Abstract
“Digital twining” is one the main ways of establishing data channels in cyber-physical systems combining the outputs of a virtual model with real time data collected by sensors. The purpose to this chapter is to outline the digital twin of a cyber-physical production system. The System Dynamics paradigm to the case of a shop-floor factory devoted to cloud manufacturing is applied. The digital twin uses data from the real production line, providing assistance to maintenance procedures triggered by inconsistencies between the real and the virtual processes.
References
Adamson G, Wang L, Holm M, Moore P (2017) Cloud manufacturing–a critical review of recent development and future trends. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(4–5):347–380
Babiceanu RF (2016) Big Datfia and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: a survey of the current status and future outlook. Comput Ind 81:128–137
Banks J, Carson J, Nelson B, Nicol D (2001) Discrete-event system simulation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210
Carson ER, Flood RL (1990) Model validation: philosophy, methodology and examples. Trans Inst MC 12(4):178–185
Damjanovic-Behrendt V, Behrendt W (2019) An open source approach to the design and implementation of Digital Twins for Smart Manufacturing. Int J Comp Integrat Manufact 57(20):1–19
Ding K, Chan F, Zhang X, Zhou G, Zhang F (2019) Defining a Digital Twin-based Cyber-physical Production system for autonomous manufacturing in smart shop floors. Int J Product Res 6315–6334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1566661
Forrester J (1961) Industrial dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Cambridge, MA
Forrester J, Senge P (1980) Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: Legasto A, Forrester J, Lyneis M (eds) System dynamics. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Grieves M (2014) Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White paper, 1–7. Retrieved from Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication: http://www.apriso.com/library/Whitepaper_Dr_Grieves_DigitalTwin_ManufacturingExcellence.php
Hekimoglu M, Barlas Y (2010) Sensitivity analysis of system dynamics models by behavior pattern measures. Proceedings of the 28th international conference of the system dynamics society, Seul
Hermann M, Pentek T, Otto B (2016) Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). IEEE, Hawaii, pp 3928–3937
Kumar S, Suhaib M, Asjad M (2020) Industry 4.0: complex, disruptive, but inevitable. Manag Product Eng Rev 11(1):43–51
Lee EA (2008) Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In Object oriented real-time distributed computing (isorc), 2008 11th ieee international symposium. IEEE, Florida, pp 363–369
Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufact Lett 3:18–23
Li J, Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhao L (2015) Big data in product lifecycle management. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(4):667–684
McGarvey B, Hannon B (2004) Modeling dynamic systems. Springer, New York
Mell P, Grance T (2011) The NIST definition of cloud computing. NIST, Washington, DC
Monostori L (2014) Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13
Monostori LK (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann 65(2):621–641
Morecroft J (2007) Strategic modelling and business dynamics. A feedback systems approach. Wiley, Chichester
Parsanejad M, Matsukawa H (2016) Work-in-process analysis in a production system using a control engineering approach. J Jpn Indust Manag Assoc 67(2):106–113
Rios J, Oliva M, Mas F (2015) Product avatar as digital counterpart of a physical individual product: literature review and implications in an aircraft. In: Curran R, Wognum N, Borsato M, Stjepandić J (eds) 22nd ISPE Inc. International conference on concurrent engineering. Volume 2: transdisciplinary lifecycle analysis of systems. IOS Press, Delft, pp 657–666
Rossit D, Tohmé F (2018) Scheduling research contributions to smart manufacturing. Manuf Lett 15:111–114
Rossit D, Tohmé F (2020) The tolerance scheduling problem for maximum lateness in Industry 4.0 systems. In Advances in mathematics for industry 4.0. Elsevier, London, pp 95–113
Rossit D, Tohmé F, Frutos M (2018) Industry 4.0: smart scheduling. Int J Product Res 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1504248
Rossit D, Tohmé F, Frutos M (2019a) A data-driven scheduling approach to smart manufacturing. J Ind Inf Integr:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2019.04.003
Rossit D, Tohmé F, Frutos M (2019b) An industry 4.0 approach to assembly line resequencing. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03804-0
Rossit D, Tohmé F, Frutos M (2019c) Production planning and scheduling in Cyber-Physical Production Systems: a review. Int J Comp Integrat Manufact 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1605199
Rossit D, Tohmé F, Mejía Delgadillo G (2020) The tolerance scheduling problem in a single machine case. In: Scheduling in industry 4.0 and cloud manufacturing. Springer, Cham, pp 255–273
Sacco M, Pedrazzoli P, Terkaj W (2010) VFF: virtual factory framework. In: 2010 IEEE international technology management conference. IEEE Press, Lugano, pp 1–8
Sánchez M (2013) Modeling for system’s understanding. In: P. Fonseca i Casas (ed) Formal languages for computer simulation: transdisciplinary models and applications. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 38–61
Sanchez MA (2018) How Internet of things is transforming project management. In: Gontar ZH (ed) In smart grid analytics for sustainability and urbanization. IGI Global, Warsaw, pp 73–102
Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Curency, New York
Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, New York
Tao F, Zhang M (2017) Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access 5:20418–20427
Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A, Kusiak A (2018) Data-driven smart manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 48:157–169
Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee A (2019) Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Indust Inform 15(4):2405–2415
Wang L, Wang X (2018) Cloud-based cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Springer, London
Wang W, He Z, Huang D, Zhang X (2014) Research on service platform of Internet of things for smart City. In Jiang J, Zhang H (eds) ISPRS technical commission IV symposium. XL-4. Suzhou, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci, pp 301–303
Wang L, Törngren M, Onori M (2015) Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 37:517–527
Wu D, Rossen D, Wang L, Schaefer D (2015) Cloud-based design and manufacturing: a new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Comput Aided Des 59:1–14
Yao X, Lin Y (2016) Emerging manufacturing paradigm shifts for the incoming industrial revolution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1–12
Yao X, Zhou J, Lin Y, Yu H, Liu Y (2019) Smart manufacturing based on cyber-physical systems and beyond. J Intell Manufact 30(8):1–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sánchez, M.A., Rossit, D., Tohmé, F. (2021). Modelling the Dynamics of a Smart Factory. In: Hussain, C.M., Di Sia, P. (eds) Handbook of Smart Materials, Technologies, and Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_66-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_66-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58675-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58675-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering