Skip to main content

Quantum Physics vs. Classical Physics: Introducing the Basics with a Virtual Reality Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2019)

Abstract

Unlike classical physics, quantum physics is harder to explain, as it involves very small scales and phenomena that are not visible to the naked eye. Understanding the differences between classical and quantum physics is difficult, especially for children, who cannot grasp the subtleties conveyed in complicated formulae.

We propose to achieve this in a playful and immersive manner, which is a more familiar and convenient way to introduce children to new concepts. For this we developed Save Schrödinger’s Cat, a puzzle game in virtual reality featuring a classical physics mode and a quantum physics mode. As virtual objects and phenomena behave differently in each mode, this mechanic encourages players to toggle between modes, in order to explore the differences between quantum and classical physics in an immersive, entertaining and challenging way. A preliminary evaluation showed that players could better identify various distinguishing features of either mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.vive.com/eu/product/.

  2. 2.

    http://quantumgame.io/.

  3. 3.

    https://vr.arvilab.com/products/games/laser-puzzle-in-vr.

  4. 4.

    https://minecraft.curseforge.com/projects/qcraft.

  5. 5.

    https://minecraft.net.

  6. 6.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O27HqhHi5Y2puhz_5sC6iHUy2norCgbx/view?usp=sharing.

  7. 7.

    https://unity.com/.

  8. 8.

    https://store.steampowered.com/steamvr.

  9. 9.

    https://www.tudelft.nl/sciencecentre/.

References

  1. Ataman, S.: Vacuum birefringence detection in all-optical scenarios. Phys. Rev. A 97(6). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.063811

  2. Bjælde, O.E., Pedersen, M.K., Sherson, J.: Gamification of quantum mechanics teaching. In: Bastiaens, T. (ed.) Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, pp. 218–222, New Orleans, LA, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deslauriers, L., Wieman, C.: Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010101

  4. Freina, L., Ott, M.: A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: The International Scientific Conference e-Learning and Software for Education, vol. 1, p. 133. “Carol I” National Defence University, April 2015

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quantum technologies to revolutionize 21st century. https://phys.org/news/2016-06-quantum-technologies-revolutionize-21st-century.html. Accessed 12 June 2019

  6. Singh, C., Marshman, E.: Review of student difficulties in upper-level quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11(2), 020117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020117

  7. Wessel-Berg, T.: Electromagnetic and Quantum Measurements: A Bitemporal Neoclassical Theory, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1603-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Bidarra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A Evaluation Questionnaire

The following two pages were given to play-testers in the TU Delft VR Zone and Science Centre.

figure a

Appendix B Results

Two questions were left out, because of different reasons. The first was “Splitting beams into two with a beam splitter”, because the game logic contradicts the real world, so players that have experience in physics will check the box while players that do not will not check the box. The second that was left out was “Evil scientists stealing your cat”, because the majority of players considered it a joke and did not seriously answer the question.

Table 1. Questionnaire results about differences between quantum physics and classical physics, given to both play-testers and control group members.

Table 1 presents the raw data of filled-in questionnaires, including a computed average for the aggregate of the rows. Each row represents one valid questionnaire. Table 2 presents the results with regard to the questionnaire statements on the game itself.

Table 2. Scores for the statements on Save Schrödinger’s Cat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dorland, B. et al. (2019). Quantum Physics vs. Classical Physics: Introducing the Basics with a Virtual Reality Game. In: Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G., Gentile, M., Ninaus, M. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34350-7_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34350-7_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34349-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34350-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics