Skip to main content

Abstract

The year 1967 marks the beginning of a period of self-critical activity in which Althusser takes his distance from some, though not all, of the concepts and theses of his essays of the early and mid — sixties. In the course of these self-criticisms, new theoretical positions emerge. As we shall see, these ‘new’ positions sometimes are genuinely new, but there is also some justification in the view of those commentators who have seen the later positions as a retreat — as a termination, in effect, of ‘Althusserianism’ as a distinct tendency of thought in Marxism.1 As Althusser himself comments, his self-critical work is not generated wholly ‘within theory’ — it has its ‘external sources’ in politics. Undoubtedly these external sources were, principally, the radical student movement of the late 1960s, culminating in the mass strikes and factory occupations of May 1968, and, connectedly, the Chinese ‘Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution’. For the students, and for many of the working class militants of the period, the response of the PCF to the ‘events’ of May ‘68 exposed it as not just incapable of offering revolutionary leadership but as an essentially conservative apparatus of control and containment of mass struggles. In the face of this assessment of the role of the PCF, and with the example of the Chinese cultural revolution in mind, some of Althusser’s former students and colleagues on the left of the PCF broke with the Party and were active in the formation of several small ‘Maoist’ groups and parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See, for an example of this, V. Descombes, Modern French Philosophy, trans. L. Scott-Fox and J. M. Harding (Cambridge, 1980), p.135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Rancière’s essay ‘On the Theory of Ideology (the Politics of Althusser)’, in Radical Philosophy, no.7, Spring 1974, pp.2–15. See also comments by myself and Ian Craib in Radical Philosophy, nos. 9 and 10, respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’ in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (London, 1971), pp.121–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Althusser and Balibar, Reading Capital (London, 1970), p.8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Althusser, For Marx (London, 1969), p.15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Louis Althusser, Essays in Self-Criticism, trans. G. Lock (London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mao Tse-Tung, Selected Readings from the Works of (Peking, 1976), pp.70–108.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Essays in Self-Criticism, p.121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, on this, the very interesting essay by Balibar, ‘From Bachelard to Althusser: the Concept of “epistemological break”’, Economy and Society, vol. 7, no.3, Aug 1978, pp.207–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Essays in Self-Criticism, p.110.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. I. Lenin, Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (Moscow, 1970).The principal source for Althusser’s new conception of philosophy is the essay ‘Lenin and Philosophy’, but see also the interview, ‘Philosophy as a Revolutionary Weapon’, and ‘Lenin before Hegel’ collected together in the same volume, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See also Louis Althusser, Philosophie et Philosophie Spontanée des Savants (Paris, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. An important commentary on this text, and the implications of Althusser’s ‘new’ conception of philosophy is T. O’Hagan, ‘Althusser: How to be a Marxist in Philosophy’, in G. H. R. Parkinson, ed., Marx and Marxisms (Cambridge, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example, the foreward to Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays of June 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See ch.7 of this book.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. P. Thompson, for example. See ch.8 of this book.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Essays in Self-Criticism, p.121.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ted Benton, ‘Natural Science and Cultural Struggle’, in J. Mepham and D. H. Ruben, eds, Issues in Marxist Philosophy, vol.II (Brighton, 1979), pp.101–142.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Douglas Johnson, ‘Althusser’s Fate’, London Review of Books, 16 Apr–6 May 1981, pp.13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pamphlet issued by the Foreign Language Press (Peking, 1966), p.1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, p.128.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid, p.132.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid, p.140.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See ch.6 of this book.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, p.141, footnote 12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See E. Balibar, ‘Self Criticism — an Answer to Questions from “Theoretical Practice”’, in Theoretical Practice, no.7/8 Jan 1973, pp.56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, p.160.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Q. Hirst, ‘Althusser’s Theory of Ideology’, in Economy and Society, vol. 5, no.4, Nov 1976, esp. pp.404ff.

    Google Scholar 

  29. This book, chs8 and 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Ted Benton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benton, T. (1984). Self-criticism and Revision. In: The Rise and Fall of Structural Marxism. Theoretical Traditions in the Social Sciences. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17548-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics