Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Species Composition of Ants in Cashew Plantations and their Interrelationships with Cashew

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cashew plantations of south west Karnataka, India, foraging activity of 49 ants species belonging to 24 genera and 7 subfamilies were recorded. The study found that ants visited cashew trees regularly throughout the year. Myrmicinae ants were most dominant comprising 22 species followed by Formicinae with 13 species while, among Aenictinae and Dorylinae, only single species was found. Species richness was high in old cashew plantations recording 89.8 % of total species, while medium and young plantations recorded only 46.9 and 24.5 %. Dominance of different ant species was noticed on cashew canopy, trunk and soil in different aged cashew plantations. Old cashew plantations were characterized by Oecophylla smaragdina, followed by Anoplolepis gracillipes, while, Camponotus compressus and C. sericeus were dominant in young and medium aged plantations. Pit fall trap collection consisted mostly of Odontomachus haematodus, Lophomyrmex quadrispinosus, Technomyrmex albipes, Myrmicaria brunnea, Diacamma sp., C. compressus and C. sericeus. During flowering and fruiting period of cashew, foraging of up to 10 ant species was seen on the same tree at a time. Activities of most ant species were predominant during winter and summer which coincides with flowering and fruiting period of cashew (December–May), while during heavy down pour of south west monsoon, activities of only 10 species were seen. A significant positive correlation was found between number of ant species and maximum air temperature (0.842) and also with afternoon soil temperature (0.925).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moorthy VK, Yadukumar N, Raj Shankar (2007) Hand book on organic cashew cultivation. Varanasi Research Foundation, Manipal Press Ltd., Mumbai, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cashew News (2013) The cashew: issues, challenges and strategies. Cashew news. Half yearly Newsletter of Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur 18(1):1–2

  3. Sundararaju D (1993) Compilation of recently recorded and some new pests of cashew in India. Cashew 7:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton B (1994) Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, London, p 222

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (2000) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gadagkar R, Nair P, Chandrasekara K, Bhatt DM (1993) Ant species richness and diversity in some selected localities in Western Ghats, India. Hexapoda 5(20):79–94

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ali TM, Ganeshiah KN (1998) Mapping diversity of ants and root grubs. Curr Sci 75(30):201–204

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bharti H (2012) Indian ants. www.antweb.org/india.jsp. Accessed 14 May 2013

  9. Rickson FR, Rickson MM (1998) The cashew nut, Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae) and its perennial association with ants: extra floral nectary location and the potential for ant defense. Am J Bot 85(6):835–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pathummal Beevi S, Mahapatro GK (2008) Species-spectrum and inter-relationship between ant and spider fauna in cashew agro-ecosystem. J Plant Crops 36(3):375–381

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pillai GB, Dubey OP, Singh Vijaya (1976) Pests of cashew and their control in India: a review of current status. J Plant Crops 4(2):37–50

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ambika B, Abraham CC (1984) Bio-ecology of Helopeltis antonii Sign. infesting cashew trees. In: Rao EVVB, Khan HH (eds) Cashew: research and development. Indian Society for Plantation Crops, Kasaragod, pp 299–300

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sundararaju D (1984) Studies on cashew pests and their natural enemies in Goa. J Plant Crops 12:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peng RK, Christian K, Gibb K (1999) Utilisation of green ants, Oecophylla smaragdina to control cashew insect pests. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peng RK, Lan La Pham, Keith Christian (2014) Weaver ant role in cashew orchards in Vietnam. J Econ Entomol 107(4):1330–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sreekumar KM, Vasavan N, Madhu S, Sijila J, Sreedharan MP, Sreelekha S, Cheriyan T (2011) Managing tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis antonii Sign.) in cashew by augmenting red ants Oecophylla smaragdina (F.). J Plantn Crops 39(1):110–113

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson AN (1990) The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: a review and a recipe. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 16:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cashew News (2013) Micronutrients in cashew. Cashew News. Half Yearly newsletter of Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur. 18 (2): 1-2

  19. Tilman D (1978) Cherries, ants and tent caterpillars: timing of nectar production in relation to susceptibility of caterpillars to ant predation. Ecology 59:686–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiala B, Maschwitz U (1992) Food bodies and their significance for obligate ant-association in the tree genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc (London) 110:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Majer JD, Kitching RL, Heterick BE, Hurley K, Brenan KEC (2001) North south patterns within ant species assemblages from rain forests in Eastern Australia. Biotropica 33(4):643–661

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ali TM (1991) Ant fauna of Karnataka-1. Newslett of IUSSI Indian Chapter 5:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ali TM (1992) Ant fauna of Karnataka-1. Newslett of IUSSI Indian Chapter 6:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ramachandra TV, Subash Chandran MD, Joshi NV, Ajay Narendra, Ali TM (2012) Ant species composition and diversity in the Sharavathi River Basin, Central Western Ghats. Sahyadri Conservation Series 3. ENVIS Technical Report: 20

  25. O’Dowd DJ, Green PT, Lake PS (2003) Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecol Lett 6(9):812–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hatada A, Ishiguro S, Hoffman B (2006) Pheidole megacephala. Global invasive species database. Invasive species specialist group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, Global Invasive Species Programme. <http://www.issg.org/database/species/ecology.asp?si=132&fr=1&sts=>. Accessed 2 Jan 2013

  27. Soans AB, Soans JS (1971) A case of intergeneric competition and replacement in the ants, Oecophylla samragdina Fab. and Anoplolepis longipes Jerdon (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 68(1):289–290

    Google Scholar 

  28. Viswanathan G, Narendra A (2000) The effect of urbanization on the biodiversity of ants in Bangalore. J Ecobiol 12(2):115–122

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bharti H, Sharma Yash Paul, Kaur Amritdeep (2009) Seasonal patterns of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Punjab Shivalik. Halteres 1(1):10–24

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wanger J, Jakubczyk H and Woajcik Z (1997) Liuence des fourmis sur la modification des sols et des plants dans le milieu des praires. In: Phillipson J (ed) Methods of study in soil ecology. Proceedings of Paris symposium. UNESCO, Paris, pp 235–240

  31. Manmohan AA, Coddington J, Colwell RK (2000) Flying as a survival strategy for wood ants in a fragmented landscape (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Memorab Zool 48:147–170

    Google Scholar 

  32. Itioka T, Kawano S (2011) Myrmecosymbiosis in the Bornean Macaranga species with special reference to food bodies (Beccarian bodies) and extra floral nectaries. Plant Species Biol 16(3):241–246

    Google Scholar 

  33. Joshi S (2008) Records of aphids and aphidocolous ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Karnataka. Entomon 33(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reddy DNR and Puttaswamy (1984) Pests infesting chilli (Capsicum annum L.) in the nursery. Mysore J Agric Sci 18:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fletcher TB (1917) Drugs and dyes (Eds) Rep Proc Second Ent Meet Pusa, 340 pp

  36. Ayyar PNK (1963) Handbook of economic entomology for South India. Government of Madras, Madras

    Google Scholar 

  37. Abraham CC, Remamony KS (1978) New records of myrmicinae ants and as pests of bhendi, Abelmoschus esculentus Moench. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 75(1):242–243

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rosy PA, Narendran TC (1985) Study on the predaceous habits of some species of ants of Malabar and their potential as biological control agents of insect pests. Proceedings of national seminar entomopathogenic institute Calicut, pp 70–71

  39. Offenberg J, Havanon S, Aksornkoae S, Macintosh DJ, Nielsen MG (2004) Observations on the ecology of weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina Fabricius) in a Thai mangrove ecosystem and their effect on herbivory of Rhizophora mucronata Lam. Biotropica 36:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fernandes L, Mesquitea AM (1995) Anacardium occidentale (cashew) pollen allergy in patients with allergic bronchial asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 95:501–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Freitas BM, Paxton RJ (1998) A comparison of two pollinators: the introduced honey bee Apis mellifera and an indigenous bee Centris tarsata on cashew Anacardium occidentale in its native range of NE Brazil. J Appl Ecol 35:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Himender Bharti, Department of Zoology, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India for identifying the ant species. They thank the Director, Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur for encouragement and support during the studies. They also thank the anonymous reviewers for suggestions in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Vanitha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanitha, K., Bhat, P.S., Raviprasad, T.N. et al. Species Composition of Ants in Cashew Plantations and their Interrelationships with Cashew. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 87, 399–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0600-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0600-3

Keywords

Navigation