Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Supporting the Professional Identity of Medical Science Educators: Understanding Faculty Motivations for Quality Improvement in Teaching

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching and learning in the health sciences has experienced significant change in the last decade. Integrated curriculums, new instructional design approaches, educational technology, mobile, and self-directed learning are a few among many shifts that have left academicians unsure about their identity and effectiveness. Time is an increasingly precious commodity for maintaining, unlearning, and relearning the skills necessary to be effective in the current health sciences environment. Likewise, this modern age has new economic realities that also impact the investments that can be made in continually developing the essential asset of educator. This qualitative study examines the motivation of faculty of an interprofessional cohort focused on performance improvement in teaching. The study aims to inform administrators, educational leaders, faculty developers, and educators of the contributing factors that help support the efficacy and professional identity of teachers in higher education and whether internal motivation alone is sufficient for success. The study provides evidence of internal motivation as the pivotal determining factor for faculty decisions to pursue quality and performance improvement in teaching with student engagement, using technology in teaching, and presentation/facilitation skills primary drivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright GB. Student-centered learning in higher education. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2011;23:92–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Irby DM. Excellence in clinical teaching: knowledge transformation and development required. Med Educ. 2014;48:776–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Lankveld T, Schoonenboom J, Kusurkar R, Volman M, Beishuizen J, Croiset G. Integrating the teaching role into one’s identity: a qualitative study of beginning undergraduate medical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:601–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore K, Horstmanshof L. Twelve tips for educating tomorrow’s clinical educators today: a proactive approach to clinical education (PACE). Focus on Health Professional Education: a multi-disciplinary Journal. 2016;17:58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Demaria AN. Here come the millennials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1654–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foster K, Laurent R. How we make good doctors into good teachers: a short course to support busy clinicians to improve their teaching skills. Med Teach. 2013;35:4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldie J. The formation of professional identity in medical students: considerations for educators. Med Teach. 2012;34:e641–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haramati A. Educating the educators: a key to curricular integration. Acad Med. 2015;90:133–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anonymous. Professional identity formation in medical education: the convergence of multiple domains. Proceedings of the HEC Forum, Springer, 2012.

  10. Meyer EM, Zapatka S, Brienza RS. The development of professional identity and the formation of teams in the veterans affairs Connecticut healthcare system’s center of excellence in primary care education program (CoEPCE). Acad Med. 2015;90:802–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monrouxe LV. Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care? Med Educ. 2010;44:40–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Sullivan PS, Mkony C, Beard J, Irby DM. Identity formation and motivation of new faculty developers: a replication study in a resource constrained university. Med Teach. 2016;38:879–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Functions L. Structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Liaison Committee on Medical Education 2014; 28.

  14. Higher Learning Commission. Accessed January 3, 2018 https://www.hlcommission.org/Policies/criteria-and-core-components.html.

  15. Association of American Medical Colleges. Academic medicine in 2025: notable trends and five future forces. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blumberg P. Developing learner-centered teaching: a practical guide for faculty. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brown M. Six trajectories for digital technology in higher education. Educ Rev. 2015;50(4):16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Blaschke LM, Hase S. Heutagogy, technology, and lifelong learning for professional and part-time learners. In: Transformative Perspectives and Processes in Higher Education. Springer, 2015: 75–94.

  19. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89:236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheslock JJ, Ortagus JC, Umbricht MR, Wymore J. The cost of producing higher education: an exploration of theory, evidence, and institutional policy. In: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Springer, 2016: 349–392.

  22. Fink LD. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Rev. and updated edition ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2013.

  23. Srinivasan M, Li ST, Meyers FJ, et al. “Teaching as a competency”: competencies for medical educators. Acad Med. 2011;86:1211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherbino J, Frank JR, Snell L. Defining the key roles and competencies of the clinician-educator of the 21st century: a national mixed-methods study. Acad Med. 2014;89:783–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tucker CR. If medical education was a discipline, she would have five core competencies. Med Teach 2017; 1–5.

  26. Kezar AJ. How colleges change: understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York: Routledge; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mehta NB, Hull AL, Young JB, Stoller JK. Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88:1418–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen B, Hunter J, Sonnemann J, Cooper S. Making time for great teaching. Carlton: Grattan Institute; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Irby DM. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69:333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirkland K, Sutch D. Overcoming the Barriers to Educational Innovation: A Literature Review. Futurelab, 2009.

  31. Underwood J. An effective education change agent? In: Karagiannidis C, Politis P, Karasavvidis I, editors. Research on e-learning and ICT in education: technological, pedagogical and instructional perspectives. New York: Springer Verlag; 2014. p. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Leverence R, Nuttall R, Palmer R, Segal M, Wood A, Yancey F, et al. Using organizational philosophy to create a self-sustaining compensation plan without harming academic missions. Acad Med. 2017;92:1133–7.

  33. Madden M, Lenhart A, Cortesi S, Gasser U. Pew internet and american life project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leslie K, Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Esdaile M, Reeves S. Advancing faculty development in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88:1038–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The Next Accreditation System: Faculty Development Needs in Competency-based Medical Education. Proceedings of the SGIM FORUM, 2014.

  36. Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: a 10-year update: BEME guide no. 40. Med Teach. 2016;38:769–86.

  37. Wong BM, Goldman J, Goguen JM, Base C, Rotteau L, van Melle E, et al. Faculty-resident “co-learning”: a longitudinal exploration of an innovative model for faculty development in quality improvement. Acad Med. 2017;92:1151–9.

  38. Nilson LB. Teaching at its best: a research-based resource for college instructors. Fourth edition ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley imprint, 2016.

  39. Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, and Fink LD. Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. 1st pbk. ed. Sterling: Stylus Pub., 2004.

  40. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: a six step approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weimer M. Learner-centered teaching: five key changes to practice. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Barkley EF. Student engagement techniques: a handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kolb AY, Kolb DA, Passarelli A, Sharma G. On becoming an experiential educator: the educator role profile. Simul Gaming. 2014;45:204–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: FT Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vygotsky LS. Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gardner H. Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. 20th anniversary ed. ed. New York: Basic Books; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Eighth ed. New York: Routledge; 2015.

  48. Taylor DC, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE guide no. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1561–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jarvis P. Adult education and lifelong learning: theory and practice. New York: Routledge; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Ambrose SA, Bridges MW, Lovett MC, DiPietro M, Norman MK. How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. 2010.

  51. Bolman LG, Gallos JV. Reframing academic leadership. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. Dent J, Harden RM, Hunt D. A practical guide for medical teachers. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Dirksen J. Design for how people learn. New Riders: Second edition ed. Berkeley; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential skills for a medical teacher: an introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. Second ed. New York: Elsevier; 2017.

  56. Hodell C. ISD from the ground up: a no-nonsense approach to instructional design. 4th edition ed. Alexandria: ATD Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Petre M, Weaver D, Schwartz M, et al. Use of a medical librarian to facilitate evidence-based medicine faculty development. 2015.

  58. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. 1st ed. Eugene, Or; Alexandria: International Society for Technology in Education; ASCD, 2012.

  59. Mayer RE, Estrella G. Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learn Instr. 2014;33:12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Medicine as a community of practice: Implications for medical education. Acad Med. 2017;

  61. Berkhout JJ, Helmich E, Teunissen PW, Vleuten CP, Jaarsma ADC. Context matters when striving to promote active and lifelong learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;52:34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Willett LR. Comparing active and passive learning: what does the evidence really say? Acad Med. 2017;92:573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Walling A, Istas K, Bonaminio GA, Paolo AM, Fontes JD, Davis N, et al. Medical student perspectives of active learning: a focus group study. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29:173–80.

  64. Dolmans D, Michaelsen L, van Merrienboer J, van der Vleuten C. Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds! Med Teach. 2015;37:354–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Carpenter R, O'Brien SP. Designing a SoTL professional learning community (PLC) experience for faculty development. Stillwater: New Forums Press; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Epstein RM. Reflection, perception and the acquisition of wisdom. Med Educ. 2008;42:1048–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wald HS. Professional identity (trans)formation in medical education: reflection, relationship, resilience. Acad Med. 2015;90:701–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 3. ed., repr ed. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler, 2012.

  69. Chou CL, Hirschmann K, Fortin AH, Lichstein PR. The impact of a faculty learning community on professional and personal development: the facilitator training program of the american academy on communication in healthcare. Acad Med. 2014;89:1051–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. American Medical Association. Creating the medical school of the future. https://www.ama-assn.org/education/creating-medical-school-future. Accessed Dec 1, 2017.

  71. Asch DA, Weinstein DF. Innovation in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:794–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Steinert Y, Naismith L, Mann K. Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 19. Med Teach. 2012;34:483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wilkerson L, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998;73:387–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Stake RE. Qualitative research: studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schumacher DJ, Englander R, Carraccio C. Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment. Acad Med. 2013;88:1635–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Darling-Hammond L, McLaughlin MW. Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan. 2011;92:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Campion MW, Bhasin RM, Beaudette DJ, Shann MH, Benjamin EJ. Mid-career faculty development in academic medicine: how does it impact faculty and institutional vitality? J Fac Dev. 2016;30:49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hartman FZ, Bann C, Barton B, Pearce K. Making a difference: faculty development in competency based education. Higher Learning Commission 2016.

  82. Stagnaro-Green A, Roe D, Soto-Greene M, Joffe R. Development of a mission-based funding model for undergraduate medical education: incorporation of quality. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Summer R, Wiener RS, Carroll D, Sager A. Physician perception of the impact of productivity measures on academic practice. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:967–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ma OJ, Hedges JR, Newgard CD. The academic RVU: ten years developing a metric for and financially incenting academic productivity at Oregon health & science university. Acad Med. 2017;92:1138–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Regan L, Jung J, Kelen GD. Educational value units: a mission-based approach to assigning and monitoring faculty teaching activities in an academic medical department. Acad Med. 2016;91:1642–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Amending miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2016;91:180–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90:718–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89:1446–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Jippes E, Steinert Y, Pols J, Achterkamp MC, van Engelen JM, Brand PL. How do social networks and faculty development courses affect clinical supervisors’ adoption of a medical education innovation? An exploratory study. Acad Med. 2013;88:398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Facilitating and hindering motivation, learning, and well-being in schools: research and observations from self-determination theory. Handbook of motivation at school 2016;96.

  92. Wlodkowski RJ, Ginsberg MB. Enhancing adult motivation to learn: a comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mann KV. Motivation in medical education: how theory can inform our practice. Acad Med. 1999;74:237–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Reeve J. Understanding motivation and emotion. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Pelaccia T, Viau R. Motivation in medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(2):136–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Budden CR, Svechnikova K, White J. Why do surgeons teach? A qualitative analysis of motivation in excellent surgical educators. Med Teach. 2017;39(2):188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Gilboy MB, Heinerichs S, Pazzaglia G. Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(1):109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Parrish A, Sadera W. Not Another Workshop: Designing Quality Faculty Development that Supports Technology Use in Teacher Education. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2016; 3011–3014.

  100. De Grez L, Valcke M, Roozen I. The differential impact of observational learning and practice-based learning on the development of oral presentation skills in higher education. High Educ Res Dev. 2014;33(2):256–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Feraco AM, Brand SR, Mack JW, Kesselheim JC, Block SD, Wolfe J. Communication skills training in pediatric oncology: moving beyond role modeling. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(6):966–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Pelletier S, Kumar NL, Shields HM. Tu1116 one-on-one individualized coaching of faculty improves self-reported teaching and presentation skills among presenters. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(4):S847–8.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Weppner WG, Fisher AK, Hagman M, Inouye L, King I, Smith CS, et al. Taking SGIM’s teaching educators across the continuum of health care on the road—a local, Interprofessional faculty development innovation. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):378–9. Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

  104. Senge PM. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Rev. and updated. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 2006.

  105. Carroll C, O’Loughlin D. Peer observation of teaching: enhancing academic engagement for new participants. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2014;51:446–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Stroebe W. Why good teaching evaluations may reward bad teaching: on grade inflation and other unintended consequences of student evaluations. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016;11:800–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Boring A, Ottoboni K, Stark PB. Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen Research. 2016; 10.

  108. Templeton K. Impact of gender on teaching evaluations of faculty: another example of unconscious bias?. 2016. J Women’s Health. 2016;25(5):420–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Berk RA. Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2005;17:48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Beckman H. The role of medical culture in the journey to resilience. Acad Med. 2015;90:710–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Shanafelt TD, Mungo M, Schmitgen J, Storz KA, Reeves D, Hayes SN, et al. Longitudinal study evaluating the association between physician burnout and changes in professional work effort. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:422–31.

  112. Rockich-Winston N, Train BC, Rudolph MJ, Gillette C. Faculty motivations to use active learning among pharmacy educators. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2017.

  113. Office of Faculty Development. Performance Improvement on Teaching Series (PITs). In: Professional Development Programs. The University of Nebraska Medical Center. 2018. https://www.unmc.edu/facdev/programs/professional/pits/index.html Accessed 27 May 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985511 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-5511, USA

    Linda M. Love, Faye L. Haggar, Sarah B. McBrien, Teresa L. Hartman, Ron J. Shope & Gary L. Beck Dallaghan

  2. Children’s Hospital & Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA

    Russell J. Buzalko

Authors
  1. Linda M. Love
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faye L. Haggar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah B. McBrien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Russell J. Buzalko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Teresa L. Hartman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ron J. Shope
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Love.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Love, L.M., Haggar, F.L., McBrien, S.B. et al. Supporting the Professional Identity of Medical Science Educators: Understanding Faculty Motivations for Quality Improvement in Teaching. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 655–665 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0609-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0609-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation