Abstract
Generational differences have been widely discussed; attention to and speculation on the characteristics of the Millennial Generation are especially abundant as they pertain to the use of educational technology for education and training. A careful review of the current popular and academic literature reveals several trends. First, whether based on speculation or research findings, discussion has focused on traits of the newer generations of students and workers and how their needs, interests and learning preferences can be met using new media, innovative instructional design and digital technologies. Second, generally speaking, although in the past few years there have been more critical and diverse perspectives on the characteristics of the Millennial Generation reported in the literature than before, more substantive studies in this area are still necessary. This chapter discusses trends and findings based upon the past 10 years’ literature on generational differences, the Millennial Generation, and studies and speculations regarding school and workplace technology integration that is intended to accommodate generational differences. There is still a lack of consensus on the characteristics of the newer generation sufficient to be used as a solid conceptual framework or as a variable in research studies; thus, research in this area demands an ongoing, rigorous examination. Instead of using speculative assumptions to justify the adoption of popular Web 2.0 tools, serious games and the latest high tech gear to teach the Millennial Generation, approaches to integrating technology in instruction, learning, and performance should be determined by considering the potential pedagogical effectiveness of a technology in relation to specific teaching, learning and work contexts. Clearly, today’s higher education institutions and workplaces have highly diverse student bodies and work forces, and it is as important to consider the needs of older participants in learning with technology as it is to consider those of the younger participants. Recommendations for future research and practices in this area conclude the chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (Or, don’t trust anyone under 30). New York, NY: Tarcher.
Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the digital natives debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331.
*Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital learners in higher education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning Technology, 37(1). Retrieved from http://www/cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/550
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Caruso, J. B., & Kvavik, R. B. (2005). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: Convenience, connection, control and learning. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS0506/ekf0506.pdf
Charsky, D., Kish, M. L., Briskin, J., Hathaway, S., Walsh, K., & Barajas, N. (2009). Millennials need training too: Using communication technology to facilitate teamwork. TechTrends, 53(6), 42–48.
Coinsidine, D., Horton, J., & Moorman, G. (2009). Teaching and reading the Millennial Generation through media literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(6), 471–481.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Zúñiga, H. G. D. (2010). Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253.
Eisenberg, M. (2008). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39–47.
Elmore, T. (2010). Generation iY: Our last chance to save their future. Norcross, GA: Poet Gardener Publishing.
Goldberg, B., & Pressey, L. C. (1928). How do children spend their time? The Elementary School Journal, 29(4), 273–276.
Hanewald, R. (2008). Confronting the pedagogical challenge of cyber safety. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 1–16.
Head, A., & Eisenberg, M. (2010). Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age (Project Information Literacy Progress Report). Seattle, WA: University of Washington’s Information School. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf
Howe, N., & Nadler, R. (2012). Why generations matter: Ten findings from LifeCourse Research on the Workforce. Retrieved from http://www.lifecourse.com/services/generations-in-the-workforce/white-paper.html
*Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Company.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2011, December 22). NETS for students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-student-standards-2007.aspx
Jackson, M. (2009). Distracted: The erosion of attention and the coming dark age. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 693–719). New York, NY: Macmillan.
*Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., et al. (2009). Educating the net generation: A handbook of findings for practice and policy. Retrieved from http://www.netgen.unimelb.edu.au/outcomes/handbook.html
Kim, B., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35(3), 207–256.
Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2010). The m-factor: How the millennial generation is rocking the workplace. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Martin, C. A., & Tulgan, B. (2002). Managing the generational mix. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M.-J., & MacFadden, R. (2011). Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(5), 5–14.
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net Gen. Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE.
*Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
*Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
*Reeves, T. C., & Oh, E. (2007). Generation differences and educational technology research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 295–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6–11.
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2 media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds: A Kaiser Family Foundation study. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf
Rosen, L. D. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the igeneration and the way they learn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stout, H. (2010, October 15), Toddlers’ favorite toy: The iPhone. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/fashion/17TODDLERS.html?pagewanted=all
Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
*Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—and more miserable than ever before . New York, NY: Free Press.
*Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. New York, NY: Free Press.
van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
Word (Version 2010) [Microsoft Office 2010]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the class of veterans, boomers, x-ers, and nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: AMACON.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oh, E., Reeves, T.C. (2014). Generational Differences and the Integration of Technology in Learning, Instruction, and Performance. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3184-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3185-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)