Abstract
Who was first to develop the themes of the First and Second Days of the Discorsi? According to Fr. Guido Grandi, a monk of Camaldoli, it was Vincenzo Viviani, Galileo’s favorite pupil. As we shall see, the matter is not quite so simple, and Grandi cannot be considered impartial. In fact, Viviani had published nothing before the discussion on the resistance of solids exploded, with considerable eclat, in Italy and France. All the same, Grandi’s reasons for this claim are significant, and they may provide a good introduction to the debate that arose as early as the 1640s about the physical (or even metaphysical) causes of resistance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Footnote
Cf. Grandi’s commentary on Viviani’s treatise, published in G. Galilei, Opere, 2d ed. (Florence, 1718), Vol. 3, p. 201.
E. Torricelli, Lezioni accademiche (Florence, 1715), preface, pp. xxv-xxviii.
Galileo, Opere, Vol. 14, pp. 157–160.
See for example C. de Waard, L’experience barométrique (Thouars, 1936).
M. Mersenne, Correspondance du P. Marin Mer senne, religieux Minime…, ed. C. de Waard (Paris, 1936), Vol. 2, pp. 282–283.
Letter to Jean Rey, Sept. 1, 1631
P. Duhem, “Le Père Marin Mersenne et la pesanteur de l’air,”Revue générale des sciences (1906), p. 774.
R. Lenoble, Mersenne ou la naissance du mécanisme (Paris, 1971).
P. Gassendi, Epicuri Philosophia. Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii (Lyons, 1649).
M. Mersenne, Harmonie universelle (Paris, 1636), first preface.
M. Mersenne, “Reflectiones physico-mathematicae,” in Novarum observationum physico-mathematicarum F. M.M. Minimi, Book 3 (Paris, 1647) (hereafter cited as Mersenne, Reflectiones), p. 150.
P. Musschenbroek, “Introductio ad cohaerentiam corporum firmorum,” in Physicae experimentales, et geometricae, de magnete, tuborum capillarium vitre-orumque speculorum attractione, magnitudine Terrae, cohaerentia corporum firmorum dissertationes: ut et ephemeri des meteorologicae ultrajectinae (Leiden, 1729), p. 506.
M. Mersenne, Cogitata physico-mathematica, in quibus tarn naturae quam artis effectus admirandi certissimis demonstrationibus explicantur (Paris, 1644), Book 1, Art. 4, Prop. I, p. 271.
Mersenne, Reflectiones, p. 150.
Ibid., p. 149.
Ibid., p. 150.
Ibid.
Ibid.
R. Descartes, Epistolae (Amsterdam, 1668), Vol. 2, p. 277.
R. Descartes, Principia philosophiae (Amsterdam, 1644), Part 2, sections 4–7.
Ibid., section 16.
F. Redi, “Osservazioni… intorno a quelle gocciole o fill di vetro, che rotte in qualsisia parte tutte quante si stritolano,” in Rossetti, op. cit.
Rossetti, Composizione, p. 1.
Ibid., p. 2.
Ibid., p. 4.
Ibid., pp. 4–5.
Ibid., p. 10.
Ibid., p. 13.
Ibid., p. 16.
Ibid., p. 17.
Ibid., p. 18.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 21.
I. Newton, Optice: sive de reflexionibus, refractionibus, inflexionibus et coloribus lucis, (London, 1706), book 3, p. 322.
Ibid., p. 344.
Recueil de diverses pièces, sur la philosophie, la réligion naturelle, l’histoire, les mathématiques, etc. Par Messieurs Leibniz, Clarke, Newton, et autres auteurs célèbres (1719), 2d ed. (Amsterdam, 1740), Vol. 1, p. 61.
Ibid., p. 82.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 94.
Ibid., p. 95.
Ibid., p. 147.
Ibid., p. 150.
Ibid., p. 151.
Ibid., p. 99.
Ibid., p. 206.
I. Newton, Optics, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions and Colour of Light, 2d ed., London, 1717.
P. Musschenbroek, op. cit., p. 451.
J. Belgrado, De corporibus elasticis, disquisitio physico-mathematica (Parma, 1748); J. Riccati, “Verae et germanae virium elasticarum leges ex phaenomenis demonstratae,” De Bononiensi scientarium academia commentant Vol. 1(1747), p. 523.
J. Riccati, “Sistema delP Universe,” in Opere del Conte Jacopo Riccati (Lucca, 1761), Vol. 1, pp. 152–173.
L. Carnot, Principes généraux de l’équilibre et du mouvement (Paris, 1803).
A. Barré de Saint-Venant, Principes de mécanique fondés sur la cinématique (Paris, 1851).
H. Hertz, Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhang dargestellt (Leipzig, 1894).
G.R. Boscovich, De viribus vivis, dissertatio, etc. (Rome, 1745).
G.R. Boscovich, De continuitatis lege et ejus consectariis pertinentibus ad prima materiae elementa, eorumque vires, dissertatio (Rome, 1754).
G.R. Boscovich, De lege virium in natura existentium dissertatio (Rome, 1755) (hereafter cited as Boscovich, De lege virium).
G.R. Boscovich, “De materiae divisibilitate et prin-cipia corporum, dissertatio conscript a jam ab anno 1748, et nunc primum edita,” Memorie sopra la fisica (Lucca, 1757), Vol. 4.
Boscovich, De lege virium, p. 4.
Ibid., p. 12.
Ibid., pp. 11–12.
Ibid., p. 13.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 15.
Ibid., p. 37.
P.S. Laplace, Annales de chemie et de physique, Vol. 12 (1819).
S.D. Poisson, “Mémoire sur les surfaces élastiques,” Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences de l’Institut National (1814), pp. 167–225.
S.D. Poisson, Traité de mécanique (Paris, 1811), Vol. 1.
L. Navier, “Mémoire sur les lois de l’équilibre et du mouvement des solides élastiques,” Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut National Vol. 7 (1827), pp. 375–393.
A.L. Cauchy, “Sur l’équilibre et le mouvement d’un système de points matériels sollicités par des forces d’attraction ou de repulsion mutuelle,” Exercices de mathématiques (Paris, 1828) (hereafter cited as Cauchy, “Sur l’équilibre”) Vol. 3, pp. 188–212.
A.L. Cauchy, “De la pression ou tension dans un système de points matériels,” Exercices de mathématiques (Paris, 1828), Vol. 3, pp. 213–236.
S.D. Poisson, “Mémoire sur l’équilibre et le mouvement des corps élastiques,” Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences de l’Institut National (1829), pp. 357–627; see p. 361.
Cauchy, “Sur l’équilibre,” p. 190.
Ibid., pp. 203–205.
S.D. Poisson,“Mémoire sur l’équilibre et le mouvement des corps élastiques,” presented to the Académie Royale des Sciences, April 14, 1828, published in Mémoires de l’Institut, Vol. 8 (1829), pp. 357–570; see especially pp. 376–392.
A. Barré de Saint-Venant, “Sur la question de savoir s’il existe des masses continues et sur la nature probable des dernières particules des corps,” Société philomatique de Paris (1844), pp. 3–15. For a more detailed analysis of Saint-Venant’s arguments in favor of Boscovich’s theory, see E. Benvenuto, A. Becchi, “Sui principi di filosofia naturale che orientarono la ricerca di Saint-Venant,” in Omaggio a Giulio Ceradini (Rome, 1988), pp. 125–138
Cauchy, “Sur l’équilibre,” p. 201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benvenuto, E. (1991). First Studies on the Causes of Resistance. In: An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2982-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2982-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7745-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2982-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive