Abstract
Education is organic: it involves actions of individuals, interacting with one another within different contexts and environments in homes, in urban centres and rural settings, in classrooms, schools, regions, countries, and the world. Ecology is a study of interactions between organisms and interactions of organisms with their environments. In this book, we use the ecological metaphor as a conceptual and practical framework for broad-based research in education. The advantage of this metaphor is its interdisciplinary nature and its all encompassing ability to view multiple interrelated components of entire environments and how these impact on and affect one another and the entire system. We argue that the study of technology use and pedagogical innovations in education systems demands such an approach. The main purpose of this book is to explore where and how information and communication technology (ICT) has made significant educational impact on the goals, outcomes, and processes of education in different countries, and where this impact is clearly evident. Another purpose is to examine the strategies and policies at the school and system levels that appear to be the most effective in bringing about desired learning outcomes and processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
SITES, conducted under the auspices of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), consists of three independent modules: Module 1, the Indicators Module (school survey, with data collected in 1998/1999); Module 2, the Innovative Practices Module (case studies, collected during 2000/2001); and Module 3, the Survey Module, also known as SITES 2006 (school, teacher, and optional student survey, conducted in 2006/2006).
References
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Davis, N. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. M. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). Building schools for the future: Consultation on a new approach to capital investment. Retrieved from www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/3611/Building%20schools%20for%20the%20future.pdf
Drucker, P. (1994). Post-capitalist society. New York: HarperCollins.
EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (2001). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index. aspx?langno=1&nodeID=2877
Erstad, O. (2008). Changing assessment practices and the role of IT. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 181–194). New York: Springer.
Halverson, R., & Collins, A. (2006). Information technologies and the future of schooling in the United States. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 145–156.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (1998). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National educational technology standards for students (2nd ed.). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
Istance, D. (2008). Directions for schooling and educational innovation from recent OECD analyses. Paper presented at the Slovenian Presidency Conference on Promoting Innovation and Creativity: Schools’ Response to the Challenges of Future Societies, Brdo, Slovenia, 8–10 April. Retrieved from http://www.mss.gov.si/en/zakonodaja_in_dokumenti/events/conference_promoting_innovation_and_creativity/
Kozma, R. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
Kozma, R. (2005). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A white paper. San Francisco, CA: Intel Corporation. Retrieved from http://download.intel.com/education/wsis/ICT_Education_Reform_Economic_Growth.pdf
Kozma, R. (2008). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A conceptual framework. San Francisco, CA: Intel Corporation. http://download.intel.com/education/EvidenceOfImpact/Kozma_ICT_Framework.pdf
Law, N. (2008). Technology-supported pedagogical innovations: The challenge of sustainability and transferability in the information age. In C. H. Ng & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Reforming learning: Issues, concepts and practices in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 319–344). Dordrecht: Springer.
Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008a). Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 181–219). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008b). Pedagogical orientations in mathematics and science and the use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 121–179). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 9(3), 319–342.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oakes, J., Quartz, K., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (2002). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oblinger, D., & Hawkins, B. (2006). The myth about no significant difference: Using technology produces no significant difference. Educause Review, 41(6), 14–15.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). Learning for the 21st century: A report and MILE guide for 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/downloads/P21_Report.pdf
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Tucson: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (Eds.). (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life long learning: A worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement and The University of Twente.
Pierson, M. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413–430.
Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2003). Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2009). Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (2nd ed.). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
Russell, T. L. (n.d.). No significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved from http://nosignificantdifference.wcet.info/about.asp
Scoter, J. V. (2008). The potential of IT to foster literacy development in kindergarten. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 149–162). New York: Springer.
Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington: SCANS, US Department of Labor.
Singapore Ministry of Education. (1997). Masterplan for IT in education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mpite/index.html
Singapore Ministry of Education. (2002). Masterplan for IT in education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mp2/mp2.htm
Tarragó, F. R. (2009). National policies and practices on ICT in education: Catalonia, Spain. In T. Plomp, R. E. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education (2nd ed., pp. 135–152). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
UNESCO. (2008). UNESCO’s ICT competency standards for teachers: Towards ICT skills for teachers. Retrieved from http://cst.unesco-ci.org/sites/projects/cst/default.aspx
Voogt, J. M., & Knezek, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
Webb, M. (2008). Impact of IT on science education. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 133–148). New York: Springer.
Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Law, N., Yuen, A., Fox, R. (2011). An Ecological Metaphor for Researching Technology Use and Pedagogical Innovations. In: Educational Innovations Beyond Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71137-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71148-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)