abortion in China: Ethical and social policy issues in the context of 40 million missing females. British Medical Bulletin, 98(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2014). China’s one-child policy, a policy without a future: Pitfalls of the common good argument and the authoritarian model. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 23(2), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2015). Tormented by competing moral duties: A “lost” Chinese abortion doctor. Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Bioethics), 2(1), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J.-B. (2016). Erosion of eldercare in China: A socio-ethical inquiry in population aging, elderly suicide and the government’s responsibility in the context of the one-child policy. Ageing International, 41(4), 350–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P. Ed. 1997. Zhongguo Jifa Shengyu Quanshu (The complete book of family planning in China). Beijing: China Population Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, S. H., & Potter, J. M. (1990). China’s peasants: The anthropology of a revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, S. (1996). Abortion law and practice in China: An overview with comparison to the United States. Social Sciences and Medicine, 42, 543–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. (2017). Population in China. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharping, T. (2003). Birth control in China 1949–2000: Population policy and demographic development (p. 12). London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2014). Global morality and life science practices in Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress House of Representatives. (1998). Forced abortion and sterilization in China: The view from the inside: Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Operation and Human Rights of the Committee on International Relations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress House of Representatives. (2011). China’s one-child policy: The government’s massive crime against women and unborn babies: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health and Human Rights of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel-Teuber, K. Tran. Jacqueline Mulberge. (2017). Statistics on religions and churches in the People’s Republic of China – Update for the year 2016. Religions & Christianity in Today’s China, VII (2), 26–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2006). China’s longest campaign: Birth planning in the people’s republic, 1949–2005. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, M. G. (1999). Commentary to Jing-Bao Nie’s article “The problem of coerced abortion in China and related ethical issues”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(4), 477–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, F. (2007). Daguo Kongchao (A big country in an empty nest: China’s family planning program derailed). Hong Kong: Dafeng Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Z., & Guo, F. (Eds.). (2007). Transition and challenge: China’s population at the beginning of the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C. Z., Li, S. Z., Qiu, C. R., Hu, P., & Jin, A. R. (1997). The double effects of the family planning program on Chinese Women. Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong University Press. (Published bilingually in Chinese and English).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Bao Nie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nie, JB. (2021). Abortion and China’s State Birth Control Program: A Socio-Ethical Inquiry. In: Bagheri, A. (eds) Abortion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63023-2_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics