Skip to main content

Cell Viability Assays for 3D Cellular Constructs

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Cell Viability Assays

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2644))

  • 1548 Accesses

Abstract

In vitro models fall short of replicating the complex in vivo processes including cell growth and differentiation. For many years, molecular biology research and drug development have relied on the use of cells grown within tissue culture dishes. These traditional in vitro two-dimensional (2D) cultures fail to recapitulate the 3D microenvironment of in vivo tissues. Due to inadequate surface topography, surface stiffness, cell-to-cell, and cell-to-ECM matrices, 2D cell culture systems are incapable of mimicking cell physiology seen in living healthy tissues. These factors can also place selective pressure on cells that substantially alter their molecular and phenotypic properties. With these disadvantages in mind, new and adaptive cell culture systems are necessary to recapitulate the cellular microenvironment in a more accurate manner for drug development, toxicity studies, drug delivery, and much more. Newly developed biofabrication technologies capable of creating 3D tissue constructs can open new opportunities for cell growth and developmental modeling. These constructs show great promise in representing an environment that allows cells to interact with other cells and their microenvironment in a much more physiologically accurate manner. When transitioning from 2D to 3D systems, there is the need to translate common cell viability analysis techniques from that of 2D cell culture to these 3D tissue constructs. Cell viability assays are critical in evaluating the health of cells in response to drug treatment or other stimuli to better understand how these factors effect the tissue constructs. As 3D cellular systems become the new standard in biomedical engineering, this chapter provides different assays used to assess cell viability qualitatively and quantitatively in 3D environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kunz-Schughart LA, Freyer JP, Hofstaedter F, Ebner R (2004) The use of 3-D cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model. J Biomol Screen 9(4):273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057104265040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya S, Zhang Q, Carmichael PL, Boekelheide K, Andersen ME (2011) Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways. PLoS One 6(6):e20887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW, Byrnes G, Antilla A, Ferlay J, Renehan AG, Forman D, Soerjomataram I (2015) Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: analysis of the European Cancer Observatory. Eur J Cancer 51(9):1164–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen C, Teng Y (2020) Is it time to start transitioning from 2D to 3D cell culture? Front Mol Biosci 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00033

  5. Kapalczynska M, Kolenda T, Przybyla W, Zajaczkowska M, Teresiak A, Filas V, Ibbs M, Blizniak R, Luczewski L, Lamperska K (2018) 2D and 3D cell cultures – a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch Med Sci 14(4):910–919. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.63743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho WJ, Pham EA, Kim JW, Ng CW, Kim JH, Kamei DT, Wu BM (2010) Incorporation of multicellular spheroids into 3-D polymeric scaffolds provides an improved tumor model for screening anticancer drugs. Cancer Sci 101(12):2637–2643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01723.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drewitz M, Helbling M, Fried N, Bieri M, Moritz W, Lichtenberg J, Kelm JM (2011) Towards automated production and drug sensitivity testing using scaffold-free spherical tumor microtissues. Biotechnol J 6(12):1488–1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fetah K, Tebon P, Goudie M, Eichenbaum J, Ren L, Barros N, Nasiri R, Ahadian S, Ashammakhi N, Dokmeci M, Khademhosseini A (2019) The emergence of 3D bioprinting in organ-on-chip systems. Prog Biomed Eng 1:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ab23df

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dominijanni AJ, Devarasetty M, Forsythe SD, Votanopoulos KI, Soker S (2021) Cell viability assays in three-dimensional hydrogels: a comparative study of accuracy. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 27(7):401–410. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2021.0060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamiloglu S, Sari G, Ozdal T, Capanoglu E (2020) Guidelines for cell viability assays. Food Front 1(3):332–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G-Biosciences (2016) Alamar blue cell viability assay reagent. https://cdn.gbiosciences.com/pdfs/protocol/786-921_protocol.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2022

  12. ThermoFisher Scientific alamarBlueâ„¢ Cell Viability Reagent. https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/DAL1025. Accessed 21 May 2022

  13. Bonnier F, Keating ME, Wrobel TP, Majzner K, Baranska M, Garcia-Munoz A, Blanco A, Byrne HJ (2015) Cell viability assessment using the Alamar blue assay: a comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models. Toxicol In Vitro 29(1):124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.09.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walzl A, Unger C, Kramer N, Unterleuthner D, Scherzer M, Hengstschlager M, Schwanzer-Pfeiffer D, Dolznig H (2014) The resazurin reduction assay can distinguish cytotoxic from cytostatic compounds in spheroid screening assays. J Biomol Screen 19(7):1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057114532352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Riss TL, Moravec RA, Niles AL, Duellman S, Benink HA, Worzella TJ, Minor L (2004) Cell viability assays. In: Markossian S, Grossman A, Brimacombe K et al (eds) Assay guidance manual, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hannah R, Beck M, Moravec R, Riss T (2002) Celltiter-Gloâ„¢ luminescent cell viability assay: a sensitive and rapid method for determining cell viability. https://www.promega.com/~/media/Files/Resources/Cell%20Notes/cn002/CellTiter-Glo%20Luminescent%20Cell%20Viability%20Assay-%20A%20Sensitive.ashx. Accessed 21 May 2022

  17. Sanna T, Dallolio L, Raggi A, Mazzetti M, Lorusso G, Zanni A, Farruggia P, Leoni E (2018) ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations. BMC Infect Dis 18(1):583. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3505-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Mohns M (2019) How to choose a cell viability or cytotoxicity assay. https://www.promega.com/resources/guides/cell-biology/cell-viability. Accessed 21 May 2022

  19. Molecular Probes Invitrogen detection technologies (2005) Live/dead viability/cytotoxicity kit for mammalian cells. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/mp03224.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2022

  20. Dittmar R, Potier E, van Zandvoort M, Ito K (2012) Assessment of cell viability in three-dimensional scaffolds using cellular auto-fluorescence. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 18(3):198–204. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shay Soker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Congress, Z., Brovold, M., Soker, S. (2023). Cell Viability Assays for 3D Cellular Constructs. In: Friedrich, O., Gilbert, D.F. (eds) Cell Viability Assays. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2644. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3052-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3052-5_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3051-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3052-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics