Abstract
This paper examines the effects of dynamic agglomeration economies on the productivity growth of the industries in Indonesia’s regions. The study introduces employment market potential into the city-industry growth estimation for controlling local size and preventing overestimation of the agglomeration effects. The results suggest that both specialization and diversity are important for city-industry growth and that some externalities are stronger in different time periods. The effects of specialization and diversity on medium-term growth (2000–2010) are stronger than on long-term growth (1990–2010), in addition to new positive effects of competition. A detailed analysis across industries reveals a strong relationship between local industrial structure and performance—productivity and employment growth—which is associated with industry maturity within its lifecycle stages.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
14 March 2018
Unfortunately, the following reference was not included in the original publication of the article.
Notes
City size is classified into three categories: “small–medium” (population under 500,000), “large” (population between 500,000 and 1,000,000), and “metro-megapolitan” (population over 1,000,000).
For instance, Rosenthal and Strange (2004) found that the impact of city size on productivity is between 3 and 8%.
Stata command “levpet” created by Petrin et al. (2004) was used to estimate the plant-level production function.
References
Abdel-Rahman HM, Anas A (2004) Theories of systems of cities. Handb Reg Urban Econ 4:2293–2339
Almeida R (2007) Local economic structure and growth. Spat Econ Anal 2(1):65–90
Almeida R, Fernandes AM (2013) Explaining local manufacturing growth in Chile: the advantages of sectoral diversity. Appl Econ 45(16):2201–2213
Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2007) Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing. Stata J 7:465–506
Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A (2009) Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Res Policy 38(2):318–337
Cingano F, Schivardi F (2004) Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(4):720–744
Combes P-P (2000) Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984–1993. J Urban Econ 47:329–355
Combes P-P, Magnac T, Robin J-M (2004) The dynamics of local employment in France. J Urban Econ 56:217–243
Combes P-P, Duranton G, Gobillon L, Roux S (2010) Estimating agglomeration economies with history, geology, and worker effects. Agglomeration economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 15–66
De Groot HLF, Poot J, Smith MJ (2009) Agglomeration externalities, innovation and regional growth: theoretical perspectives and meta-analysis. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edwar Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 256–281
Dekle R (2002) Industrial concentration and regional growth: evidence from the prefectures. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):310–315
Duranton G, Puga D (2000) Diversity and specialisation in cities: why, where and when does it matter? Urban Stud 37(3):533–555
Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1454–1477
Duranton G, Puga D (2014) The growth of cities. In: Handbook of economic growth, vol 2, pp 781–853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00005-7
Gill IS, Goh C-C (2010) Scale economies and cities. World Bank Res Obs 25:235–262
Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152
Henderson J Vernon, Kuncoro A, Turner M (1995) Industrial development in cities. J Polit Econ 103(5):1067–1090
Henderson JV, Lee T, Lee YJ (2001) Scale externalities in Korea. J Urban Econ 49(3):479–504
Holl A (2012) Market potential and firm-level productivity in Spain. J Econ Geogr 12:1191–1215
Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70:317–341
Lucio D, Juan J, Herce JA, Goicolea A (2002) The effects of externalities on productivity growth in spanish industry. Reg Sci Urban Econ 32(2):241–258
Marrocu E, Paci R, Usai S (2013) Productivity growth in the old and new Europe: the role of agglomeration externalities. J Reg Sci 53:418–442
Melo PC, Graham DJ, Noland RB (2009) A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(3):332–342
Petrin A, Poi BP, Levinsohn J (2004) Production function estimation in stata using inputs to control for unobservables. Stata J 4:113–123
Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. MacMillan, London
Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev Econ Stat 85(2):377–393
Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2119–2171
Sjöholm F (1999) Productivity growth in indonesia: the role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment. Econ Dev Cult Change 47(3):559–584
Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: Andrews DWK, Stock JH (eds) Identification and inference in econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 80–190
Widodo W, Salim R, Bloch H (2014) Agglomeration economies and productivity growth in manufacturing industry: empirical evidence from indonesia. Econ Record 90(s1):41–58
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank to Muhammad Irfan Shaleh for sharing the GIS Euclidean-Distance and geological data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Khoirunurrofik Local economic structure, productivity growth, and industry life cycle: evidence from Indonesia. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 2, 453–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-018-0072-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-018-0072-6