Skip to main content

Communication and Trust: A Linguistic Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Trust in a Digital World

Abstract

In times of shifting media, communication shifts as well. With these changes, today we observe a fundamental change in trust attribution away from formerly established systems. Institutions and the classic media have been sources of trust for a long time but recipients nowadays would rather trust their family, friends, and even strangers with Rachel Botsman having shaped the term “Distributed Trust” to refer to this phenomenon. If it is no longer institutions people trust in, they trust individuals which bears the danger of arbitrariness as these individuals are not backed and monitored by any institutional tradition, reputation, or control. This becomes even more critical as (social) media paves the way for a tremendous amount of individuals to position themselves quickly and effortlessly on numerous channels 24/7. Whilst being exposed to this kind of sensory overload, people do not only have to consider whom to trust and whom not to multiple times a day, they furthermore have to decide at once. What does it take to assign or deny trust though? This article is concerned with the how exactly trust and communication are intertwined: Is it the voice itself which demands for trust or rather the content? If so, how does that content have to be structured to evoke trust? How is trust transported linguistically? And what role does the listener hold? As the established question is multi-layered, it is crucial to first define trust and the character traits that form it. Hereinafter—and only focusing on spoken language—paraverbal, nonverbal as well as content-related features leading to a development of trust on the listener’s side are compiled and described to answer the question “How can communication be utilized to build trust?”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Speech and Communication will be used as synonyms throughout this article as communication contains speech in its verbal and nonverbal form.

  2. 2.

    This figure does not display the recipient of a given message despite their great importance because it is, for now, only concerned with building trust on the speaker’s side.

  3. 3.

    Note: speaking rate is language-dependent, values may therefore change in comparison; the here listed numbers are representative for German.

  4. 4.

    The study was conducted in a clinical environment with patient’s parents in the PICU. Findings can nonetheless be seen as being generally valid even outside this setting as the communicative behaviour resembles crisis communication and is therefore an exemplary extreme case of building trust by means of communication.

References

  • Adler RF, Iacobelli F, Gutstein Y (2015) Are you convinced? A Wizard of Oz study to test emotional vs. rational persuasion strategies in dialogues. Comput Hum Behav 57(April 2016):75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir V, Barlow DM (2007) The age of suspicion. In: Bakir V, Barlow DM (eds) Communication in the age of suspicion. Trust and the media. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie G, Ellis AW (2017) The psychology of language and communication. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger T, Engel C, Meuret S, Fuchs M (2014) Alters- und geschlechtsspezifische Normwerte für Sprechstimmprofile in der Allgemeinbevölkerung: Erste Ergebnisse aus der Leipziger LIFE- Adult-Studie, 31. Wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie (DGPP) zusammen mit dem 5. Pädakustiker-Symposium der Akademie für Hörgeräte-Akustik. Viewed 21 Mar 2018, from http://www.egms.de/static/en/meetings/dgpp2014/14dgpp24.shtml

  • Botsman R (2018) Q&A: Rachel Botsman on the third trust revolution. Digit Bus Lawyer 20(2):10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Braet AC (1992) Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: a re-examination. Argumentation 6(3):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon J, Birk T, Pfau M (1990) Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Hum Commun Res 17(1):140–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone T (1975) Stylistic variables as related to source credibility: a content analysis approach. Speech Monogr 42(1975):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comadena ME, Hunt SK, Simonds CJ (2007) The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Commun Res Rep 24(3):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLemos D, Chen M, Romer A, Brydon K, Kastner K (2010) Building trust through communication in the intensive care unit: HICCC*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11(3):378–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke U (2016) Logopädisches Handlexikon. UTB, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard C (2012) Sprechtempo im Sprachvergleich: Eine Untersuchung phonologischer und kultureller Aspekte anhand von Nachrichtensendungen. Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton MA, Hunter JE, Burgoon M (1990) An empirical test of an axiomatic model of the relationship between language intensity and persuasion. J Lang Soc Psychol 9(1990):235–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer SS, Teufel-Dietrich A (2017) Stimmtherapie mit Erwachsenen: Was Stimmtherapeuten wissen sollten. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz SD, Miron MS, Johnson BT (1992) Source credibility and the language of expert testimony. J Appl Soc Psychol 22(1992):1909–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackob N, Roessing T, Petersen T (2011) The effects of verbal and nonverbal elements in persuasive communication: findings from two multi-method experiments. Communications 36(2011):245–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(2005):673–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mika S (1981) Some determinants of source credibility. Pol Psychol Bull 12(1981):79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Montrey J (2005) An investigation of the effects of speakers’ vocal characteristics on ratings of confidence and persuasion. Ph.D. thesis, University of Central Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostermeier H (1967) Effects of type and frequency of reference upon perceived source credibility and attitude change. Speech Monogr 34(1967):137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters J, Hoetjes M (2017) The effect of gesture on persuasive speech. Proc Interspeech 2017:659–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pompino-Marschall B (2009) Einführung in die Phonetik. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch NL Jr (1974) Figurative language and source credibility: a preliminary investigation and reconceptualization. Hum Commun Res 1(1974):75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Levine D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJ (eds) Communicating risks to the public. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rompf SA (2015) Trust and rationality. An integrative framework for trust research. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A, Hirschberg J (2005) Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech. INTERSPEECH-2005, pp 513–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manage Rev 23(3):393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer LJ, Ziegler TE, Pollak SD (2010) Social vocalizations can release oxytocin in humans. Proc R Soc B 277:2661–2666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer LJ, Prososki AR, Ziegler TE, Pollak SD (2012) Instant messages vs. speech: hormones and why we still need to hear each other. Evol Hum Behav 33(1):42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim HS, Park S, Chatterjee M, Scherer S, Sagae K, Morency L-P (2015) Acoustic and paraverbal indicators of persuasiveness in social multimedia. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp 2239–2243

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1994) Extracts from thought and language and mind in society. In: Stierer B, Maybin J (eds) Language, literacy, and learning in educational practice: a reader. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf B (1940) Science and linguistics. Technol Rev 42(6):229–231, 247–248, 207–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna-Maria Meck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meck, AM. (2019). Communication and Trust: A Linguistic Analysis. In: Osburg, T., Heinecke, S. (eds) Media Trust in a Digital World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30774-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics