Skip to main content

‘You Must Wait to Be Asked’: Career Advancement and the Maternal Body

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education ((GED))

Abstract

Research demonstrates consistently how the route to professor is gendered. Structural inequalities within academic systems can make it hard for women to achieve the status of Chair. It has been argued, for example, that women academics may be judged on their ‘maternal bodies’ (or their potential for reproduction) rather than on performance. Relatedly, women’s commitment to the academy might be questioned due to unfair and unsubstantiated institutional assumptions that female scholars may at some point in their career prioritize parenting over employment (irrespective of whether they are in practice mothers). It has been shown, additionally, that women are less likely than men to be invited into career-advancing networks. Yet should women seek to pursue their own career advancement, they may be treated as ‘pushy’. Nevertheless, despite such structural barriers to career progression, some do reach professorial level. In this chapter, I share advice received from good colleagues, as well as some personal learning which helped move forward my research career. Acknowledging how some of these opportunities were serendipitous rather than strategic, I nevertheless embed such experiences within existing research on women in management, offering some personal thoughts on what might prove helpful, including the benefits of not waiting to be asked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, J. (2003). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In R. Ely, E. Foldy, & M. Scully (Eds.), Reader in gender, work and organization (pp. 49–61). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, K. L. (1999). Managing maternity leave: A qualitative analysis of temporary executive succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 240–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003). Nice girls don’t ask. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2009). Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2019). Turner prize: Lubaina Himid told ‘Black people don’t make art’. BBC News Online. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48485172. Accessed 2 June 2019.

  • BBC Radio 4, Lubaina Himid, & Artist. Desert Island Discs https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0005mfp Accessed 2 June 2019.

  • Bendl, R. (2008). Gender subtexts—Reproduction of exclusion in organizational discourse. British Journal of Management, 19, S50–S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, V., & Gatrell, C. (2017). Knowing her place: Positioning women in science. London: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. (2009). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, A., & Simpson, R. (2011). 25 years on: Reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 470–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling: The woman manager. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2004). Successful research careers: A practical guide. New York, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dex, S., Joshi, H., Macran, S., & McCulloch, A. (1998). Women’s employment transitions around childbearing. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60(1), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equal Opportunities Commission. (2007). Sex and power: Who runs Britain? London: Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotaki, M. (2013). No woman is like a man (in academia): The masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1251–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotaki, M., & Pullen, A. (2019). Introducing affective embodiment and diversity. In M. Fotaki & A. Pullen (Eds.), Diversity, affect and embodiment in organizing (pp. 1–19). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (2010). Organization studies: A space for ideas, identities and agonies. Organization Studies, 31(6), 757–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C. (2005). Hard labour: The sociology of parenthood. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C. J. (2007). A fractional commitment? Part-time work and the maternal body. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 462–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C. J. (2011). ‘I’m a bad mum’: Pregnant presenteeism and poor health at work. Social Science and Medicine, 72(4), 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C. J. (2013). Maternal body work: How women managers and professionals negotiate pregnancy and new motherhood at work. Human Relations, 66(5), 621–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C. (2017). Boundary creatures? Employed, breastfeeding mothers and ‘abjection as practice’. Organization Studies, 31(3), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, C., Cooper, C. L., & Kossek, E. E. (2017). Maternal bodies as taboo at work: New perspectives on the marginalizing of senior-level women in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., Ladge, J., & Clair, J. (2009). Negotiating pregnancy at work: Public and private conflicts. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., Clair, J., & Ladge, J. J. (2019). A feminist perspective on conducting personally relevant research: Working mothers studying pregnancy and motherhood at work. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0087.

  • Hakim, C. (1996). Key issues in women’s work: Female heterogeneity and the polarisation of women’s employment. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29(4), 428–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (2006). Whose story is it anyway? Narrative accounts of the role of women in founding and establishing family businesses. International Small Business Journal, 24(3), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. (2006). Linking narrative and identity construction: Using autobiography in accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(4), 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennekam, S. (2016). Identity transition during pregnancy: The importance of role models. Human Relations, 69(9), 1765–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennekam, S., Syed, J., Ali, F., & Dumazert, J. P. (2019). A multilevel perspective of the identity transition to motherhood. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(7), 915–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, L. M. (2004). Black and white women managers: Access to opportunity. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huopalainen, A. S., & Satama, S. T. (2019). Mothers and researchers in the making: Negotiating ‘new’ motherhood within the ‘new’ academia. Human Relations, 72(1), 98–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höpfl, H. (2000). The suffering mother and the miserable son: Organizing women and organizing women’s writing. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(2), 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höpfl, H., & Atkinson, P. H. (2000). The future of women’s career. In A. Collin & R. A. Young (Eds.), The future of career (pp. 130–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1994). Motherhood and management. In M. Tanton (Ed.), Women in management: A developing presence (pp. 141–161). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Clarke, C. A. (2013). It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life: Fragile academic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies, 35(3), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladge, J. J., Clair, J. A., & Greenberg, D. (2012). Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1449–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, R. (2001). Bodies: Exploring fluid boundaries. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, R. (2008). Maternities: Gender, bodies and space. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavin, S., Grandy, G., & Williams, J. (2014). Experiences of women elite leaders doing gender: Intra-gender micro-violence between women. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2005). Making sense of motherhood: A narrative approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, A. (2005). Reconceiving pregnancy and childcare: Ethic, experience and reproductive labour. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2019). Writing for academic journals (4th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2009). Writing retreat as structured intervention: Margin or mainstream? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatli, A., & Bell, M. P. (2011). Work–life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, K., & Letherby, G. (2006). The experience of academic non-mothers in the gendered university. Gender, Work & Organization, 13(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. M. (2007). Women on Wall Street: Despite diversity measures, Wall Street remains vulnerable to sex discrimination charges. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. K. (2010). “I feel as if I am the one who is disabled”: The emotional impact of changed employment trajectories of mothers caring for children with disabilities. Gender & Society, 24(5), 672–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio) ethics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (2000). Teaching managers about masculinities: Are you kidding? Management Learning, 31(1), 68–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. L. B., & Nkomo, S. M. (2003). Our separate ways: Black and white women and the struggle for professional identity. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, V., & Elliott, C. (2009). Women’s leadership. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, E. (2005). On bodies, rhinestones, and pleasures: Women teaching managers. Management Learning, 36(3), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, M. (1994). Women in management: A developing presence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuten, T. L., & August, R. A. (2006). Work-family conflict: A study of lesbian mothers. Women in Management Review, 21(7), 578–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2000). Reframing pregnant embodiment. In S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil, & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Transformations: Thinking through feminism (pp. 288–301). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Amsterdam, N. (2014). Othering the ‘leaky body’: An autoethnographic story about expressing breast milk in the workplace. Culture and Organization, 21(3), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinnicombe, S., & Bank, J. (2003). Women with attitude. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S., & Brewis, J. (2004). Matter over mind? Examining the Experience of Pregnancy. Sociology, 38(2), 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruffe-Burton, H., & Bairstow, S. (2013). Countering heteronormativity: Exploring the negotiation of butch lesbian identity in the organisational setting. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 28(6), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkowitz, C. (2006). Bodies at work. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Gatrell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gatrell, C. (2019). ‘You Must Wait to Be Asked’: Career Advancement and the Maternal Body. In: Murray, R., Mifsud, D. (eds) The Positioning and Making of Female Professors. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26187-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26187-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26186-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26187-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics