Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of Laser Tattoo Removal: Optical Clearing Agents and Multiple Same-Day Treatments via the R0 and R20 Methods

  • Laser Therapy (J Jagdeo, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Dermatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Now more than ever, there is an increasing demand for effective and efficient laser tattoo removal methods. Different variables can be manipulated in order to improve delivery and outcomes in laser tattoo removal. Originally, alterations in pulse duration, wavelength, lasing medium, and fluence were utilized to enhance laser tattoo removal results. In contrast, research has shifted to improving the delivery of laser light to the tattoo pigments. Development laser light delivery utilizing perfluorodecalin (PFD), optical clearing agents (OCA), R20, and R0 methods have revolutionized the field. As a result, the number of treatments and time per treatment has decreased while still remaining effective. A look into the literature has shown promising but limited results with the aforementioned technologies for laser tattoo removal. Further studies are needed to make definitive statements regarding R20, R0, and OCAs in laser tattoo removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Laser therapy for unwanted tattoos. ASDS website. [Last accessed on 2015 Aug 16]. Available from https://www.asds.net/_PublicResources.aspx?id=6073

  2. Bergstrom KG. Tattoo removal: new laser options. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(4):492–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herd RM, Alora MB, Smoller B, Arndt KA, Dover JS. A clinical and histologic prospective controlled comparative study of the picosecond titanium:sapphire (795 nm) laser versus the Q-switched alexandrite (752 nm) laser for removing tattoo pigment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(4):603–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross V, Naseef G, Lin G, et al. Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(2):167–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saedi N, Metelitsa A, Petrell K, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Treatment of tattoos with a picosecond alexandrite laser: a prospective trial. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(12):1360–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman JR, Kaufman J, Metelitsa AI, Green JB. Picosecond lasers: the next generation of short-pulsed lasers. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2014;33(4):164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kossida T, Rigopoulos D, Katsambas A, Anderson RR. Optimal tattoo removal in a single laser session based on the method of repeated exposures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(2):271–7. One of the first studies to propose and support the use of multi-pass therapy, known as R20 in laser tattoo removal. This study was one of the first to studies to provide a way to circumvent optical scattering due to superficial whitening reaction.

  8. Reddy K, Brauer JA, Anolik R, Bernstein L, Brightman L, Hale E, et al. Topical perfluorodecalin resolves immediate whitening reactions and allows rapid effective multiple pass treatment of tattoos. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(2):76–80. The first randomized controlled study utilizing R0 in laser tattoo removal and comparing it to conventional therapy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luebberding S, Alexiades-Armenakas M. New tattoo approaches in dermatology. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32(1):91–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Biesman BS, O’Neil MP, Costner C. Rapid, high-fluence multi-pass q-switched laser treatment of tattoos with a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch: a pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2015;47(8):613–8. This proof of concept split tattoo study presents an in-depth evaluation and discussion on PFD use in laser tattoo removal.

  11. Bernstein EF. Commentary: on Biesman et al. rapid, high-fluence multi-pass Q-switched laser treatment of tattoos with a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch: a pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2015;47(8):619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah SD, Aurangabadkar SJ. Newer trends in laser tattoo removal. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015;8(1):25–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sardana K, Ranjan R, Ghunawat S. Optimising laser tattoo removal. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015;8(1):16–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McNichols RJ, Fox MA, Gowda A, Tuya S, Bell B, Motamedi M. Temporary dermal scatter reduction: quantitative assessment and implications for improved laser tattoo removal. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36(4):289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vargas G, Chan KF, Thomsen SL, Welch AJ. Use of osmotically active agents to alter optical properties of tissue: effects on the detected fluorescence signal measured through skin. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(3):213–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox MA, Diven DG, Sra K, Boretsky A, Poonawalla T, Readinger A, et al. Dermal scatter reduction in human skin: a method using controlled application of glycerol. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(4):251–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu C, Zhi Z, Tuchin VV, Luo Q, Zhu D. Enhancement of skin optical clearing efficacy using photo-irradiation. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(2):132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss ET, Geronemus RG. Combining fractional resurfacing and Q-switched ruby laser for tattoo removal. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(1):97–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricotti CA, Colaco SM, Shamma HN, Trevino J, Palmer G, Heaphy Jr MR. Laser-assisted tattoo removal with topical 5% imiquimod cream. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(9):1082–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elsaie ML, Nouri K, Vejjabhinanta V, Rivas MP, Villafradez-Diaz LM, Martins A, et al. Topical imiquimod in conjunction with Nd:YAG laser for tattoo removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(6):871–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy MJ. A novel, simple and efficacious technique for tattoo removal resulting in less pain using the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(4):1445–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. ON Light Sciences® DeScribe Transparent PFD Patch: physician perspective. [Last accessed on 2016 Feb 22]. Available from http://onlightsciences.com/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology at Sidney Kimmel Medical College, 833 Chestnut Suite #740, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA

    Richard L. Torbeck & Nazanin Saedi

  2. Thomas Jefferson Department of Dermatology, 833 Chestnut Street, Suite 740, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA

    Richard L. Torbeck

Authors
  1. Richard L. Torbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nazanin Saedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Torbeck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Richard L. Torbeck and Dr. Nazanin Saedi declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Laser Therapy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torbeck, R.L., Saedi, N. Optimization of Laser Tattoo Removal: Optical Clearing Agents and Multiple Same-Day Treatments via the R0 and R20 Methods. Curr Derm Rep 5, 136–141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-016-0139-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-016-0139-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation