Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

OBM is Already Using the “Fuzzy Concept” Criteria for Applied Behavioral Research: Commentary on Critchfield and Reed

  • Commentary
  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J., & Snyder, G. (2008). Removing obstacles to safety: A behavior-based approach. Atlanta: Performance Management Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brethower, D. M. (1972). Behavioral analysis in business and industry. Kalamazoo: Behaviordelia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brethower, D. M. (1982). The total performance system. In R. O’Brien, A. Dickinson, & M. Rosow (Eds.), Industrial behavior modification (pp. 350–269). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchfield, T.S., & Reed D.D. (2017). The fuzzy concept of applied behavior analysis research. The Behavior Analyst, 40.

  • Daniels, A. C. (1977). Editorial. J Organ Behav Manag, 1, v–vii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. (1978/1996). Human competence: engineering worthy performance. Washington, D.C.: International Society for Performance Improvement.

  • Hantula, D. A., & Wells, V. K. (2010). Outside the organization: The analysis of consumer behavior. J Organ Behav Manag, 30(2), 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houmanfar, R. (2015). Research and practice: A formula for success. J Organ Behav Manag, 35(3–4), 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyten, C. (2009). Strengthening the focus on business results: The need for systems approaches in organizational behavior management. J Organ Behav Manag, 29, 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change: Engineering organizations with behavioral systems analysis. Reno: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSween, T. (2003). The values-based safety process: Improving your safety culture with behavior-based safety. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organizational chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine, B., Reis, M., & Hantula, D. A. (2014). An evaluation of stimulus preference assessment methodology in organizational behavior management. J Organ Behav Manag, 34(1), 7–15. doi:10.1080/01608061.2013.873379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aubrey Daniels International, Inc., Atlanta, USA

    Cloyd Hyten

Authors
  1. Cloyd Hyten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cloyd Hyten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyten, C. OBM is Already Using the “Fuzzy Concept” Criteria for Applied Behavioral Research: Commentary on Critchfield and Reed. BEHAV ANALYST 40, 179–182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0096-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0096-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation