Abstract
The introduction of ‘securitization’ has aimed at putting emphasis on the construction of intersubjective understandings, within discursive processes, pointing to a threat and subsequently justifying exceptional measures. The chapter tackles the role of this concept in international relations and particularly security studies, offering an overview of its theoretical pathways and challenges as well as of the interplay among several standpoints (e.g. constructivist, critical, post-structural, etc.), within the Copenhagen School and beyond as well. Securitization has been basically linked to security as a speech act and to the facilitating conditions which make it more or less likely. However, further elaboration has been called for, often entailing a diversified reading of theory’s content, function and ontological underpinnings. Notable examples relate to the comprehension of securitization as an ideal type or as a concept affecting the relation between security and identity and to its expansion to something more than a speech act. Overall, new impetus has been given to security studies, through a varied discussion of securitization and its features, reflecting the diversified trajectory of IR theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abulof, U. (2014). Deep securitization and Israel’s ‘Demographic Demon’. International Political Sociology, 8(4), 396–415.
Alker, H. (2006). On securitization politics as contexted texts and talk. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(1), 70–80.
Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: (De)securitization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388–413.
Balzacq, Τ. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201.
Balzacq, T. (Ed.). (2011a). Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Balzacq, T. (2011b). A theory of securitization origins: Core assumptions, and variants. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve (pp. 1–30). Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Balzacq, T. (2015). The ‘Essence’ of securitization: Theory, ideal type, and a sociological science of security. International Relations, 29(1), 103–133.
Balzacq, T., & Guzzini, T. (2015). Introduction: What kind of theory –if any– is securitization? International Relations, 29(1), 97–102.
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bourbeau, P. (2014). Moving forward together: Logics of the securitization process. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(1), 187–206.
Browning, C., & Joenniemi, P. (2017). Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(1), 31–47.
Browning, C., & McDonald, M. (2013). The future of critical security studies: Ethics and the politics of security. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 235–255.
Buzan, B. (2004). The United States and the great powers: World politics in the twenty-first century. Cambridge-Maiden: Polity Press.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers the structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2009). Macro-securitization and security constellations: Reconsidering scale in securitization theory. Review of International Studies, 35(2), 253–276.
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner: Boulder, London.
Cavelty, M. D., & Jaeger, M. D. (2015). (In)visible ghosts in the machine and the powers that bind: The relational securitization of anonymous. International Political Sociology, 9(2), 176–194.
Ciuta, F. (2009). Security and the problem of context: A hermeneutical critique of securitization theory. Review of International Studies, 35(2), 301–326.
Corry, O. (2012). Securitization and ‘Riskification’: Second-order security and the politics of climate change. Millennium, 40(2), 235–258.
Doty, R. (1998). Immigration and the politics of security. Security Studies, 8(2–3), 71–93.
Eriksson, J., & Rhinard, M. (2009). The internal–external security Nexus. Notes on an emerging research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 44(3), 243–267.
Floyd, R. (2007). Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security: Bringing together the Copenhagen and the welsh schools of security studies. Review of International Studies, 33(2), 327–350.
Gad, P. U., & Petersen, K. L. (2011). Concepts of politics in securitization studies. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 315–328.
Guillaume, X. (2018). How to do things with silence: Rethinking the centrality of speech to the securitization framework. Security Dialogue, 49(6), 476–492.
Guzzini, S. (2011). Securitization as a causal mechanism. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 329–341.
Hansen, L. (2011a). Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad cartoon crisis. European Journal of International Relations, 17(1), 51–74.
Hansen, L. (2011b). The politics of securitization and the Muhammad cartoon crisis: A post-structuralist perspective. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 357–369.
Hansen, L. (2012). Reconstructing (De)securitization: The normative-political in the Copenhagen school and directions for how to apply it. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 525–546.
Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. (2012). Revolutionary securitization: An anthropological extension of securitization theory. International Theory, 4(2), 165–197.
Huysmans, J. (2004). A Foucaultian view on spill-over: Freedom and security in the EU. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(3), 294–318.
Ilgit, A., & Klotz, A. (2014). How far does ‘societal security’ travel? Securitization in south African immigration policies. Security Dialogue, 45(2), 137–155.
Jensen, L. (2012). Seduced and surrounded by security: A post-Structuralist take on Norwegian high north securitizing discourses. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(1), 80–99.
Karyotis, G. (2012). Securitization of migration in Greece: Process, motives, and implications. International Political Sociology, 6(4), 390–408.
Knudsen, O. (2001). Post-copenhagen security studies: Desecuritizing securitization. Security Dialogue, 32(3), 355–368.
McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the construction of security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 563–587.
Patomäki, H. (2015). Absenting the absence of future dangers and structural transformations in securitization theory. International Relations, 29(1), 128–136.
Pouliot, V. (2008). Logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization, 62(2), 257–288.
Roe, P. (2008). Actor, audience(s) and emergency measures: Securitization and the UK’s decision to invade Iraq. Security Dialogue, 39(6), 615–635.
Roe, P. (2012). Is securitization a ‘Negative’ concept? Revisiting the normative debate over normal versus extraordinary politics. Security Dialogue, 43(3), 249–266.
Rumelili, B. (2015). Identity and (De)securitization: The pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(1), 52–74.
Salter, M. (2008). Securitization and (De)securitization: A dramaturgical analysis of the Canadian air transport security authority. Journal of International Relations and Development, 11(4), 321–349.
Stetter, S., Herschinger, E., Teichler, T., & Albert, M. (2011). Conflicts about water: Securitizations in a global context. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(4), 441–459.
Stritzel, H. (2007). Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 13(3), 357–383.
Stritzel, H. (2011). Security, the translation. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 343–355.
Taureck, R. (2006). Securitization theory and securitization studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(1), 53–61.
Van Ryhtoven, E. (2015). Learning to feel, learning to fear? Emotions, imaginaries, and limits in the politics of securitization. Security Dialogue, 46(5), 458–475.
Vaughn, J. (2009). The unlikely Securitizer: Humanitarian organizations and the securitization of indistinctiveness. Security Dialogue, 40(3), 263–285.
Vuori, J. (2008). Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 65–99.
Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and (De)securitization. In R. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46–86). New York: Columbia University Press.
Wæver, O. (2011). Politics, security, theory. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 465–480.
Wæver, O. (2015). The theory act: Responsibility and exactitude as seen from securitization. International Relations, 29(1), 121–127.
Watson, S. (2012). ‘Framing’ the Copenhagen school: Integrating the literature on threat construction. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(2), 279–301.
Wilhelmsen, J. (2017). How does war become a legitimate undertaking? Re-engaging the post-structuralist foundation of securitization theory. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(2), 166–183.
Wilkinson, C. (2007). The Copenhagen school on tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is securitization theory useable outside Europe? Security Dialogue, 38(1), 5–25.
Williams, M. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511–531.
Williams, M. (2011). Securitization and the liberalism of fear. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 453–463.
Williams, M. (2015). Securitization as political theory: The politics of the extraordinary. International Relations, 29(1), 114–120.
Acknowledgements
The chapter draws from a paper presented at the conference of the International Studies Association—Comparative and Interdisciplinary Studies Section ‘Boundaries and Borders in an Evolving World Order: Challenges and Prospects’. Thessaloniki/Greece, 13-15/6/2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mikelis, K. (2021). Securitization: Theoretical Underpinnings and Implications. In: Voskopoulos, G. (eds) European Union Security and Defence. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48893-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48893-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48892-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48893-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)