Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anastasi, A. (1954). Contributions to differential psychology. New York: Macmillan.
Dubiel, H. (1985). Was ist Neokonservatismus? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1981). Left brain, right brain. New York: W.H. Freeman
Steiner, H. G. (1986) Sonderpädagogik für testsondierte “mathematisch hochbegabte” Schüler oder offene Angebote zur integrativ-differenzierenden Förderung mathematischer Bildung?” In Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 1986 (pp. 280–284). Bald-Salzdethfurth: Franzbecker.
References
Allardice, B. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). Children’s psychological difficulties in mathematics. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 319–350). New York: Academic Press.
Bartkovich, K. G., & George, W. C. (1980). Teaching the gifted and talented in the mathematics classroom. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Benbow, C. P. (1991). Mathematically talented children: Can acceleration meet their educational needs? In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 154–165). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Benton, A. L. (1987). Mathematical disabilities and the Gerstmann syndrome. In G. Deloche & X, Seron (Eds.), Mathematical disabilities (pp. 111–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bhattacharya, D. N. (1982). Gifted children in mathematics: Case studies. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York.
Brown, M. D. (1991). The relationship between traditional instructional methods, contract activity packages, and math achievement of fourth grade gifted students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Mississippi.
Brown, J. S., & Van Lehn, K. (1980). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. Cognitive Science, 4, 379–426.
Clendening, C. P., & Davies, R. A. (1983). Challenging the gifted — Curriculum enrichment and acceleration models. New York: Bowker.
Cox., L. S. (1975). Systematic errors in the four vertical algorithms in normal and handicapped population. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 202–220.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1977). Children’s arithmetic: The learning process. New York: Van Nostrand.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The development of mathematical thinking. New York: Academic Press.
Grissemann, H., & Weber, A. (1982). Spezielle Rechenstörungen — Ursachen und Therapie. Bern: Huber.
Hartje, W. (1987). The effect of spatial disorders on arithmetical skills. In G. Deloche & X. Seron (Eds.), Mathematical disabilities (pp. 121–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heller, K. A., & Feldhusen, J. F. (Eds.). (1986). Identifying and nurturing the gifted: An international perspective. Stuttgart: Huber.
House, P. A. (Ed.). (1987). Providing opportunities for the mathematically gifted, K-12. Reston: NCTM.
Jellen, H. G., & Verduin, J. R. (1986). Handbook for differential education of the gifted. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Johnson, D. J., & Myklebust, H. R. (1971). Lernschwächen — Ihre Formen und ihre Behandungen. Stuttgart: Hippokrates.
Klauer, K. J. (1992). In Mathematik mehr leistungsschwache Mädchen, im Lesen und Rechtschreiben mehr leistungsschwache Jungen? Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 24(1), 48–65.
Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 164–177.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lorenz, J. H. (1982). Lernschwierigkeiten im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule und Orientierungsstufe. In H. Bauersfeld, H.-W. Heymann, G. Krummheuer, J. H. Lorenz, & V. Reiß (Eds.), Analysen zum Unterrichtshandeln (pp. 168–209). Köln: Aulis.
Michael, W. B. (1977). Cognitive and affective components of creativity in mathematics and the physical sciences. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp. 141–172). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Niegemann, H. M. (1988). Neue Wege in der pädagogischen-Diagnostik: Fehleranalyse und Fehlerdiagnostik im Mathematikunterricht. Heilpadagogische Forschung, 14(2), 77–82.
Radatz, H. (1980). Fehleranalysen im Mathematikunterricht. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
Resnick, L. B. (1983). Toward a cognitive theory of instruction. In S. Paris, G. M. Olson, & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 5–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Resnick, L. B. (1984). Beyond error analysis: The role of understanding in elementary school arithmetic. In H. N. Cheek (Ed.), Diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics issues, ideas, and insights (pp. 2–14). Kent, OH: Research Council for Diagnostic and Prescriptive Mathematics
Resnick, L. B., & Neches, R. (1984). Factors affecting individual differences in learning ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 275–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Resnick, L.B., & Ford, W.W. (1981). The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snider, J. H. (1986). Designing a program for gifted mathematics students in junior high/middle schools. Doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University, Tennessee.
Stanley, J. C. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational accelaration. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp. 75–112). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1979). The study and facilitation of talent for mathematics. In NSSE (Eds.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development (pp. 169–185). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tarnopol, M., & Tarnopol, L. (1979). Brain function and arithmetic disability. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 1, 23–39.
Teyler, T. T. (1984). Brain functioning and mathematical abilities. In H. N. Cheek (Ed.), Diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics — Issues, ideas and insights (pp. 15–20). Kent, OH: Research Council for Diagnostic and Prescritive Mathematics.
Underhill, R. G. (1977). Teaching elementary school mathematics. Columbus, OH: Bell & Howell.
Wilmot, B. A. (1983). The design, administration, and analysis of an instrument which identifies mathematically gifted students in grades four, five and six. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
References
Baudelot, C., & Establet, R. (1992). Allez les filles! Paris: Seuil.
Becker, J. R. (1991). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. Paper presented at the invited symposium of the IOWME, Assisi, Italy.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Golderberg, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Brown, S. I. (1984). The logic of problem generation: From morality and solving to de-posing and rebellion. For the Learning of Mathematics, 4(1), 9–29.
Buerk, D. (1985). The voices of women making sense of mathematics. Journal of Education, 167(3), 59–70.
Damarin, S. K. (1990). Teaching mathematics: A feminist perspective. In T. J. Cooney & C. R. Hirsh (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s: 1990 Yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davis, K. (1992). Toward a feminist rhetoric: The Gilligan debate revisited. Women’s Studies International Forum, 15(2), 219–231.
Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 23(2), 95–103.
Felson, R. B., & Trudeau, L. (1991). Gender differences in mathematical performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(2), 113–126.
Fennema, E., & Peterson, P. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds), Gender influences in classroom interaction. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 185–213.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hanna, G. (1989). Mathematics achievement of girls and boys in grade eight: Results from twenty countries. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 225–232.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155.
Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women’s math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 198–214.
Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A., & Phillips, G. W. (1989). A world of differences: An international assessment of mathematics and science. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A., & Askew, J. M. (1992). Learning mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lee, L. (1989). Vers un enseignement des math’ematiques qui s’adresse aux femmes. In L. Lafortune (Ed.), Quelles diff&’erences? Montr’eal: Remue-m&’enage.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Walden, R., & Walkerdine, V. (1982). Girls and mathematics: The early years. Bedford Way Papers 8. London: University of London Institute of Education.
Walden, R., & Walkerdine, V. (1985). Girls and mathematics: From primary to secondary schooling. Bedford Way Papers 24. London: University of London Institute of Education.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington: AAAS.
College Entrance Examination Board Commission on Mathematics (1959). Program for college preparatory mathematics. New York: CEEB.
National Advisory Committee on Mathematical Education (NACOME) (1975). Overview and analysis of school mathematics: Grades K-12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1990). Algebra for everyone (edited by Edgar Edwards, Jr.). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Robitaille, D. F. (1989). Students’ achievements: Population A. In D. F. Robitaille & R. A. Garden (Eds.), The IEA study of mathematics II: Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics. Oxford: Pergamon.
Swetz, F. (1987). Capitalism and school arithmetic: The New Math of the 15th Century. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing Co..
Thurow, L. (1991, October). Public Investment. Paper presented at the Economic Policy Institute Conference on Public Investment. Washington, DC.
Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics I: Analysis of mathematics curricula. Oxford: Pergamon.
Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (1990, 1991, 1992). Transition mathematics. Algebra. Geometry. Advmnced algebra. Functions, statistics, and trigonometry. Precalculus and discrete mathematics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Usiskin, Z. (1987). Resolving the continuing dilemmas in geometry. In Learning and Teaching Geometry: The 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scholz, R.W. (1994). Differential Didactics. In: Biehler, R., Scholz, R.W., Strässer, R., Winkelmann, B. (eds) Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline. Mathematics Education Library, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47204-X_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47204-X_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2613-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47204-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive