Skip to main content

Extraction and Separation of Mycobacterial Proteins

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Mycobacteria Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2314))

Abstract

The extraction and separation of native mycobacterial proteins remain necessary for antigen discovery, elucidation of enzymes to improve rational drug design, identification of physiologic mechanisms, use as reagents for diagnostics, and defining host immune responses. In this chapter, methods for the manipulation of whole mycobacterial cells and culture exudates are described in detail as these methods are the requisite first steps towards native protein isolation. Specifically, several methods for the inactivation of viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis along with qualification assays are provided, as this is key to safe manipulation of cell pastes for downstream processes. Next, the concentration of spent culture filtrate media in order to permit separation of soluble, secreted proteins is described followed by the separation of mycobacteria extracellular vesicles (MEV) from the remaining soluble proteins in spent media. We then describe the generation of whole-cell lysate and facile separation of lysate into subcellular fractions to afford cell wall, cell membrane, and cytosol-enriched proteins. Due to the hydrophobic nature of cell wall and cell membrane proteins, several extraction protocols to resolve protein subsets (such as extraction with urea and SDS) are also provided. Finally, methods for separation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic proteins from both whole-cell lysate and spent culture media are included. While these methods were optimized for the manipulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cells, they have been successfully applied to extract and isolate Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium ulcerans, and Mycobacterium avium proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lalvani A, Pareek M (2010) A 100 year update on diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. Br Med Bull 93:69–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Auguste P, Tsertsvadze A, Pink J et al (2016) Accurate diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in children, people who are immunocompromised or at risk from immunosuppression and recent arrivals from countries with a high incidence of tuberculosis: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 20. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20380

  3. Targowski T, Chelstowska S, Plusa T (2014) IGRA as a predictive factor of silent pulmonary changes in individuals following exposure to tuberculosis. Lung 192:869–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-014-9637-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pai M, Behr M (2016) Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and interferon-gamma release assays. Microbiol Spectr 4. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.tbtb2-0023-2016

  5. Pai M, Denkinger CM, Kik SV et al (2014) Gamma interferon release assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:3–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00034-13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Salgame P, Geadas C, Collins L et al (2015) Latent tuberculosis infection – revisiting and revising concepts. Tuberculosis 95:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Russell TM, Green LS, Rice T et al (2017) Potential of high-affinity, slow off-rate modified aptamer reagents for Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins as tools for infection models and diagnostic applications. J Clin Microbiol 55:3072–3088. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00469-17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Golichenari B, Velonia K, Nosrati R et al (2018) Label-free nano-biosensing on the road to tuberculosis detection. Biosens Bioelectron 113:124–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delogu G, Manganelli R, Brennan MJ (2014) Critical research concepts in tuberculosis vaccine development. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu L, Zhang WJ, Zheng J et al (2014) Exploration of novel cellular and serological antigen biomarkers in the orfeome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:897–906. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.032623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shekhawat SD, Jain RK, Gaherwar HM et al (2014) Heat shock proteins: possible biomarkers in pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Hum Immunol 75:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2013.11.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallis RS, Kim P, Cole S et al (2013) Tuberculosis biomarkers discovery: developments, needs, and challenges. Lancet Infect Dis 13:362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehaffy C, Dobos KM, Nahid P, Kruh-Garcia NA (2017) Second generation multiple reaction monitoring assays for enhanced detection of ultra-low abundance Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptides in human serum. Clin Proteomics 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-017-9156-y

  14. Gcebe N, Hlokwe TM (2017) Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in South African wildlife: neglected pathogens and potential impediments for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00015

  15. Jenkins AO, Gormley E, Gcebe N et al (2018) Cross reactive immune responses in cattle arising from exposure to Mycobacterium bovis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Prev Vet Med 152:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.02.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamont EA, Janagama HK, Ribeiro-Lima J et al (2014) Circulating Mycobacterium bovis peptides and host response proteins as biomarkers for unambiguous detection of subclinical infection. J Clin Microbiol 52:536–543. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02433-13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Prevots DR, Shaw PA, Strickland D et al (2010) Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease prevalence at four integrated health care delivery systems. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:970–976. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201002-0310OC

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wentworth AB, Drage LA, Wengenack NL et al (2013) Increased incidence of cutaneous nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, 1980 to 2009: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc 88:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.06.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirschfield GR, McNeil M, Brennan PJ (1990) Peptidoglycan-associated polypeptides of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 172:1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.2.1005-1013.1990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Konigsberg WH, Henderson L (1983) Removal of sodium dodecyl sulfate from proteins by ion-pair extraction. Methods Enzymol 91:254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(83)91022-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by ATCC contract 2010-0516-0005 (a subcontract of NIH-NIAID Contract HHSN272201000027c) and ATCC contract 2016-0550-0002 (a subcontract of NIH-NIAID contract HHSN272201600013c. Original work is credited to NIH-NIAID Contract AI-75320.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen M. Dobos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Lucas, M. et al. (2021). Extraction and Separation of Mycobacterial Proteins. In: Parish, T., Kumar, A. (eds) Mycobacteria Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2314. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1460-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1460-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1459-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1460-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics