Abstract
A changing climate will challenge the effectiveness and functioning of existing international resource management structures or international regimes. This is already evident in regimes that manage transboundary fish stocks, where rapid changes in the abundance and distribution of fishery resources threaten international cooperation. This article examines the breakdown in resource cooperation for the northeast Atlantic mackerel fishery where, for over a decade, Coastal States have failed to reach an agreement on the management of the stock after a climate-induced shift in the stock’s distribution. Why did the management regime fail? And what are lessons learnt for such regimes more generally? This article sheds light on the interplay between a relatively weak international regime, domestic interests related to the importance of the national fishing industry and a breakdown in the common principles – fisheries science – that international cooperation is based on. The limited flexibility in the negotiating position of the various states – and thus, the regime at large – can be ascribed to a combination of strong domestic industry influence on negotiating positions, and a disagreement over the appropriate methods to measure stock biomass in tandem with unclear allocation principles. Strengthening existing mechanisms to cooperatively manage shared stocks between Coastal States will be important to avoid such disputes in the future. However, states are weary of relinquishing decision-making powers. Therefore, starting with an agreement on the fundamentals, namely the science that underpins diverging claims, could be a first step towards a long-term solution for the northeast Atlantic mackerel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Some even noted that the mackerel dispute was the primary reason for Iceland’s decision to end its EU membership bid on March 12, 2015 (Griswold 2015).
Agreed record on a fisheries arrangement between the European Union, the Faroe Islands and Norway on the management of mackerel in the North-East Atlantic for 2014 to 2018.
References
Allison, Edward H., Allison L. Perry, Marie Caroline Badjeck, W. Neil Adger, Katrina Brown, Declan Conway, and Ashley S. Halls, et al. 2009. Vulnerability of National Economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish Fish 10 (2): 173–196.
Árnason, Ragnar, and Sveinn Agnarsson. 2003. ‘The role of the fishing industry in the Icelandic economy: a historical examination’. Working Paper Series 03:08. https://rafhladan.is/handle/10802/7609.
Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug. 2007. Oceans of trouble: domestic influence on international fisheries cooperation in the North Atlantic and the Barents Sea. Global Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.1.120.
Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug. 2008. Who gets what? Domestic influences on international negotiations allocating shared resources. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Barnett, Michael. 1990. High politics is low politics: the domestic and systemic sources of Israeli security policy, 1967–1977. World Polit 42 (04): 529–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010513.
Bernauer, Thomas, Anna Kalbhenn, Vally Koubi, and Gabriele Spilker. 2010. A comparison of international and domestic sources of global governance dynamics. Br J Polit Sci 40 (3): 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123410000098.
Bjørndal, Trond, and Nils-Arne Ekerhovd. 2013. ‘Management of Pelagic Fisheries in the North East Atlantic: Norwegian spring spawning herring, Mackerel and Blue Whiting’ SNF 5. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/166822.
Bomsdorf, Clemens. 2014. ‘Iceland to set own mackerel-fishing quota’. Wall Street J, 13 March 2014. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303546204579437291728713068.
Brander, Keith. 2010. Impacts of climate change on fisheries. J Mar Syst 79 (3–4): 389–402.
Breitmeier, Helmut, Arild Underdal, and Oran R. Young. 2011. The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. Int Stud Rev 13 (4): 579–605.
Cendrowicz, Leo. 2010. ‘The mackerel wars: Europe’s fish Tiff with Iceland’. Time, 27 August 2010. http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2014161,00.html.
Cheung, William W. L., Miranda C. Jones, Vicky W. Y. Lam, Dana D. Miller, Yoshitaka Ota, Louise Teh, and Ussif R. Sumaila. 2016. ‘Transform high seas management to build climate resilience in marine seafood supply’. Fish Fish, 1–10.
Christiansen, Jørgen S., Catherine W. Mecklenburg, and Oleg V. Karamushko. 2014. Arctic marine fishes and their fisheries in light of global change. Glob Chang Biol 20 (2): 352–359.
Crowe, Beryl L. 1969. The tragedy of the commons Revisted. Science 166 (3909): 1103–1107.
DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2000. Domestic sources of international environmental policy: industry, environmentalists, and U.S. power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stefano, De, James Duncan Lucia, Shlomi Dinar, Kerstin Stahl, Kenneth M. Strzepek, and Aaron T. Wolf. 2012. Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. J Peace Res 49 (1): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311427416.
European Commission. 2016. ‘Commission negotiates mackerel quota increases in North-East Atlantic for 2017’. Press Releases 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/commission-negotiates-mackerel-quota-increases-north-east-atlantic-2017_en.
FAO. 2016. ‘The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture: contributing to food security and nutrition for all’. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf.
Findlay, Keith. 2014. ‘Mackerel stock is at its healthiest level in years’. The Press and Journal, 11 June 2014. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/business/scotland-business/252104/mackerel-stock-is-at-its-healthiest-level-in-years/.
Fontaine, Paul. 2015. ‘Iceland struggles to settle the fishing quota dispute’. The Reykjavik Grapevine, 2015. http://grapevine.is/mag/articles/2015/06/22/iceland-struggles-to-settle-the-fishing-quota-dispute/.
Gänsbauer, Anja, Ulrike Bechtold, and Harald Wilfing. 2016. SoFISHticated policy - social perspectives on the fish conflict in the Northeast Atlantic. Mar Policy 66: 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.014.
Griswold, Alison. 2015. ‘Holy mackerel! Iceland Has a Fishy Reason for Abandoning Its EU Bid’ Slate, 2015. http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2015/03/13/iceland_abandons_eu_bid_it_s_all_about_the_mackerel.html.
Hallwood, P. 2016. International public law and the failure to efficiently manage ocean living resources. Marine Resource Econmics 31 (2): 131–139.
Hannesson, Rögnvaldur. 2013. Sharing a migrating fish stock. Mar Resour Econ 28 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-28.1.1.
Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger. 2000. Integrating theories of international regimes. Rev Int Polit Econ 26 (1): 3–33.
Hegland, Troels J., and Christopher C.E. Hopkins. 2014. Towards a new fisheries effort management system for the Faroe Islands? - controversies around the meaning of fishing sustainability. Maritime Studies 13 (12): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-014-0012-7.
Hønneland, Geir. 2012. Making fishery agreements work: Post-agreement bargaining in the Barents Sea. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
van Hoof, L., and J. van Tatenhove. 2009. EU marine policy on the move: The tension between fisheries and maritime policy. Mar Policy 33 (4): 726–732.
Hotvedt, Bjørnar Dahl. 2010. The problem of sharing a common stock: an analysis of the mackerel conflict in the North East Atlantic. Thesis: Norwegian College of Fisheries Science. University of Tromsø.
Hovgaard, Gestur, and Maria Ackrén. 2017. Autonomy in Denmark: Greenland and the Faroes Islands. In Secession and counter-secession. An international relations perspective, ed. D. Muro and E. Woertz, 69–76. Barcelona: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs.
Icelandic Ministry of Industries and Innovation. 2012. ‘Iceland’s commitment to sustainable mackerel fishing’. Mackerel Fishing News 2012. http://eng.atvinnuvegaraduneyti.is/subjects/mackerel-fishing-dispute/news/nr/6902.
ICES. 2017. ‘ICES advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort -Northeast Atlantic’. http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication reports/advice/2016/2016/mac-nea.Pdf.
ICES. 2018. ‘Mackerel (Scomber Scombrus) in subareas 1–8 and 14, and in division 9.A (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)’. http://ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication reports/advice/2018/2018/mac.27.Nea.Pdf.
Islandsbanki. 2016. ‘Annual report 2016’. Reykjavik. https://www.islandsbanki.is/library/Skrar/IR/Afkoma/AR16_ISB_final.pdf.
Iversen, Audun, Marianne Svorken, and Bjørn Inge Bendiksen. 2014. ‘Makrellkonfliktens Konsekvenser (the consequences of the mackerel conflict)’. Tromsø. https://nofima.no/pub/1157010/.
Jansen, Teunis, and Henrik Gislason. 2013. Population structure of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber Scombrus). PLoS One 8 (5): e64744.
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1996. Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. In Institutions for environmental aid: Pitfalls and promise, ed. R.O. Keohane and M.A. Levy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and David G. Victor. 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7–23.
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kristiansen, Magnus Skjelmo. 2013. ‘Forvaltning Av Felles Ressurser: En Casestudie Av Regimeeffektivitet i Den Nordvest-Atlantiske Fiskeriorganisasjonen (NAFO) Og Den Nordøst-Atlantiske Fiskerikommisjonen (NEAFC) (Management of Joint Resources)’. Thesis: Sociology and Political Science. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Levy, Marc A., Robert O. Keohane, and Peter M. Haas. 1993. Improving the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. In Institutions for the earth: sources of effective international environmental protection, ed. Peter M. Haas, Robert O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, 397–426. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Levy, Marc A., Oran R. Young, and Michael Zürn. 1995. The study of international regimes. European Journal of International Relations 1 (3): 267–330.
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Interests, power, and multilateralism. Int Organ 46 (4): 765–792.
Milner, Helen V. 1998. Rationalizing politics: the emerging synthesis of international, American, and comparative politics. Int Organ 52 (4): 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550743.
Molenaar, Erik J. 2004. ‘Regional Fisheries Management Organizations: Issues of Participation, Allocation and Unregulated Fishing’. In Oceans Management in the 21st Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses, edited by Alex G. Oude Elferink and Donald R. Rothwell. Leiden, NLD: Martinus Nijhoff.
MSC. 2019. ‘MSC certificates suspended for all North East Atlantic mackerel fisheries’. Press Release. 2019. https://www.msc.org/media-centre/press-releases/press-release/msc-certificates-suspended-for-all-north-east-atlantic-mackerel-fisheries.
NEAFC. 1980. Convention on future multilateral cooperation in North-East Atlantic fisheries. https://www.neafc.org/system/files/Text-of-NEAFC-Convention-04.pdf.
NEAFC. 2011. ‘FAQs about the organisation’. About Webpage 2011. http://www.neafc.org/neafcguide.
Norwegian Ministry of Trade Industry and Fisheries. 2014. ‘Enighet Om Trepartsavtale Om Makrell (Triparty agreement on mackerel)’. Press Release 2014. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/Enighet-om-trepartsavtale-om-makrell/id752940/.
Ørebech, Peter. 2013. The “lost mackerel” of the north East Atlantic—the flawed system of trilateral and bilateral decision-making. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 28 (2): 343–373.
Østhagen, Andreas, and Andreas Raspotnik. 2018. Crab! How a dispute over snow crab became a diplomatic headache between Norway and the EU. Mar Policy 98 (December 2018): 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.09.007.
Østhagen, Andreas, and Andreas Raspotnik. 2019. ‘Why is the European Union challenging Norway over snow crab? Svalbard, special interests, and Arctic governance’. Ocean Development & International Law 50 (2).
Phillipson, Jeremy, and David Symes. 2018. “A sea of troubles”: Brexit and the fisheries question. Mar Policy 90 (April): 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.016.
Pinsky, Malin L., and Michael Fogarty. 2012. Lagged social-ecological responses to climate and range shifts in fisheries. Clim Chang 115 (3–4): 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0599-x.
Pinsky, Malin L., Gabriel Reygondeau, Richard Caddell, Juliano Palacios-Abrantes, Jessica Spijkers, and William W.L. Cheung. 2018. Preparing Ocean governance for species on the move. Science 360 (6394): 1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2360.
Polacheck, Tom. 2012. Politics and independent scientific advice in RFMO processes: a case study of crossing boundaries. Mar Policy 36 (1): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.04.006.
Polasky, Stephen, Stephen R. Carpenter, Carl Folke, and Bonnie Keeler. 2011. Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007.
Popescu, Irina. 2015. ‘Beyond the European seas: the external dimension of the common fisheries policy’. In-Depth Analysis. European Parliament Research Service (EPRS). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/571323/EPRS_IDA(2015)571323_EN.pdf.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int Organ 42 (3): 427–460.
Russell, Dawn A., and David L. VanderZwaag. 2010. Challenges and future directions in transboundary fisheries management: concluding reflections. In Arrangements in light of sustainability principles: Canadian and international perspectives, ed. Recasting Transboundary Fisheries Management, 521–526. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7 (5): 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001.
Scheffer, M., S. Carpenter, J.A. Foley, C. Folke, and B. Walker. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature Genetics 413 (6856): 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/35098000.
Scottish Government. 2016. ‘Scottish Sea fisheries Statistics 2015’. Edinburgh. https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-sea-fisheries-statistics-2015-9781786524300/.
Shearman, David J.C., and Joseph Wayne Smith. 2007. The climate change challenge and the failure of democracy. Westport: Praeger.
Solana, J., and B. Ferrero-Waldner. 2008. ‘Climate change and international security: Paper from the high representative and the European Commission to the European council’. Council doc. 7249/08. Brussels: European Commission. 2008. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/reports/99387.pdf.
Spijkers, Jessica, and Wiebren J. Boonstra. 2017. Environmental change and social conflict: the Northeast Atlantic mackerel dispute. Reg Environ Chang 17 (6): 1835–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1150-4.
Statistics Norway (SSB). 2018. ‘Fiskeri’. Statistics. 2018.
Stokke, Olav Schram. 2006. ‘Examing the consequences of Arctic institutions’. In International cooperation and Arctic governance: Regime effectiveness and northern region building, edited by Olav Schram Stokke and Geir Hønneland, 13–26. New York: Routledge.
Stokke, Olav Schram. 2007. Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. J Bus Res 60 (5): 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.003.
Stokke, Olav Schram. 2012. Disaggregating international regimes: a new approach to evaluation and comparison. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Swartz, Wilf, Enric Sala, Sean Tracey, Reg Watson, and Daniel Pauly. 2010. The spatial expansion and ecological footprint of fisheries (1950 to present). PLoS One 5 (12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015143.
UNCLOS. 1982. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
UNFSA. 1995. The United Nations Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (in force as from 11 December 2001). https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm
Werber, Cassie. 2015. ‘The one that got away: it’s us or the fish, EU Tells Iceland. Iceland Chooses the Fish’ Quartz, 13 March 2015. http://qz.com/362227/its-us-or-the-fish-eu-tells-iceland-iceland-chooses-the-fish/.
Win, Thin Lei. 2017. ‘Iceland reaps riches from warming oceans as fish swim north’. Arctic Now, 21 September 2017. https://www.arcticnow.com/arctic-news/2017/09/21/iceland-reaps-riches-from-warming-oceans-as-fish-swim-north/.
Winthereig, Øssur. 2010. ‘Færøsk Makrelstrid Er Fiskeripolitik Og Ikke Udenrigspolitik’. https://transition.norden.org/en/analys-norden/tema/foreign-policy-change/faeroesk-makrelstrid-er-fiskeripolitik-og-ikke-udenrigspolitik.
Young, Oran R. 1999. The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Young, Oran R. 2010a. Institutional dynamics: emergent patterns in international environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Young, Oran R. 2010b. Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Glob Environ Chang 20 (3): 378–385.
Young, Oran R. 2011. ‘Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies’. PNAS December 13 108 (50): 19853–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Østhagen, A., Spijkers, J. & Totland, O.A. Collapse of cooperation? The North-Atlantic mackerel dispute and lessons for international cooperation on transboundary fish stocks. Maritime Studies 19, 155–165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00172-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00172-4