Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance Among HIV-Positive Patients in India

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Standard health insurance products in India currently exclude conditions related to HIV. Although antiretroviral (ARV) drugs are now publicly funded, the burden of treatment due to hospitalization on people living with HIV and AIDS (PLHIV) continues to be high. Unlike many countries, India is yet to eliminate the exclusion clause in standard health insurance products.

Objective

The overall aim of this study was to understand if PLHIV would be willing to participate in and purchase commercial health insurance, if it were offered to them.

Methods

This study uses primary survey data to analyse the burden of treatment due to hospitalization and estimates the willingness to pay (WTP) for health insurance based on the contingent valuation approach.

Results

The average WTP per year was in the range of Indian rupee (R) 1,145–1,355 or $US20–24, with hospitalization and economic status significantly affecting the WTP.

Conclusion

The findings of the study can serve as evidence for possible changes to policy on health insurance that would allow PLHIV to purchase health insurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The permanent exclusion clause is for certain conditions that are excluded ‘forever’ from the list of benefits, irrespective of the time of its occurrence. These conditions largely represent either non-accidental losses (i.e. the occurrence of an event could be within the control of the claimant) or poorly defined losses (i.e. time, place and cause of a loss may not be clear).

  2. The term ‘diagnosed conditions’ was defined as diagnosis for hospitalization in the survey. Therefore, the reported response generally indicates the respondents’ perspective of the illness and may not align with exact clinical diagnosis. However, we attempted to classify these responses into medical categories using the ‘lay reporting of health information’ framework.

References

  1. National AIDS Control Programme (NACO). Response to the HIV epidemic in India. New Delhi: National AIDS Control Organisation, Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2011.

  2. National AIDS Control Programme (NACO). Annual report 2012–13. New Delhi: Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2013.

  3. Gupta I, et al. Implications and feasibility of commercial health insurance for people living with HIV in India, in three decades of HIV/AIDS in Asia. New Delhi: SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd; 2012.

  4. Shahrawat R, Rao KD. Insured yet vulnerable: out-of-pocket payments and India’s poor. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(3):213–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reddy KS, et al. Towards achievement of universal health care in India by 2020: a call to action. Lancet. 2011;377(9767):760–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar AK, et al. Financing health care for all: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2011;377(9766):668–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forgia GL, Nagpal S. Government-sponsored health insurance in India: are you covered? World Bank Publications; 2012.

  8. Subbiah R, Peter B. Towards mainstreaming HIV and AIDS: role of insurance sector in India. Bangalore: Population Services International, Connect; 2011.

  9. Gupta I, Roy A, Trivedi M. Access to antiretroviral treatment: what role can health insurance play in India?. New Delhi: Population Council; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta I, et al. Covering treatment for HIV and AIDS in India: a feasibility study. New Delhi: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) India; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kapoor A, et al. Advocating mainstreaming HIV in insurance in India: experience of project Connect. In: 10th international congress on AIDS in Asia and the Pacific (ICAAP), Busan; 2011.

  12. Duraisamy P, et al. Costs and financial burden of care and support services to PLHA and households in South India. AIDS Care. 2006;18(2):121–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumarasamy N, et al. Financial burden of health services for people with HIV/AIDS in India. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(6):509–17.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta I. Willingness to pay for antiretroviral therapy for HIV positive individuals in India. Forum Health Econ Policy. 2007;10(2):1558-9544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ. 1998;7(4):313–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Drummond MF, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krupnick A, Alberini A, Cropper M, et al. Age, health, and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 2000.

  18. Stewart JM, et al. Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care? J Health Econ. 2002;21(4):585–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bärnighausen T, et al. Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. BMC Health Services Res. 2007;7(1):114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krupnick A, et al. Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. J Risk Uncertainty. 2002;24(2):161–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Palwal A. Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. In: Towards mainstreaming HIV in insurance: the road map and role of key stakeholders. New Delhi; 2011.

  22. NACO. Reducing vulnerabilities: key social protection schemes from a PLHIV. New Delhi: United Nations Development Programme, National AIDS Control Organisation, Vrutti; 2011.

  23. Jain N. Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY)—journey so far … . In: 5th national workshop of Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY). Thiruvananthapuram; 2013.

  24. Pande S. Financing healthcare costs for treatment of HIV, AIDS and opportunistic infections in India. The need for developing insurance instruments, in business markets. Noida: Birla Institute of Management Technology; 2012. p. 50–59.

  25. Nadkarni V, Goel S, Pongurlekar S. HIV sensitive social protection: a four state utilization study. New Delhi: TISS-UNDP Collaboration; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was made possible through a grant of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) under the cooperative agreement 386-A-00-06-00145. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the entire team of the Population Services International-Connect programme and also Shalini Rudra for their input and help during the survey.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Professor Indrani Gupta takes overall responsibility for the entire research. She contributed to obtaining funding for research, conception and design of the research, analysis and interpretation, writing, as well as critical revision and final approval of the article.

Professor Mayur Trivedi contributed to conception and design of the research, analysis and interpretation, and writing and revision of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayur Trivedi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 53 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 53 kb)

Appendix : Equation for Regression

Appendix : Equation for Regression

Log (max WTP) = f(age, age squared, whether female, whether currently working, education up to primary, education up to secondary, whether currently married, duration on ART, number of household members HIV positive, economic status [in first quartile], economic status [in second quartile], economic status [in third quartile], whether hospitalized last year).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, I., Trivedi, M. Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance Among HIV-Positive Patients in India. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 12, 601–610 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-014-0105-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-014-0105-x

Keywords

Navigation