Skip to main content

A Contemporary History of Healthcare Simulation Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Healthcare Simulation Research

Abstract

This chapter reviews the major developments and milestones in simulation research over the last 20 years. While we acknowledge that simulation has many applications outside education, our focus in this chapter is on documenting contemporary history with a strong education focus. We first outline major developments in medicine and nursing. We consider different approaches to research. We note the importance of the role of professional societies and associations in the dissemination of healthcare simulation research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Owen H. Simulation in healthcare education: an extensive history. Cham: Springer; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Killian G. On direct endoscopy of the upper air passages and oesophagus; its diagnostic and therapeutic value in the search for and removal of foreign bodies. Br Med J. 1902;2:560–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nestel D. Open access publishing in health and social care simulation research – advances in simulation. Adv Simul. 2016;1:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaba DM. Improving anesthesiologists’ performance by simulating reality. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(4):491–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, Smith BE, Fish KJ, Botney R. Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(1):8–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman AA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McGaghie WC, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gould D, Patel A, Becker G, Connors B, Cardella J, Dawson S, Glaiberman C, Kessel D, Lee M, Lewandowski W, Phillips R, Reekers J, Sacks D, Sapoval MK, Scerbo M. SIR/RSNA/CIRSE joint medical simulation task force strategic plan executive summary. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:953–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Healy GB. The college should be instrumental in adapting simulators to education. Bull Am Col Surg. 2002;87(11):10–1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills—changes in the wind. New Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2664–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003 Aug 1;78(8):783–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating: simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Ed Per. 2005;26(2):96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jeffries PR. The NLN Jeffries simulation theory. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hayden J, Smiley R, Alexander MA, Kardong-Edgren S, Jeffries P. The NCSBN national simulation study: a longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. J Nurs Regul. 2014;5(2 Supplement):S1–S64.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McGaghie WC, et al. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(Suppl):S42–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaba D. Expert’s Corner: Research in Healthcare Simulation. In: Palaganas J, et al., editors. Defining excellence in simulation programs. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. p. 607.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Regehr G. It’s NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 2010;44:31–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. INACSL standards of best practice: simulation. Retrieved on 20 November 2018 on the WWW from https://www.inacsl.org/inacsl-standards-of-best-practice-simulation/history-of-the-inacsl-standards-of-best-practice-simulation/

  20. Lewis K, et al. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP). Adv Simul. 2017;2:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nestel D, Kelly M. Strategies for research in healthcare simulation. In: Nestel D, et al., editors. Healthcare simulation education: evidence, theory and practice. West Sussex: Wiley; 2018. p. 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bond WF, et al. The use of simulation in emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(4):353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Issenberg SB, et al. Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education: a synthesis of the outcome from an Utstein style meeting. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(3):155–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dieckmann P, Phero JC, Issenberg SB, Kardong-Edgren S, Østergaard D, Ringsted C. The first research consensus summit of the society for simulation in healthcare: conduction and a synthesis of the results. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(Suppl):S1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stefanidis D, et al. Research priorities in surgical simulation for the 21st century. Am J Surg. 2012;203(1):49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. INSPIRE. INSPIRE network report 2014–2015. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng A, et al. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul. 2016;1:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Sup. 1):i2–i10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scerbo MW, Anderson BL. Medical simulation. In: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012. p. 557–71.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Scerbo MW. Simulation in healthcare: Growin’ up. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:232–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nestel D. Ten years of simulation in healthcare: a thematic analysis of editorials. Simul Healthc. 2017;12:326–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cant RP, Levett-Jones T, James A. Do simulation studies measure up? A simulation study quality review. Clin Sim in Nurs. 2018;21:23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cantrell MA, Franklin A, Leighton K, Carlson A. The evidence in simulation-based learning experiences in nursing education and practice: an umbrella review. Clin Sim in Nurs. 2016;13:634–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Doolen J, Mariani B, Atz T, Horsely TL, O’Rourke J, McAfee K. High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: a review of simulation reviews. Clin Sim in Nurs. 2016;12:290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mariani B, Fey MK, Gloe D. The simulation research rubric: a pilot study evaluating published simulation studies. Clin Sim in Nurs. 2018;22:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fey MK, Gloe D, Mariani B. Assessing the quality of simulation-based research articles: a rating rubric. Clin Sim in Nurs. 2015;11:496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levind RB, Kern DE, Wright T. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007;298:1002–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Walsh C, Lydon S, Byrne D, Madden C, Fox S, O’Connor P. The 100 most cited papers on healthcare simulation: a bibliometric review. Simul Healthc. 2018;13:211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Nestel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nestel, D., Scerbo, M.W., Kardong-Edgren, S.E. (2019). A Contemporary History of Healthcare Simulation Research. In: Nestel, D., Hui, J., Kunkler, K., Scerbo, M., Calhoun, A. (eds) Healthcare Simulation Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics