Abstract
Chapter 9 sketched the labours of elite mathematicians across a century and a half from 1846 to about 1990, discarding Bode’s Law and seeking to refine celestial mechanics in order to narrow the search area and discover further planets in the Outer Solar System. All, including the long-held Laplacian Theory for formation of the Solar System, would be swept aside, as Solar System studies based on Isaac Newton’s most exacting science have been rejuvenated by supercomputers.
The Voyager 2 spacecraft’s stunning flyby reconnaissance of the Neptune system in August 1989 revealed astonishing detail of the planet itself and of its large satellite Triton, a planet-sized body now believed to have been captured from the Kuiper belt, of which Pluto and its moon are also members. The flyby explained away the small residuals of Gaillot’s tables of Uranus (1909) which inspired Percival Lowell’s quest for Planet X and tempted later investigators. Meanwhile, resonances such as the near-2:1 resonance between Uranus and Neptune have proved to be key to understanding the present arrangement of planets in the Solar System. Also, the discovery since 1992 of many more bodies populating the Kuiper belt—a region previously regarded as empty and devoid of interest—has utterly changed our ideas about the Outer Solar System and its evolution.
Also, discoveries far beyond the Solar System have helped to increase knowledge of our own. Since the first exoplanet system (Pegasi 51 b/Dimidium) was recognised in 1995, thousands of others been discovered, many of them multi-planet systems and most very unlike our own Solar System. The sheer dissimilarity has challenged computer modellers to explain how such different arrangements arise, and in turn have enriched our understanding of the past evolution of our own Solar System leading to its present arrangement. The latter is not God-ordained, or a clockwork system as some of the 18th century followers of Newton (though not Newton himself) imagined. The Outer Solar System in particular has proved to be an important byproduct of this evolution, and attests to past migrations of the giant planets in the early history of the Solar System. Their interactions with planetesmials in the circum-solar disk sculpted the Kuiper belt, and scattered a vast number of asteroids and potential comets into the far outer Solar System where they form the spherical Oort cloud halo round our system.
Intense scrutiny including by the new generation of large 10-metre telescopes has led to the discovery of numerous dynamically and physically distinct categories of Kuiper belt objects (e.g., “cold” KBOs, “hot” KBOs, etc.) The understanding of how these categories came to be has helped shape a general picture of the Solar System’s evolution; though details are disputed, there is overall agreement around a concept known as the “Nice Model”, in which Jupiter was the first planet to form, initially migrated inwards through the inner Solar System like a wrecking ball, possibly destroying a first-generation of inner planets. However, the formation of Saturn, and a resonance with Jupiter, caused a reversal of Jupiter’s inward motion and subsequent migration outward to its current position (Jupiter’s Grand Tack), while also pushing the embryonic ice giants—Uranus and Neptune—outward.
There, Neptune—the “star not on the map”, in Heinrich d’Arrest’s arresting phrase—is the most massive and dominant body shaping its distant icy realm. At present, it is the outermost of the “major planets”, but it may not be the last. Astronomers have found subtle hints in the way the orbits of some distant Kuiper belt objects are arranged, and surmised the existence of a possible “Planet Nine.” Completing this book’s underlying theme, we close with a look forward to a future in which celestial mechanics, much evolved and altered, but also much more powerful than it was in the hands even of Adams and Le Verrier, continues to play an indispensable role in our attempts to understand the motions of the bodies of the Solar System. That history has yet to be written….
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agnor, C.B., Hamilton, D.P., 2006. Neptune’s capture of its moon Triton in a binary-planet gravitational encounter. Nature, 441(7090):192–194.
Bannister, M.T., Gladman, B.J., Kavellars, J.J. et al., 2018. OSSOS. VII. 800+ Trans-Neptunian Objects—The Complete Data Release. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 236(1), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab77a.arXiv:1805.11740.
Batygin, K., Adams, F.C., Brown, M.E., and Becker, J.C., 2019. The Planet Nine Hypothesis. Preprint, courtesy of K. Batygin.
Batygin, K. and Brown, M.E., 2016. Evidence for a Distant Outer Planet in the Solar System. Astronomical Journal, 151(2), 1–12.
Batygin, K., Bodenheimer, P.H., and Laughlin, G., 2016a. In Situ Formation and Dynamical Evolution of Hot Jupiter Systems. The Astrophysical Journal, 829:114 (17 pp.).
Batygin, K., Laughlin, G. and Morbidelli, A., 2016b. Order from Chaos. Scientific American (May), 33–39.
Bell, J., 2015. The Interstellar Age: inside the forty-year Voyager mission. New York, Dutton.
Brown, M.E., 2001. The Inclination of the Kuiper belt. The Astronomical Journal, 121:2804–2814.
Brown, M., 2010. How I killed Pluto and why it had it coming. New York, Spiegel and Grau.
Crida, A., 2009. Solar System formation. Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 21:215–227.
Cruikshank, D.P. (ed.), 1995. Neptune and Triton. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.
Cruikshank, D.P. and Sheehan, W., 2018. Discovering Pluto: exploration at the edge of the Solar System. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.
Duncan, M., Quinn, T. and Tremaine, S., 1988. The Origin of Short-period comets. The Astrophysical Journal, 328:L69–L73.
Fernandez, J.A. and Ip, W.H., 1984. Some dynamical aspects of the accretion of Uranus and Neptune: the exchange of orbital angular momentum with planetesimals. Icarus, 58:109–120.
Fienga, A., Laskar, J., Manche, H., Gastineau, M., 2016. Constraints on the location of a possible 9th planet derived from the Cassini data. arXIV:1602.06116.
Gomes, R.S., The origin of the Kuiper belt high-inclination population. Icarus, 161:404–418.
Gomes, R., Levison, H.F., Tsiganis, K., Morbidelli A., 2005. Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets. Nature, 435 (7041):466–469.
Hartmann, W.K., 2019. History of the Terminal Cataclysm Paradigm: epistemology of a bombardment that never(?) happened. Unpublished manuscript, courtesy of W.K. Hartmann.
Helled, R., Nettelmann, N., Guillot, T., 2019. Uranus and Neptune: Origin, Evolution and Internal Structure. ArXiv:1909.04891v1 (11 Sep 2019).
Kruit, P.C. van der, 2019. Jan Hendrik Oort: Master of the Galactic System. New York, Springer.
Levison, H.F., Dones, L., Chapman, C.R., Stern, S.A., Duncan, M.J. and Zahnle, K., 2001. Could the lunar Late Heavy Bombardment have been triggered by the formation of Uranus and Neptune? Icarus 151:286–206.
Levison, H.F., Morbidelli, A., Van Laerhoven, C., Gomes, R.S., Tsiganis, K., 2007. Origin of the Structure of the Kuiper belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Icarus, 186(1):258–273.
Levison, H.F., Dones, L., Chapman, C.R., Stern, S.A., Duncan, M.J., Zahnle, K., Lineweaver C.H., 2010. Crater-counting evidence against the late heavy bombardment hypothesis. Astrobiology Science Conference 2010, Abstract 5226.
Littman, M., 1990. Planets Beyond: Discovering the Outer Solar System. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Masset, F. and Snellgrove, M., 2002. Reversing type II migration: resonance trapping of a lighter giant protoplanet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 320:.L55–L59.
Mayor, M. and Queloz, D., 1995. A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature, 378 (6555):355–359.
Morbidelli, A. and Crida, A., 2007. The dynamics of Jupiter and Saturn in the gaseous protoplanetary disk. Icarus, 191(1), 158–171.
Nesvorný, D., Morbidelli, A., 2013. Capture of Trojans by Jumping Jupiter. The Astrophysical Journal, 768(1):45.
Nesvorný, D., Vokrouhlický, D., Deienno, R., 2014. Capture of Irregular Satellites at Jupiter. The Astrophysical Journal, 784(1):22.
Nesvorný D., 2011. Young Solar System’s Fifth Planet? The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 742(2):L22.
Nesvorný D, Li, R., Youdin, A.N., Simon, J.B., and Grundy, W.M., 2019. Trans-Neptunian binaries as evidence for planetesimal formation by the streaming instability. Nature Astronomy, 3:808–812.
Overbye, D., 2010. A Nest of Alien Asteroids Orbits our Sun. New York Times (28 April).
Parker, A.H. and Kavellars, J.J., 2010. Destruction of Binary Minor Planets during Neptune Scattering. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 722:L204–L208.
Pirani, S., Johansen, A., Bitsch, B., Mustill, A., Turini, D., 2019. The Consequences of Planetary Migration on the Minor Bodies of the early Solar System. Astronomy & Astrophysics. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004/6361/201833713.
Pyne, S. J., 2010. Voyager: seeking newer worlds in the third great age of discovery. New York, Viking.
Reaves, G., 1994. The Search for Planet X. In: Putnam, W.L. et al., The Explorers of Mars Hill: a century of history at Lowell Observatory. Kennebunkport, Maine.
Sagan, C., 1973. The Cosmic Connection. New York, Doubleday.
Sheehan, W., 1992. Worlds in the Sky: planetary discovery from earliest times through Voyager and Magellan. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.
Sheppard, S.C. and Trujillo, C.A., 2006. A Thick Cloud of Neptune Trojans and their Colors. Science, 313 (issue 5786):511–514.
Smith, R.W. and Tatarewicz, J.N., 1994a. Counting on Invention: devices and black boxes in very big science. Osiris, 9:101-1123.
Smith, B.A., and 64 colleagues, 1989. Voyager 2 at Neptune: Imaging science results. Science, 246:14220149.
Standish, M., 1993. Planet X—No dynamical evidence in the optical observations. Astronomical Journal, 105(5):2000–2006.
Stern, A. and Grinspoon, D., 2018. Chasing New Horizons: inside the epic first mission to Pluto. New York, Picador.
Taylor, G.F., 2001. Uranus, Neptune and the Mountains of the Moon. Planetary Science Research Discoveries (21 August).
Tera, F., Papanastassiou, D.A., Wasserburg, G.J., 1974a. Isotopic Evidence for a Terminal Lunar Cataclysm. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 22:1–21.
Tera, F., Papanastassiou, D.A., Wasserburg, G.J., 1974b. The lunar time scale and a summary of Isotopic Evidence for a Terminal Lunar Cataclysm. Houston, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstracts, p. 792.
Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., and Levison, H., 2005. Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar System. Nature, 434 (7041), 459–461.
Robert W. Smith and Joseph N. Tatarewicz, “Counting on Invention: Devices and Black Boxes in Very Big Science,” Osiris, 9(1994b), 101-123.
Acknowledgements
Konstantin Batygin, Trudy E. Bell, Dale P. Cruikshank, William K. Hartmann, Davor Krajnović, Jacques Laskar, Gregory P. Laughlin, Samantha Lawler, G. Wesley Lockwood, Richard Schmidt, the late Brad Smith, and Robert W. Smith. Special thanks to Batygin, Bell, Cruikshank, Roger Hutchins, Laughlin, Lockwood, Carolyn Kennett, Krajnović and Robert W. Smith all of whom carefully read and commented on a draft of this chapter and suggested many useful changes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheehan, W. (2021). Neptune Visited and the Outer Solar System Revolutionised, 1989–2019. In: Sheehan, W., Bell, T.E., Kennett, C., Smith, R. (eds) Neptune: From Grand Discovery to a World Revealed. Historical & Cultural Astronomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54218-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54218-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54217-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54218-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)