Skip to main content

An Ecological Metaphor for Researching Technology Use and Pedagogical Innovations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Innovations Beyond Technology
  • 1180 Accesses

Abstract

Education is organic: it involves actions of individuals, interacting with one another within different contexts and environments in homes, in urban centres and rural settings, in classrooms, schools, regions, countries, and the world. Ecology is a study of interactions between organisms and interactions of organisms with their environments. In this book, we use the ecological metaphor as a conceptual and practical framework for broad-based research in education. The advantage of this metaphor is its interdisciplinary nature and its all encompassing ability to view multiple interrelated components of entire environments and how these impact on and affect one another and the entire system. We argue that the study of technology use and pedagogical innovations in education systems demands such an approach. The main purpose of this book is to explore where and how information and communication technology (ICT) has made significant educational impact on the goals, outcomes, and processes of education in different countries, and where this impact is clearly evident. Another purpose is to examine the strategies and policies at the school and system levels that appear to be the most effective in bringing about desired learning outcomes and processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    SITES, conducted under the auspices of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), consists of three independent modules: Module 1, the Indicators Module (school survey, with data collected in 1998/1999); Module 2, the Innovative Practices Module (case studies, collected during 2000/2001); and Module 3, the Survey Module, also known as SITES 2006 (school, teacher, and optional student survey, conducted in 2006/2006).

References

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. M. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). Building schools for the future: Consultation on a new approach to capital investment. Retrieved from www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/3611/Building%20schools%20for%20the%20future.pdf

  • Drucker, P. (1994). Post-capitalist society. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (2001). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index. aspx?langno=1&nodeID=2877

  • Erstad, O. (2008). Changing assessment practices and the role of IT. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 181–194). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, R., & Collins, A. (2006). Information technologies and the future of schooling in the United States. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (1998). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National educational technology standards for students (2nd ed.). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istance, D. (2008). Directions for schooling and educational innovation from recent OECD analyses. Paper presented at the Slovenian Presidency Conference on Promoting Innovation and Creativity: Schools’ Response to the Challenges of Future Societies, Brdo, Slovenia, 8–10 April. Retrieved from http://www.mss.gov.si/en/zakonodaja_in_dokumenti/events/conference_promoting_innovation_and_creativity/

  • Kozma, R. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2005). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A white paper. San Francisco, CA: Intel Corporation. Retrieved from http://download.intel.com/education/wsis/ICT_Education_Reform_Economic_Growth.pdf

  • Kozma, R. (2008). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A conceptual framework. San Francisco, CA: Intel Corporation. http://download.intel.com/education/EvidenceOfImpact/Kozma_ICT_Framework.pdf

  • Law, N. (2008). Technology-supported pedagogical innovations: The challenge of sustainability and transferability in the information age. In C. H. Ng & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Reforming learning: Issues, concepts and practices in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 319–344). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008a). Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 181–219). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008b). Pedagogical orientations in mathematics and science and the use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 121–179). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 9(3), 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J., Quartz, K., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (2002). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D., & Hawkins, B. (2006). The myth about no significant difference: Using technology produces no significant difference. Educause Review, 41(6), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). Learning for the 21st century: A report and MILE guide for 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/downloads/P21_Report.pdf

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Tucson: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (Eds.). (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life long learning: A worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement and The University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, M. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2003). Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2009). Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (2nd ed.). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. L. (n.d.). No significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved from http://nosignificantdifference.wcet.info/about.asp

  • Scoter, J. V. (2008). The potential of IT to foster literacy development in kindergarten. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 149–162). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington: SCANS, US Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Ministry of Education. (1997). Masterplan for IT in education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mpite/index.html

  • Singapore Ministry of Education. (2002). Masterplan for IT in education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mp2/mp2.htm

  • Tarragó, F. R. (2009). National policies and practices on ICT in education: Catalonia, Spain. In T. Plomp, R. E. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education (2nd ed., pp. 135–152). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2008). UNESCO’s ICT competency standards for teachers: Towards ICT skills for teachers. Retrieved from http://cst.unesco-ci.org/sites/projects/cst/default.aspx

  • Voogt, J. M., & Knezek, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. (2008). Impact of IT on science education. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 133–148). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Law .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Law, N., Yuen, A., Fox, R. (2011). An Ecological Metaphor for Researching Technology Use and Pedagogical Innovations. In: Educational Innovations Beyond Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics