Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of river channelization and riverfront development on fluvial habitat: evidence from Gomti River, a tributary of Ganges, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riverfront development is one of the important pervasive modifiers of river morphology and processes affecting river corridors, floodplains and associated riparian zones. The Irrigation and Water Resources Department of Government of Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state, undertook an ambitious project of riverfront development during April 2015 to March 2017 in the capital city of Lucknow on Gomti River, a meandering perennial tributary of Ganges which is fed by rainfall and groundwater. Under this project, straightening and shortening of the river channel was done by controlling its width, shape and riverbed through constructing a heavily reinforced diaphragm wall on both banks on an 8.1 km stretch. River floodplain width was restricted to 240 m out of 450 m and clear waterway to 100–125 m from existing 250 m to reclaim about 200 ha of land upstream and downstream of Gomti barrage in the city. This paper assesses the loss of river processes and ecosystems under changed hydraulic regimes post riverfront development project. We observed eight types of habitat in the undisturbed segments of the Gomti River, while only two major habitat types were present in the channelized segments. The paper argues that, due to heavy channel engineering led riverfront development and other related morphometric changes, there would be decline in freshwater species and water quality, lowering of groundwater tables in the city reach, resulting from diminishing base flow and flooding of the downstream areas. The river is fed by rainfall and groundwater, maintaining variable flow regimes with a very lean flow during the summer season. The reduction in flow, in the absence of water augmentation measures, will further impact the minimum environmental flows required to maintain the healthy ecosystems in the river broadening the area of ecological disturbances. This study can provide valuable insights for future projects on riverfront development and restoration measures in India and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

(Data source: CWC)

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

(Credit: CWC 2012)

Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:257–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Baattrup-Pederson A, Friberg N, Larsen SE, Riis T (2005) The influence of channelization on riparian plant assemblages. Freshw Biol 50:1248–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (1999) Aquatic habitat assessment. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, p 216

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay J (2017) Restoration of ecological status of Himalayan rivers in China and India: the case of the two mother rivers—The Yellow and the Ganges. In: Dong S, Bandyopadhyay J, Chaturvedi S (eds) Environmental sustainability from the Himalayas to the oceans: struggles and innovations in China and India. Springer, Cham, pp 69–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SP (1993) Manuel of methods in fish biology. South Asian Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley G, Reid H, Fryirs K, Trahan N (2010) What are we monitoring and why? Using geomorphic principles to frame eco-hydrological assessments of river condition. Sci Total Environ 408(9):2025–2033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker MP (1985) The ecological effects of channelization. Geogr J 151(1):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes A (1988) Channelized rivers—perspectives for environmental management. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary M, Mishra S, Kumar A (2017) Estimation of water pollution and probability of health risk due to imbalanced nutrients in River Ganga, India. Int J River Basin Manag 15(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (1998) Spatial arrangement of habitat patches and corridors: clues from ecological field experiments. Landsc Urban Plan 42(2–4):157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (2009) Ecology of fragmented landscapes. JHU Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon JC (1973) Fish populations of channelized and unchannelized sections of the Chariton River, Missouri. In: Schneberger E, Funk JL (eds) Stream channelization a symposium, vol 2. North Central Division, American Fisheries Society Special Publication, Bethesda, pp 52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubia JC, Rayburg S, Neave M (2016) The influence of local land use on the water quality of urban rivers. Int J GEOMATE 11(23):2155–2161

    Google Scholar 

  • CWC (2012) Gomti River basin water year book. Upper Ganga Basin Organisation, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, Lucknow

    Google Scholar 

  • Detenbeck NE, DeVore PW, Niemi GJ, Lima A (1992) Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Environ Manag 16(1):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewson ZS, James ABW, Death RG (2007) A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macro-invertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 26:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs P, Gregory K (2014) River channel management: towards sustainable catchment hydrosystems. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta V (2012) Land use dynamics and peri-urban growth characteristics: reflections on master plan and urban suitability from a sprawling north Indian city. Environ Urban Asia 3(2):277–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta V, Srivastava RK, Yunus M, Ahmed S, Pathak VV, Rai L, Prasad N (2011) Restoration plan of Gomti River with designated best use classification of surface water quality based on river expedition, monitoring and quality assessment. Earth Sci India 4:80–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta V, Kumar R, Sharma U (2015) Assessment of human-induced impacts on hydrological regime of Gomti river basin, India. Manag Environ Qual Int J 26(5):631–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvel WA, Volkmar RD (1976) Environmental impact of stream channelization. Water Resour Bull 12:799–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elser AA (1968) Fish populations of a trout stream in relation to major habitat zones and channel alterations. Trans Am Fish Soc 97:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etnier DA (1972) The effect of annual rechanneling on a stream fish population. Trans Am Fish Soc 101:372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everard M, Sharma OP, Vishwakarma VK, Khandal D, Sahu YK, Bhatnagar R, Kumar V (2018) Assessing the feasibility of integrating ecosystem-based with engineered water resource governance and management for water security in semi-arid landscapes: a case study in the Banas catchment, Rajasthan, India. Sci Total Environ 612:1249–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Luff ML, Lott DA (2002) The importance of exposed riverine sediments for phytophagous beetles (Coleoptera) in Scotland and northern England. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 12(5):553–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friberg N, Kronvang B, Svendsen LM, Hansen HO, Nielsen MB (1994) Restoration of a channelized reach of the River Gelså, Denmark: effects on the macroinvertebrate community. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 4(4):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KA, Eft JA, Lauer TE (2016) Morphology and its effect on habitat selection of stream fishes. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 121(1):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta BK (2011) Studies on fish diversity and aquatic habitat of river Gomti (U.P.) for biodiversity conservation and management. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Zoology, CCSU, Meerut, India

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DA, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RD (1971) Stream channelization effects on fishes and bottom fauna in the Little Sioux River, Iowa. In: Schneberger E, Funk JL (eds) Stream channelization, a symposium, vol 2. American Fisheries Society Special Publication, Bethesda, pp 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen DR, Muncy RJ (1971) Effects of stream channelization on fishes and bottom fauna in the Little Sioux River, Iowa. la. State Water Resources Res. Inst. Project No. A-035-1A

  • Hartson CA, Ilgen EL, Zaleski OS, Lindeman PV (2014) Effects of channelization on Sabine Map Turtle habitat in the Mermentau River drainage, Louisiana: use of original vs. new channels. Southeast Nat 13(1):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfield JM, Capon SJ, Nilsson C, Jansson R, Palm D (2007) Restoration of rivers used for timber floating: effects on riparian plant diversity. Ecol Appl 17(3):840–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood GA, Larson DG (2015) Ecological engineering and aquatic connectivity: a new perspective from beaver-modified wetlands. Freshw Biol 60(1):198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries P, King AJ, Koehn JD (1999) Fish, flows and floodplains: links between freshwater fishes and their environment in the Murray Darling River system, Australia. Environ Biol Fishes 56:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IITR (2013) Hydrological study for Gomti Riverfront Development prepared for Lucknow Development Authority. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson U (2013) Stream channelization effects on fish abundance and species composition. Master Thesis, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology Linköpings universitet. SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

  • Jurajda P (1995) Effect of channelization and regulation on fish recruitment in a flood plain river. River Res Appl 10(2–4):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kairo K, Haldna Timm H, Virro T (2017) The effect of channelization on the biological quality of lowland streams using macro invertebrates as proxies. Hydrobiologia 794:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Chu EW (1998) Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendle ER (1970) The effects of channelization in the Missouri River on fish and fish-food organisms. In: Nebraska game and parks commission: white papers, conference presentations and manuscripts, vol 23. Available at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamewhitepap/23

  • Kennedy TL, Turner TF (2011) River channelization reduces nutrient flow and macro invertebrate diversity at the aquatic terrestrial transition zone. Ecosphere 2(3):art35. https://doi.org/10.1890/es11-00047.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS, Dimri NK, Nawab A, Ilyas O, Gautam P (2014) Habitat use pattern and conservation status of smooth–coated otters Lutrogale perspicillata in the Upper Ganges Basin, India. Anim Biodivers Conserv 37(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight JG, Bain MB (1996) Sampling fish assemblages in forested floodplain wetlands. Ecol Freshw Fish 5(2):76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (2017) Preliminary assessment and attempt to maintain minimum ecological flows in upper and middle Ganga River. In: Sharma N (ed) River system analysis and management. Springer, Singapore, pp 321–337

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lakra WS (2010) Fish biodiversity of Uttar Pradesh: issues of livelihood security, threats and conservation. In: National conference on biodiversity, development and poverty alleviation (May 22, 2010). Uttar Pradesh State Biodiversity Board, Lucknow, pp 40–45

  • Leopold LB, Langbein WB (1966) River meanders. Sci Am 214:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumb A, Sharma TC, Bibeault JF (2011) A review of genesis and evolution of water quality index (WQI) and some future directions. Water Qual Expo Health 3(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Kim H, Kjeldsen TR, Packman J, Grebby S, Dearden R (2014) Assessing the impact of urbanisation on storm runoff in a peri-urban catchment using historical change in impervious cover. J Hydrol 515:9–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol Econ 35:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muotka T, Paavola R, Haapala A, Novikmec M, Laasonen P (2002) Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biol Conserv 105(2):243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawab A (2007) Ecology of otters in Corbett Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand, India. PhD Thesis, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India

  • Neave M, Rayburg S (2016) Designing urban rivers to maximise their geomorphic and ecologic diversity. Int J GEOMATE 11(25):2468–2473

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson M (2010) Understanding ‘hot-spot’ problems in catchments: the need for scale-sensitive measures and mechanisms to secure effective solutions for river management and conservation. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 20(S1):62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi GJ, DeVore P, Detenbeck N, Taylor D, Lima A, Pastor J, Yount JD, Naiman RJ (1990) Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ Manag 14(5):571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Galat DL (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42(2):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E (2010) River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw Biol 55(1):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Filoso S, Fanelli RM (2014) From ecosystems to ecosystem services: stream restoration as ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 65:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Zedler JB, Falk DA (2016) Ecological theory and restoration ecology. In: Foundations of restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–26

  • Pedersen ML (2009) Effects of channelisation, riparian structure and catchment area on physical habitats in small lowland Streams. Fundam Appl Limnol Archiv für Hydrobiologie 174(1):89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peipoch M, Brauns M, Hauer FR, Weitere M, Valett HM (2015) Ecological simplification: human influences on riverscape complexity. Bioscience 65(11):1057–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip B, Paul R (2012) River conservation and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Ward JV (1989) Implications of stream flow variability and predictability for lotic community structure—a regional analysis of stream flow patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1805–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole GC (2002) Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river continuum. Freshw Biol 47:641–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai RK, Upadhyay A, Sarkar S, Upadhyay AM, Singh VP (2010) GIUH based transfer function for Gomti River Basin of India. J Spatial Hydrol 9(2):24–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven PJ, Holmes NT, Vaughan IP, Dawson FH, Scarlett P (2010) Benchmarking habitat quality: observations using River Habitat Survey on near-natural streams and rivers in northern and western Europe. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 20(S1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revenga C, Brunner J, Henninger N, Kassem K, Payne R (2000) Freshwater systems. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini A, Dua A, Mohindra V (2010) Genetic variability analysis of Giant river cattish (Sperata seenghala) populations from Indus river system by RAPD-PCR. Russ J Genet 46:982–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Dubey VK, Singh AK, Gupta BK, Pandey A, Sani RK, Lakra WS (2012) The recent occurrence of exotic freshwater fishes in the tributaries of river Ganga basin: abundance, distribution, risk, and conservation issues. Environmentalist 32(4):476–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Khan GE, Dabas A, Pathak AK, Mir JI, Rebello SC, Pal A, Singh SP (2013) Length weight relationship and condition factor of selected freshwater fish species found in River Ganga, Gomti and Rapti, India. J Environ Biol 34:951–956

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sloto RA, Crouse MY (1996) HYSEP, a computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis, U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report No. 96-4040, p 46

  • Tandon SK, Sinha R (2018) The Ganga River: a summary view of a large river system of the Indian Sub-Continent. In: Singh DS (ed) The Indian rivers: scientific and socio-economic aspects. Springer, Singapore, pp 61–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tarplee WH, Louder DE, Weber AJ (1971) Evaluation of the effects of channelization on fish populations in North Carolina’s coastal plain streams. N. C. Wildlife Resource Commission, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Trexler JC (1995) Restoration of the Kissimmee River: a conceptual model of past and present fish communities and its consequences for evaluating restoration success. Restor Ecol 3(3):195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ (2010) Linking ecological and hydromorphological data: approaches, challenges and future prospects for riverine science. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 20(S1):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan IP, Diamond M, Gurnell AM, Hall KA, Jenkins A, Milner NJ, Naylor LA, Sear DA, Woodward G, Ormerod SJ (2009) Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 19(1):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, D’antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2018) Toward sustainable rivers and water resources. In: Sustaining river ecosystems and water resources. Springer, Cham, pp 105–141

  • Wohl E, Lane SN, Wilcox AC (2015) The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resour Res 51(8):5974–5997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer DW (1976) The effects of long-reach channelization on habitat and invertebrate drift in some Iowa streams. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5722

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Policy Research Cell, Department of Science and Technology, India (Grant no. DST/PRC/CPR-04/2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Venkatesh Dutta, Urvashi Sharma & Kashifa Iqbal

  2. DST Centre for Policy Research, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, India

    Adeeba

  3. WWF-India, New Delhi, India

    Ravindra Kumar

  4. ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources (ICAR-NBFGR), Lucknow, India

    Ajey Kumar Pathak

Authors
  1. Venkatesh Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Urvashi Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kashifa Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adeeba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ravindra Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ajey Kumar Pathak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatesh Dutta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, V., Sharma, U., Iqbal, K. et al. Impact of river channelization and riverfront development on fluvial habitat: evidence from Gomti River, a tributary of Ganges, India. Environmental Sustainability 1, 167–184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-0016-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-0016-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation