Abstract
Over the past 50 years, the field of mixed methods research has undergone considerable development and expansion. While there have been concurrent advances and applications of arts-based research, there has been comparably little development at the intersection of these methodologies. However, the diverse fields of arts-based research and mixed methods research reflect similar underlying values pertaining to the strengths of integrating multiple ways of knowing, and a recent conceptualization of arts-mixed methods research has been offered in the literature. The argument made in this chapter is that this methodological merger has potential to foster socially inclusive research with real life impacts. Building off of this conceptualization, in this chapter, the author discusses arts-mixed methods research as a unique research approach with marked suitability for socially inclusive research. The author describes alignments between an arts-mixed methods research approach and the transformative mixed methods paradigm and draws attention to considerations of inclusive research. The author then explores the current emphasis on the epistemological gains of arts and how more tacit and embodied perspectives can be of benefit to an arts-mixed methods conceptualization in the context of socially inclusive research. The author concludes the chapter with a discussion of power in relation to arts-mixed methods and research practices for social inclusion more generally, postulating a chain of influence between the appropriateness of research methods and the downstream impact of these methods on social inclusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. (Eds.). (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Angell, C., Alexander, J., & Hunt, J. A. (2015). ‘Draw, write and tell’: A literature review and methodological development on the ‘draw and write’ research method. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X14538592.
Archibald, M. (2018). Integrating the arts and mixed methods research: A review and a way forward. Mixed Methods Research Special Edition: A Mixed Methods Research Manifesto, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 342–355.
Archibald, M., & Blines, J. (2021). Metaphors in the making: Illuminating the process of arts based health research through a case example in frailty research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987954.
Archibald, M. M., & Gerber, N. (2018). Arts and mixed methods research: An innovative methodological merger. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 956–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772672.
Archibald, M., & Onwuegbuzie, T. J. (2020). Poetry and mixed methods research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 12(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n2editorial3.
Archibald, M., Scott, S., & Hartling, L. (2014a). Mapping the waters: A scoping review of the use of visual arts in pediatric populations with health conditions. Arts and Health, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2012.759980.
Archibald, M. M., Caine, V., & Scott, S. D. (2014b). The development of a classification schema for arts-based approaches to knowledge translation. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12053.
Archibald, M. M., Caine, V., & Scott, S. D. (2017). Intersections of the arts and nursing knowledge. Nursing Inquiry, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12153.
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts based research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Cameron, R. (2011). Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the “first generation”. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2011.17.2.245.
Chenier, E. (2014). Oral history and open access: Fulfilling the promise of democratizing knowledge. Nano (New York, N.Y.), 5(5). https://nanocrit.com/issues/issue5/oral-history-and-open-access-fulfilling-promise-democratizing-knowledge.
Clark, A. (2018). John Keady, Lars-Christer Hydén, Ann Johnson and Caroline Swarbrick (eds), Social research methods in dementia studies: Inclusion and innovation. Dementia, 17(5), 635–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301218772617.
Creamer, E. G., & Schoonenboom, J. (2018). Inter-method mixing as a gateway to methodological innovation. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218756917.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Dalton/Sage.
Cuevas-Parra, P., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2019). Child-led research: Questioning knowledge. Social Sciences, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020044.
Curry, L., & Leslie, A. (2015). In M. Nunez-Smith (Ed.), Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer. Los Angeles: Sage.
Feldon, D. F., & Tofel-Grehl, C. (2018). Phenomenography as a Foundation for Mixed Models Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772640.
Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222.
Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969.
Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2018). Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641.
Guetterman, T. C., Babchuk, W. A., Howell Smith, M. C., & Stevens, J. (2019). Contemporary approaches to mixed methods–grounded theory research: A field-based analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817710877.
Iwama, M., Marshall, M., Marshall, A., & Bartlett, C. (2009). Two-eyed seeing and the language of healing in community-based research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32(2), 3. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/220297257?accountid=12834.
Jagodzinski, J. (2013). Arts-based research: A critique and a proposal. Rotterdam/Boston: Sense Publishers.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
Keady, J. (Ed.). (2018). Social research methods in dementia studies: Inclusion and innovation. Abingdon: Routledge.
Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (2007). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Liamputtong, P. (2020). Qualitative research methods (5th ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2016). Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815571132.
Mayoh, J., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2015). Toward a conceptualization of mixed methods phenomenological research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813505358.
McMellon, C., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2020). Children and young people’s participation rights. Looking Backwards and Moving Forwards, 28(1), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801002.
Mertens, D. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409902000102.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612.
Mertens, D. M. (2012a). Transformative mixed methods: Addressing inequities. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433797.
Mertens, D. M. (2012b, July 2006). Transformative paradigm. Encyclopedia of evaluation encyclopedia of evaluation, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950596.n553.
Nakamura, K. (2019). A progressive vision of democratizing ArT: Dewey’s and Barnes’s experiments in art education in the 1920s. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 53(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.53.1.0025.
Nind, M. (2014). What is inclusive research? London: Bloomsbury.
Poth, C. N. (2018). Innovation in mixed methods research: A practical guide to integrative thinking with complexity. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books?id=661vDwAAQBAJ
Powell, H., Mihalas, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Suldo, S., & Daley, C. E. (2008). Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20296.
Simplican, S. (2020). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29.
Strnadová, I., & Walmsley, J. (2018). Peer-reviewed articles on inclusive research: Do co-researchers with intellectual disabilities have a voice? Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12378.
Uprichard, E., & Dawney, L. (2019). Data diffraction: Challenging data integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674650.
Van Der Vaart, G., Van Hoven, B., & Huigen, P. P. P. (2020). Forum: Qualitative social lessons from a participatory research project in the Netherlands. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(2), 1–23.
Walmsley, J., & Johnson, K. (2003). In K. Johnson (Ed.), Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities past, present, and futures. Philadelphia: J. Kingsley Publishers.
Yassi, A., Spiegel, J. B., Lockhart, K., Fels, L., Boydell, K., & Marcuse, J. (2016). Ethics in community-university-artist partnered research: Tensions, contradictions and gaps identified in an ‘arts for social change’ project. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9257-7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Archibald, M.M. (2021). Arts and Mixed Methods Research for Social Inclusion. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Inclusion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_20-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_20-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48277-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48277-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine