Abstract
The year 1967 marks the beginning of a period of self-critical activity in which Althusser takes his distance from some, though not all, of the concepts and theses of his essays of the early and mid — sixties. In the course of these self-criticisms, new theoretical positions emerge. As we shall see, these ‘new’ positions sometimes are genuinely new, but there is also some justification in the view of those commentators who have seen the later positions as a retreat — as a termination, in effect, of ‘Althusserianism’ as a distinct tendency of thought in Marxism.1 As Althusser himself comments, his self-critical work is not generated wholly ‘within theory’ — it has its ‘external sources’ in politics. Undoubtedly these external sources were, principally, the radical student movement of the late 1960s, culminating in the mass strikes and factory occupations of May 1968, and, connectedly, the Chinese ‘Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution’. For the students, and for many of the working class militants of the period, the response of the PCF to the ‘events’ of May ‘68 exposed it as not just incapable of offering revolutionary leadership but as an essentially conservative apparatus of control and containment of mass struggles. In the face of this assessment of the role of the PCF, and with the example of the Chinese cultural revolution in mind, some of Althusser’s former students and colleagues on the left of the PCF broke with the Party and were active in the formation of several small ‘Maoist’ groups and parties.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See, for an example of this, V. Descombes, Modern French Philosophy, trans. L. Scott-Fox and J. M. Harding (Cambridge, 1980), p.135.
See, for example, Rancière’s essay ‘On the Theory of Ideology (the Politics of Althusser)’, in Radical Philosophy, no.7, Spring 1974, pp.2–15. See also comments by myself and Ian Craib in Radical Philosophy, nos. 9 and 10, respectively.
‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’ in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (London, 1971), pp.121–73.
Althusser and Balibar, Reading Capital (London, 1970), p.8.
Althusser, For Marx (London, 1969), p.15.
Louis Althusser, Essays in Self-Criticism, trans. G. Lock (London, 1976).
Mao Tse-Tung, Selected Readings from the Works of (Peking, 1976), pp.70–108.
Essays in Self-Criticism, p.121.
See, on this, the very interesting essay by Balibar, ‘From Bachelard to Althusser: the Concept of “epistemological break”’, Economy and Society, vol. 7, no.3, Aug 1978, pp.207–37.
Essays in Self-Criticism, p.110.
V. I. Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (Moscow, 1970).The principal source for Althusser’s new conception of philosophy is the essay ‘Lenin and Philosophy’, but see also the interview, ‘Philosophy as a Revolutionary Weapon’, and ‘Lenin before Hegel’ collected together in the same volume, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.
See also Louis Althusser, Philosophie et Philosophie Spontanée des Savants (Paris, 1974).
An important commentary on this text, and the implications of Althusser’s ‘new’ conception of philosophy is T. O’Hagan, ‘Althusser: How to be a Marxist in Philosophy’, in G. H. R. Parkinson, ed., Marx and Marxisms (Cambridge, 1982).
See, for example, the foreward to Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays of June 1970.
See ch.7 of this book.
E. P. Thompson, for example. See ch.8 of this book.
Essays in Self-Criticism, p.121.
Ted Benton, ‘Natural Science and Cultural Struggle’, in J. Mepham and D. H. Ruben, eds, Issues in Marxist Philosophy, vol.II (Brighton, 1979), pp.101–142.
See Douglas Johnson, ‘Althusser’s Fate’, London Review of Books, 16 Apr–6 May 1981, pp.13–15.
Pamphlet issued by the Foreign Language Press (Peking, 1966), p.1.
Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, p.128.
Ibid, p.132.
Ibid, p.140.
See ch.6 of this book.
Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, p.141, footnote 12.
See E. Balibar, ‘Self Criticism — an Answer to Questions from “Theoretical Practice”’, in Theoretical Practice, no.7/8 Jan 1973, pp.56–72.
Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, p.160.
P. Q. Hirst, ‘Althusser’s Theory of Ideology’, in Economy and Society, vol. 5, no.4, Nov 1976, esp. pp.404ff.
This book, chs8 and 9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 Ted Benton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benton, T. (1984). Self-criticism and Revision. In: The Rise and Fall of Structural Marxism. Theoretical Traditions in the Social Sciences. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17548-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17548-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-31281-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17548-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)