Abstract
Health care students, including occupational therapy students, are required to use reflective practice in many coursework assignments, during their mandated clinical placements, and when practicing as health care professionals. The catalyst for this investigation was that university students are frequently required to complete these reflections in a written format. This is surprising, and contrary to clinical placements and practice, where the majority of reflection is undertaken either verbally with other health care professionals or via internal thought mechanisms (i.e. thinking about their thinking and decision making). After graduation from university, the use of written reflections is almost non-existent for health care practitioners. This chapter will argue that the commonly used written reflections do not mimic how reflection takes place during clinical placements and when working as a health care professional. The investigation described in this chapter aimed to identify the preferred method of reflection that third-year undergraduate occupational therapy students chose when offered a choice of reflective medium and to understand why they preferred the chosen format. Students who participated in our investigation could choose either a written, video or an artistic format to complete five reflective practice tasks. Students undertook a mandatory clinical placement where they spent a minimum of 75 h onsite at an aged care residential facility. During and after the placement, the students selected five topics from a list of 30+ topics that focussed their reflections on their effectiveness as an occupational therapist. For each topic, they were free to choose either of the three reflective medium formats. A total of 68 students completed an online survey, which collected quantitative and qualitative data. The 68 students completed a total of 340 reflective pieces with 81% preferring the video format, 18% selecting the written format, and only two students choosing an artistic format. Students reported that the video format was preferred because video required them to use verbal communication, which was the same method of reflection used during clinical placements. Video was also preferred because it allowed the full array of emotions to be expressed. The most commonly selected topics were “Critique your interpersonal, communication, and assertive skills” (57%) and “Critique your emotional resilience and coping skills” (43%). From the findings, the chapter, recommends that university educators shift from using written reflective assignments to verbal formats. The verbal format is both the preferred and most commonly used format of reflective practice used during clinical placement and in practice. Our results provide overwhelming evidence that students prefer the verbal format because they know that this is how reflection is completed in healthcare settings. Even those who preferred the written format agreed that the written expression of emotions is difficult and lacks sophistication when compared to the video format where the full set of emotional communication tools are available – words, facial gestures, body language, and voice pitch and intonation. University educators are encouraged to offer a choice of verbal and written reflective formats to students, with a requirement to complete most reflective tasks in the verbal format before commencing clinical placements. Our findings indicate that health care students prefer assignments to replicate the formats that they will encounter during clinical placements and when working as health care professionals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. (D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker, Eds.). London, UK: Kogan Page.
Cain, M., Le, A. H., & Billett, S. (2019). Sharing stories and building resilience: Student preferences and processes of post-practicum interventions. In S. Billett, J. Newton, G. Rogers, & C. Noble (Eds.), Augmenting health and social care students’ clinical learning experiences: outcomes and processes (pp. 27–53). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Curtis, P., Taylor, G., Riley, R., Pelly, T., & Harris, M. (2017). Written refection in assessment and appraisal: GP and GP trainee views. Education for Primary Care, 28(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2016.1277168
Dacre Pool, L., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: Developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + Training, 49(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710754435
Fragkos, K. (2016). Reflective practice in healthcare education: An umbrella review. Education Sciences, 6(27), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030027
Grant, A., Kinnersley, P., Metcalf, E., Pill, R., & Houston, H. (2006). Students’ views of reflective learning techniques: An efficacy study at a UK medical school. Medical Education, 40(4), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02415.x
Gribble, N., Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Parsons, R. (2017). Strategies for interprofessional facilitators and clinical supervisors that may enhance the emotional intelligence of therapy students. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(5), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1341867
Hill, A. E., Davidson, B. J., & Theodoros, D. G. (2012). Reflections on clinical learning in novice speech-language therapy students. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00154.x
Karen, Y., Kimberley, J., & Sue, N. (2016). Exploration of a reflective practice rubric. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(2), 135–147.
Larkin, H., & Pepin, G. (2010). Becoming a reflective practitioner. In K. Stagnitti, A. Schoo, & D. Welch (Eds.), Clinical and fieldwork placements in the health professions (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Lavoué, É., Molinari, G., Prié, Y., & Khezami, S. (2015). Reflection-in-action markers for reflection-on-action in computer-supported collaborative learning settings. Computers & Education, 88, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.001
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
Miraglia, R., & Asselin, M. E. (2015). Reflection as an educational strategy in nursing professional development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 31(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000151
NVivo. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software: version 10. QSR International Pty Ltd.
Occupational Therapy Board of Australia. (2018). Australian occupational therapy competency standards 2018. Retrieved from http://www.occupationaltherapyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines/Competencies.aspx
Rodger, S., Fitzgerald, C., Davila, W., Millar, F., & Allison, H. (2011). What makes a quality occupational therapy practice placement? Students’ and practice educators’ perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00903.x
Sandars, J. (2009). The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE guide no. 44. Medical Teacher, 31(8), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903050374
Schell, B. A. (2009). Professional reasoning in practice. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 314–327). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stagnitti, K., Schoo, D., & Welch, D. (2010). Clinical and fieldwork placements in the health professions (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Tan, S. M., Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Gardner, P. (2010). Using blogging to promote clinical reasoning and metacognition in undergraduate physiotherapy fieldwork programs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1080
Tsingos, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., & Smith, L. (2015). Learning styles and approaches: Can reflective strategies encourage deep learning? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(4), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.04.006
World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2016). Minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists (2016 revision). London, UK: The Council of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists.
Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is – What it is not (Learning and employability series 1). York, UK: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/id116_employability_in_higher_education_336.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
The 33 topics that students could select from:
-
1.
Critique your use of evidence-based practice.
-
2.
Critique your emotional resilience and coping skills.
-
3.
Critique your interpersonal, communication, and assertive skills.
-
4.
Critique your initial interview skills.
-
5.
Critique your ability to explain occupational therapy to your residents.
-
6.
Critique your first two days on the placement.
-
7.
Critique an assessment that you completed.
-
8.
Critique your ability to interpret information from assessments.
-
9.
Critique your ability to assess occupational performance.
-
10.
Critique a set of progress notes
-
11.
Critique the occupation-based goals that were set
-
12.
Reflect on how you coped when receiving feedback.
-
13.
Critique a clinical decision you made.
-
14.
Critique your clinical reasoning skills.
-
15.
Critique a group activity/session you facilitated.
-
16.
Critique an intervention you implemented with a resident.
-
17.
Critique your ability to deal with stress.
-
18.
Critique why you became frustrated or annoyed during the placement?
-
19.
Critique your time management and organisational skills.
-
20.
Critique your teamwork skills.
-
21.
Critique your confidence in making decisions.
-
22.
Critique how you dealt with an ethical issue.
-
23.
Critique how you dealt with elder abuse – if you observed it.
-
24.
Did one of the residents pass away during your time in the facility? How did you react?
-
25.
Did you have a strong emotional reaction to something that occurred?
-
26.
Critique your ability to deal with workplace politics.
-
27.
Critique how you evaluated the outcome of the OT program.
-
28.
Critique how you concluded the therapeutic relationships at the end of the placement?
-
29.
If you worked on a project, critique the outcome.
-
30.
Select any item or set of items on the SPEF-R. Critique your skills in this area.
-
31.
Critique how you used OT theory during the placement, e.g. OT model, CPPF, occupation as core to occupational therapy etc.
-
32.
Reflect on your preparedness for your 4th-year full-time clinical placements.
-
33.
Other topic was chosen – use free text.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gribble, N., Netto, J. (2020). The Preferred Method of Reflection for Occupational Therapy Students During and After Clinical Placements: Video, Written or Artistic?. In: Billett, S., Orrell, J., Jackson, D., Valencia-Forrester, F. (eds) Enriching Higher Education Students' Learning through Post-work Placement Interventions. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48062-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48062-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48061-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48062-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)