Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodology Usage by Virtual Information Systems Development Teams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development

  • 1349 Accesses

Abstract

Organisational globalisation has strengthened the popularity of virtual information systems development (ISD) teams, by maximising the availability of resources. However, few studies investigate the practices of virtual ISD teams. This paper presents findings from a survey on the use of ISD methodologies by virtual ISD teams. Virtual ISD teams appear to employ the use of methodologies to a greater extent than do colocated teams. Teams employed a structured approach to the ISD process, following a methodology with clear emphasis on the importance of documentation and constant communication between team members. Conversely, ISD literature on colocated teams presents a view that methodologies are not wholly used and where they are used, a tailoring of the methodology takes place. The virtual teams involved in this study did not engage in a tailoring of methods during development. Most teams utilised an internally developed methodology specific to the organisation. The results lead to recommendations for future research into virtual ISD teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, M. K. and Galvin, J. E. (2003). Socialization in virtual groups, Journal of Management, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, pp. 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, S. (2002). Agile development best dealt with in small groups, Computing Canada, Vol. 28, Iss. 9, pp. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, H. P. (2002). A comparison of face-to-face and virtual software development teams, Team Performance Management, Vol. 8, Iss. 1/2, pp. 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J. H. E. and Verburg, R. M. (2004). ‘A model for the analysis of virtual teams’, In Virtual and Collaborative Teams. Process, Technologies and Practice, Edited by Godar, S. H. and Ferris, S. P., Idea Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, P. G. (2007). Agile... and Offshore, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50, Iss. 1, pp. 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R., Travis, J. and Truex, D. (1992). ‘Systems without method: The impact of new technologies on information systems development projects’, In The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, Edited by Kendall, J. E. and Kendall, K. E., Elsevier, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzoglou, P. D. and Macaulay, L. A. (1996). Requirements capture and IS methodologies, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. and Lehaney, B. (2000). Mixing methodologies for information systems development and strategy: A higher education case study, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 51, pp. 542–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, G. (2005). ‘An empirical study of software process in practice’, In Proceedings of 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connaughton, S. L. and Daly, J. A. (2004). ‘Leading from afar: Strategies for effectively leading virtual teams’, In Virtual and Collaborative Teams. Process, Technologies and Practice, Edited by Godar, S. H. and Ferris, S. P., Idea Group Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration, Organization Science, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. 346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D. (2002). Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 356–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organisational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science, Vol. 32, Iss. 5, pp. 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, A. D. (2002). Surveys in Social Research, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S. and Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams, Management Sciences, Vol. 46, Iss. 12, pp. 1554–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., Cuevas, H. M. and Bowers, C. A. (2003). Distribution coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team process and performance, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 4, Iss. 3/4, pp. 340–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B. (1997). The use of systems development methodologies in practice:A field study, Info Systems Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B. (1998). An empirical investigation into the adoption of systems development methodologies, Information and Management, Vol. 34, pp. 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, S., Blackburn, R. and Rosen, B. (1999). Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. and Hirschheim, R. (1996). Analyzing information systems development: A comparison and analysis of eight IS development approaches, Information Systems, Vol. 21, Iss. 7, pp. 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. J. (1999). Organizational change and virtual teams: strategic and operational integration, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanawattanachai, P. and Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, Iss. 3/4, pp. 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S. and Cummings, J. N. (2002). ‘What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research’, In Distributed Work, Edited by Hinds, P. J. and Kiesler, S., MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E. and Siegel, J. (2002). ‘Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support’, In Distributed Work, Edited by Hinds, P. J. and Kiesler, S., MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, L., Williams, L., Damian, D. and Bures, H. (2006). Essential communication practices for Extreme Programming in a global software development team, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 48, pp. 781–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual Teams. People working across boundaries with technology, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurey, J. S. and Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams, Information and Management, Vol. 38, pp. 523–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannix, E. A., Griffith, T. and Neale, M. A. (2002). ‘The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams’, In Distributed Work, Edited by Hinds, P. J. and Kiesler, S., MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiassen, L. and Purao, S. (2002). Educating reflective systems developers, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. and Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups Interacting with Technology, Sage, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenny, J. L., Zack, M. H. and Doherty, V. S. (1992). ‘Complementary communication media: A comparison of electronic mail and face-to-face communication in a programming team’, In Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Edited by Nohria, N.and Eccles, R. G., Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, J. and Wood-Harper, T. (2003). Information systems project management:The price of failure, Management Services, Vol. 47, Iss. 5, pp. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E. and Kramer, R. M. (1996). ‘Swift trust and temporary groups’, In Trust in Organisations: Frontiers of theory and research, Edited by Kramer, R. M. and Tyler,T. R., Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 166–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. and Hinds, P. J. (2002). ‘Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams’, In Distributed Work, Edited by Hinds, P. J. and Kiesler, S., MIT Press, London, pp. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandhakumar, J. and Avison, D. E. (1999). The fiction of methodological development: A field study of information systems development, Information Technology and People, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 176–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovaska, P. (2005). ‘Working with methods: Observations on the role of methods in systems development’, In Information Systems Development: Advances in Theory, Practice and Education, Edited by Vasilecas, O., Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovaska, P., Rossi, M. and Marttiin, P. (2003). Architecture as a coordination tool in multi-site software development, Software Process Improvement and Practice, Vol. 8, pp. 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, c. (2002). Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, N. L., Hightower, R. and Pearson, J. M. (1996). ‘The failure of methodologies to meet the needs of current development environments’, In Proceedings of 4th Annual Conference on Information Systems Methodologies, British Computer Society Information Systems Methodologies Specialist Group, University College Cork, Ireland, 12–14 Sept. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections. New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truex, D., Baskerville, R. and Travis, J. (2000). Amethodical systems development: The deferred meaning of systems development methods, Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Vol. 10, pp. 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D., France, R. and Rumbe, B. (2005). Assumptions underlying agile software-development processes, Journal of Database Management, Vol. 16, Iss. 4, pp. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walz, D. B., Elam, J. J. and Curtis, B. (1993). Inside a software design team: Knowledge acquisition, sharing and integration, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, Iss. 10, pp. 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynekoop, J. L. and Russo, N. L. (1993). ‘System development methodologies: Unanswered questions and the research-practice gap’, In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynekoop, J. L. and Russo, N. L. (1997). Studying system development methodologies: An examination of research methods, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y. and Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, pp. 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Brenda Mullally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larry Stapleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Mullally, B., Stapleton, L. (2009). Methodology Usage by Virtual Information Systems Development Teams. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Lang, M., Conboy, K., Barry, C. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_4

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_4

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

    • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30403-8

    • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68772-8

    • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation