Skip to main content

Flagging Exclusionary Nationalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flags, Color, and the Legal Narrative

Part of the book series: Law and Visual Jurisprudence ((LVJ,volume 1))

Abstract

After an outline of the history, design and uses of the Australian flag, this paper considers the media frenzy and public outcry surrounding the publication of research findings identifying a relationship between the flying of Australian flags on cars for Australia Day and racist attitudes. While the findings did not surprise many social scientists, given the semiotics of the flag and its increasing use as a symbol of exclusion, they were apparently highly contentious for portions of the Australian public. This paper describes and analyses the public reaction using three case studies from among the hundreds of examples. An email, a blog discussion, and a newspaper article, are analysed to demonstrate overlapping themes focussed on racism, patriotism, and nationalism. The chapter concludes that the publicity flagging the relationship between flag use and exclusionary nationalism actually may have worked against the goal of producing a considered debate about appropriate forms of nationalism and flag use, delivering the flag into the hands of exclusionary nationalist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This video was at http://youtu.be/wZfahrst2P4 but has since been removed.

  2. 2.

    While this paper focuses on the negative response, it must be noted there was also a positive response. For example, positive emails were received from strangers and from people known to the researcher such as colleagues inside and outside academia, including a Canadian researcher interested in a comparative analysis of what the maple leaf flag would represent in similar circumstances. There were also positive Letters to the Editor and online posts (examples can be seen in Appendix 3 for ‘Funny Ha Ha’ and ‘The lone gunmen’), defending the research design, the findings, and the researcher herself. However the positive responses by email were at a rate of about 1 in 5, and in online discussions far fewer, at a rate of about 1 in 10.

  3. 3.

    Pedersen and colleagues have demonstrated that those with higher levels of ‘prejudice’ are more likely to assume their views are shared by others (Pedersen et al. 2008; Pedersen and Hartley 2012).

  4. 4.

    The reference to $2 million is to the researcher’s total research income over her academic career, not to the flags project, which was unfunded. This amount was mentioned in the newspaper editorial to which this blog is a response.

References

  • Ahmed S (2010) Feminist killjoys (and other wilful subjects). The Scholar and Feminist Online, 8(3). http://sfonline.barnard.edu/polyphonic/ahmed_01.htm. Accessed 10 Sep 2012

  • Alexander I (2019) Explainer: our copyright laws and the Australian Aboriginal flag, The Conversation, June 13, 2019. http://theconversation.com/explainer-our-copyright-laws-and-the-australian-aboriginal-flag-118687. Accessed 16 June 2019

  • Anderson ([1981] 2006) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker M (1981) The new racism. Junction Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (2006) The cosmopolitan vision. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Butz D, Sibley C, Barlow F, Bitacola L, Christ O, Khan S, Leong C, Pehrson S, Srinivasan N, Sulz A, Tausch N, Urbanska K, Wright S (2017) What do national flags stand for? An exploration of associations across 11 countries. J Cross-Cult Psychol 48(3):335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndsen M, Gausel N (2018) Support for national flag-displays in times of change: a question of national identification? Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12171

  • Billig M (1988) The notion of ‘prejudice’: some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Text 8:91–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig M (1995) Banal nationalism. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratta P (2009) Flag display post-9/11: a discourse on American nationalism. J Am Culture 32(3):232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy M (2004) Public sociologies: contradictions, dilemmas, and possibilities. Soc Forces 82(4):1603–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke S, Goodman S (2012) ‘Bring back Hitler’s gas chambers’: asylum seeking, Nazis and Facebook - a discursive analysis. Discourse Soc 23(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron S, McAllister I (2016) Trends in Australian political opinion: results from the Australian election study 1987–2016. Australian Election Studies. https://www.australianelectionstudy.org/charts/Trends%20in%20Australian%20Political%20Opinion%201987-2016%20-%20Appendix.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2019

  • Clark A (2006) Flying the flag for mainstream Australia. Griffith Rev 11:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetrious K (2016) Stoking expectations: public relations and the politics of ‘bogans’. In: Marshall P, D’Cruz G, McDonald S, Lee K (eds) Contemporary publics. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 181–197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2006) Australian flags. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Barton ACT

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine M (2012, January 26). Academic’s data sinks the boot in on Australia Day. Herald Sun. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/academics-data-sinks-the-boot-in-on-australia-day/story-e6frfhqf-122625379280830. Accessed 30 Jan 2012

  • Doyle K, Tranter K (2017) F# CK YOUR FAMILY!: The visual jurisprudence of automobility. Int J Semiot Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9477-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn K, Nelson J (2011) Challenging the public denial of racism: a deeper multiculturalism. J Intercult Stud 32(6):587–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D, Potter J (1992) Discursive psychology. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery B, Watt S (2019) Pauline Hanson, One Nation (PHON) and right-wing protective popular nationalism: monocultural tendencies at the expense of social cohesion. In: Grant B, Moore T, Lynch T (eds) The rise of right-populism: Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and Australian politics. Springer, Singapore, pp 63–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foley C (1996) The Australian flag: colonial relic or contemporary icon? The Federation Press, Leichhardt, NSW, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fozdar F, Spittles B, Hartley L (2015) Australia Day, flags on cars and Australian nationalism. J Sociol 51(2):317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelber K (2012) Political culture, flag use and freedom of speech. Polit Stud 60(1):163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman S (2010) ‘It’s not racist to impose limits on immigration’: constructing the boundaries of racism in the asylum and immigration debate. Crit Approach Discourse Anal Across Disciplines 4(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman S, Burke S (2010) ‘Oh you don’t want asylum seekers, Oh you’re just racist’: a discursive analysis of discussions about whether it’s racist to oppose asylum seeking. Discourse Soc 21(3):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage G (1998) White nation: fantasies of white supremacy in a multicultural society. Pluto Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Henckels C (2018) Dishonouring the Australian flag. Monash Univ Law Rev 44(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath G (2018) The semiotics of flags: the New Zealand flag debate deconstructed. In: Mehta S (ed) Language and literature in a glocal world. Springer, Singapore, pp 115–126

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking W, Devic A, Drill S (2012, January 25) Politicians unite over row. Herald Sun, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurcombe E (2016) The making of a captain: the production and projection of a political image on the Tony Abbott Facebook page. Commun Polit Cult 49(1):19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (2009, January 31) When patriotism becomes provocation. The Sydney Morning Herald, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns A (2015) Battle for the flag. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke C (2004) The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy. Br J Sociol 55(2):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JR (2012, January 28) X told ‘Go back to your own country’. A Western Heart. Weblog. http://awesternheart.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/uwa-academic-farida-fozdar-told-go-back.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2012

  • Jupp J (2007) From white Australia to Woomera: the story of Australian immigration. Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, Victoria

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier M, Winter D (2008) Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism?: Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Polit Psychol 29(6):859–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby M (2000) The Australian referendum on a republic – ten lessons. Aust J Polit Hist 46(4):510–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan E (2006) Flag and Nation: Australians and their national flags since 1901. UNSW Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan E (2010) Flag. In: Harper M, White R (eds) Symbols of Australia: uncovering the stories behind the myths. National Museum of Australia & University of NSW Press, Canberra, pp 98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Maravillas F (2013) Boats, borders and the geo-imaginaries of the South. PORTAL J Multidiscip Int Stud. https://doi.org/10.5130/portal.v10i1.2121

  • Marusek S (2013) License plates: personalized jurisdiction and performativity of rights. Law Cult Humanit. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872112469862

  • NAIDOC (National Aborigines and Islanders Day Observance Committee) (2011) Indigenous Australian flags. NAIDOC. https://web.archive.org/web/20110706125441/http://www.naidoc.org.au/about/. Accessed 8 June 2019

  • Noble G (2009) Lines in the sand: the Cronulla riots, multiculturalism and national belonging. Institute of Criminology Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr G (2010) A fetishised gift: the legal status of flags. Griffith Law Rev 19(3):504–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen A, Hartley L (2012) Prejudice against Muslim Australians: the role of values, gender and consensus. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 22:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen A, Griffiths B, Watt S (2008) Attitudes toward outgroups and the perception of consensus: ‘All feet do not wear one shoe’. J Community Appl Soc 18:543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera S (2007) ‘Aussie luck’: the border politics of citizenship post Cronulla Beach. Aust Crit Race Whiteness Stud Assoc J 3(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera S (2010) From ‘sovereignty’ to ‘sustainability’: the loops and lineaments of exclusion 2001–2010. In: Perera S, Seal G, Summers S (eds) Enter at own risk? Australia’s population questions for the 21st century. Black Swan Press, Perth, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda R, Sowards S (2007) Flag waving as visual argument: 2006 immigration demonstrations and cultural citizenship. Argumentation Advocacy 43:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz M (1986) Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Hum Stud 9:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds H, Lake M (2010) What’s wrong with ANZAC? The militarisation of Australian history. University if NSW Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanafelt R (2008) The nature of flag power: how flags entail dominance, subordination, and social solidarity. Polit Life Sci 27(2):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitka L (2005) Patriotism or nationalism?: Understanding post-September 11, 2001 flag display behaviour. J Appl Soc Psychol 35(10):1995–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman L (1997) Nation and commemoration: creating national identities in the United States and Australia. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B (2011, January 22) On Australia Day, it’s time to reclaim our flag. The West Australian. http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/opinion/-/blog/belletaylor/post/372/comment/. Accessed 25 June 2016

  • The Argus (1901, September 4) The Australian flag: successful competitors, five share the prize. The Argus, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • The Telegraph (2012, January 25) Nation’s tolerance for this nonsense is flagging. The Telegraph. Weblog. http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/mirandadevine/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/nations_tolerance_for_this_sort_of_nonsense_is_quickly_flagging/. Accessed 30 Jan 2012

  • University of Western Australia (2012, January 23) Study shows racist views link to car flags. University News. http://www.news.uwa.edu.au/201201234297/research/study-shows-racist-views-link-car-flags. Accessed 8 June 2019

  • van Dijk T (1992) Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse Soc 3(1):87–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec S, Wessendorf S (eds) (2010) The multicultural backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward I (2012) Wrapping leaders with the Australian flag. Does it matter? Aust J Commun 39(2):73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak R, De Cillia R, Reisigl M, Liebhart K (2009) The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Young S (2017) News corporation tabloids and press photography during the 2013 Australian federal election. Journal Stud 18(7):866–889

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farida Fozdar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

The Telegraph (2012, January 25). Several posts have been deleted due to length. Language has not been edited. While these comments originally appeared in response to Miranda’s blog article, they are now inaccessible online.

Appendix 1

Press release, University of Western Australia. (2012, January 23). Study shows racist views link to car flags. University News. http://www.news.uwa.edu.au/201201234297/research/study-shows-racist-views-link-car-flags. Accessed 8 June 2019.

1.1 Study Shows Racist Views Link to Car Flags

People who fly Australia Day flags on their cars tend to express more racist attitudes than others without flags, according to research findings at The University of Western Australia.

UWA sociologist Professor Fozdar and a team of assistants surveyed 513 people at last year’s Australia Day fireworks on Perth’s Swan River foreshore.

One in five said they had attached flags to their cars to celebrate Australia Day.

Professor Fozdar said 43% of those with car flags said they believed the now-abandoned White Australia Policy had saved Australia from many problems experienced by other countries, while only 25% without flags agreed.

A total of 56% of people with car flags feared their culture and its most important values were in danger, compared with 34% of non-flaggers.

And 35% of flaggers felt that people had to be born in Australia to be truly Australian, while 23% believed that true Australians had to be Christian, compared with 22% and 18% respectively for non-flaggers.

Professor XX said her research also revealed clear differences in how people with car flags felt towards minority groups.

Only 39% of flaggers expressed a positive view towards Aboriginal Australians compared with 47% of non-flaggers, 19% of flaggers felt positive towards Muslim Australians compared with 26% of non-flaggers; 7% of flaggers were positive towards asylum seekers compared with 24% of non-flaggers, and 27% with flags felt positive towards Asian Australians compared with 48% of non-flaggers.

Three survey questions sought views on Australian cultural diversity: 64% of people with car flags agreed that it was good for people from different ethnic, religious and racial groups to live in Australia, compared with 75% of non-flaggers.

An overwhelming 91% of people with car flags agreed that people who move to Australia should adopt Australian values, compared with 76% of non-flaggers.

A total of 55% of flaggers believed migrants should leave their old ways behind, compared with 30% of non-flaggers.

However majorities of both groups—60% of flaggers and 73% of non-flaggers—also felt that it was best to respect and learn from each other’s cultural differences.

Professor Fozdar said there was no clear link between education, gender, ethnicity, citizenship, voting pattern or income and flag flying, although her survey showed a slightly higher likelihood of younger rather than older people adopting the practice.

In terms of nationalism, 88% of those with Australia Day car flags said they thought it showed they were proud to be Australian, while only 52% of those without flags thought so.

Some thought the increased popularity of flying Australia Day car flags was due to increased patriotism while others said it was simply peer pressure to follow the trend or avoid seeming unpatriotic.

Many said it was due to marketing and the cheap availability of car flags, while some thought it was a response to loss of culture due to multiculturalism, immigration, invasion and terrorism.

“What I found interesting is that many people didn’t really have much to say about why they chose to fly car flags or not,” Professor Fozdar said.

“Many felt strongly patriotic about it – and for some, this was quite a racist or exclusionary type of patriotism – but it wasn’t a particularly conscious thing for many.

“Very clear statistical differences in attitudes to diversity between those who fly car flags and those who don’t, show that flag waving – while not inherently exclusionary – is linked in this instance to negative attitudes about those who do not fit the ‘mainstream’ stereotype’.”

Professor Fozdar said fewer people said they flew Australia Day car flags last year—one in five—compared with 2010 when it was one in four.

Appendix 2

The image has an article, titled Politicians unite over race row. The media monitors logo is at the top left of the page.

Appendix 3

The Telegraph (2012, January 25). Several posts have been deleted due to length. Language has not been edited. While these comments originally appeared in response to Miranda’s blog article, they are now inaccessible online.

Section of blog discussion from article: Nation’s tolerance for this nonsense is flagging ( The Telegraph 2012 )

Wed 25 Jan 12 (07:12 pm)

Keith replied to Shebif Thu 26 Jan 12 (09:51 pm)

It’s a funny coincidence that such vilification of Australia and Australians always finds its way into the msm just in time for Australia Day. The usual lefty smears are indulged and indeed encouraged. Of course it doesn’t hurt these terribly courageous crusading sociologists to get their names in the paper when comes time for the next batch of grants to be given out. Fozdar should be sent a demand to refund the $2 millionFootnote 4 out of her own pocket. Her “research” is a bad joke.

Pubello replied to Shebif Fri 27 Jan 12 (07:59 am)

Funny Ha Ha… Shebif.

More denial from the supporters of the Noalition. Next you’ll tell us that the Cronulla riots were a reflection of good will towards people of ethnic backgrounds. As drunken yobs, drapped in the national flag, attacked anyone of non anglo background.

…[4 paragraphs deleted]

…[two posts deleted]

truthteller replied to Shebif Thu 23 Feb 12 (10:19 pm)

A major cause of the Cronulla riots was Muslim men raping white women and saying that they would do them leb style. Muslims should be deeply ashamed as anyone else who behaved imroperly during that riot.

[one para deleted]

the lone gunmen(Reply) Wed 25 Jan 12 (07:12 pm)

evil wraps itself in a flag every time. blind nationalism can be a dangerous thing.

todd of adelaide(Reply) Wed 25 Jan 12 (08:14 pm)

Lloyd replied to todd Thu 26 Jan 12 (12:50 am)

…[one para deleted]

Your comment is just rubbish which is intended to impugn anyone who loves their country.

But there an aspect of our national identity to which we are blind and which is dangerous, at least to us. We are blind to the fact that we a) are generous to a fault; b) are overly tolerant; and c) place such stock in egalitarianism that we are borderline socialist.

I’d rather spend some time during Australia Day pondering my good fortune in being of this great country than wallowing in angst about waving the flag.

…[20 posts deleted – including positive, negative and neutral]

con T replied to Sean Fri 27 Jan 12 (03:28 pm)

would say kathy freeman wearing the aussies flag and running around the arena in 2000 is ok

Of course its OK!She is not wrapping it around herself getting drunk and abusing people is she?

I see that Ms Fozdar got her Phd in Wellington N.Z……

One wonders how long her association with Australia has been…Is it good for the youth of Australia to be overexposed to the attitudes she seems to espouse?The generations of Australians whose energy and selfsacrifice made this country what it is… .and of whose bounty Ms Fozdar is now the recipent…… .should be thanked..not slighted in this mean-spirited way..

Appendix 4

Example of email sent to the researcher.

From: les …Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 5:53 PMTo: (Author removed)Subject:racism with flying our flag.

  1. 1.

    Listen here lassie, yes you, how long have you been in this country? …I was born

  2. 2.

    here, I have defended this country and fought for this country under that flag, my

  3. 3.

    father also defended this nation under the flag and now my son and daughter who

  4. 4.

    have both fought under this flag and are still serving under that flag…alongside them

  5. 5.

    indigenous australians are doing the very same as it was in my day…we are one

  6. 6.

    when it comes to this nations very proud heritage…you calling me a racist/ now that

  7. 7.

    has to be curtailed young lady you are the biggest biggot, lier and bullshit artist I

  8. 8.

    have ever had the misfortune to hear about… If you were in front of me right now I

  9. 9.

    would slap you down and kick you lilly livid arse until your nose bleeds

  10. 10.

    woman..where do you get off calling me and my fellow compatriots racists for flying

  11. 11.

    a flag on the national day, where does your patriotism lie??? it certainly does not

  12. 12.

    lay within the country you now reside in!!!

  13. 13.

    and If I were you(thank god I am not) I would be looking over my shoulder because

  14. 14.

    somewhere along the line you my dear lady will get your upcomings for sure

  15. 15.

    The ire of the land will surely pays its respects to you and your kind…

  16. 16.

    and you call yourself a doctor hahahaha you nothing but a media seeking junkie tree

  17. 17.

    hugging hippy bitch who needs a good slap and a kick up the arse

  18. 18.

    LB

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fozdar, F. (2021). Flagging Exclusionary Nationalism. In: Wagner, A., Marusek, S. (eds) Flags, Color, and the Legal Narrative. Law and Visual Jurisprudence, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32865-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32865-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32864-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32865-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics