Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Teledermoscopy for Teledermatology

  • Teledermatology (D Oh, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Dermatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teledermatology is the remote delivery of dermatologic services and clinical information using telecommunications technology. One of the main potential benefits of teledermatology is providing patients and primary care physicians, especially those in medically underserved and remote communities, access to dermatologists. Other foreseeable benefits include improving healthcare access and delivery, reducing wait times for physician visits, and increasing overall cost savings. As the field of teledermatology has continued to expand, teledermoscopy, which involves the transmission of dermoscopic images in order to obtain a remote diagnosis of pigmented or non-pigmented skin lesions and rashes, is increasingly being utilized. However, very few studies have examined how teledermoscopy affects diagnostic accuracy in teledermatology. In this comprehensive review of the literature, we provide a summary of studies involving teledermoscopy, its uses, its advantages, and some of its future barriers and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lallas A, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Longo C, Moscarella E, Di Lernia V, et al. Dermoscopy in general dermatology [In eng]. Dermatol Clin. 2013;31:679–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kittler H, Seltenheim M, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic informativeness of compressed digital epiluminescence microscopy images of pigmented skin lesions compared with photographs [In eng]. Melanoma Res. 1998;8:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Provost N, Kopf AW, Rabinovitz HS, Stolz W, DeDavid M, Wasti Q, et al. Comparison of conventional photographs and telephonically transmitted compressed digitized images of melanomas and dysplastic nevi [In eng]. Dermatology. 1998;196:299–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Piccolo D, Smolle J, Wolf IH, Peris K, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Dell’Eva G, et al. Face-to-face diagnosis vs telediagnosis of pigmented skin tumors: a teledermoscopic study [In eng]. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:1467–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piccolo D, Smolle J, Argenziano G, Wolf IH, Braun R, Cerroni L, et al. Teledermoscopy—results of a multicentre study on 43 pigmented skin lesions [In eng]. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:132–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wohltmann W. Teledermoscopy of pigmented lesions: a pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:AB76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheraz A, Halpern S. Influence of additional dermoscopy images on teledermatology screening of skin lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165:136.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warshaw EM, Lederle FA, Grill JP, Gravely AA, Bangerter AK, Fortier LA, et al. Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms [In eng]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:753–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kroemer S, Fruhauf J, Campbell TM, Massone C, Schwantzer G, Soyer HP, et al. Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening: diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermoscopic image tele-evaluation using cellular phones [In eng]. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:973–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Massone C, Brunasso AM, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Gulia A, Soyer HP. Teledermoscopy: education, discussion forums, teleconsulting and mobile teledermoscopy [In eng]. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2010;145:127–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Binder M, Kittler H, Dreiseitl S, Ganster H, Wolff K, Pehamberger H. Computer-aided epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions: the value of clinical data for the classification process [In eng]. Melanoma Res. 2000;10:556–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stolz W, Schiffner R, Pillet L, Vogt T, Harms H, Schindewolf T, et al. Improvement of monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions with the use of a computerized acquisition and surveillance unit with a skin surface microscopic television camera [In eng]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ross EK, Vincenzi C, Tosti A. Videodermoscopy in the evaluation of hair and scalp disorders [In eng]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:799–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gewirtzman AJ, Braun RP. Computerized digital dermoscopy [In eng]. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2003;2:14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nami N, Massone C, Rubegni P, Cevenini G, Fimiani M, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. Concordance and time estimation of store-and-forward mobile teledermatology compared to classical face-to-face consultation [In eng]. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbieri, J. S., C. A. Nelson, K. D. Bream, and C. L. Kovarik: Primary care providers’ perceptions of mobile store-and-forward teledermatology [In eng]. Dermatol Online J 21, 2015

  17. Oakley AM. Mobile teledermatology is here to stay [In eng]. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:856–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blum A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Luedtke H, Ellwanger U, Steins A, Roehm S, et al. Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis [In eng]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18:665–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan E, Yung A, Jameson M, Oakley A, Rademaker M. Successful triage of patients referred to a skin lesion clinic using teledermoscopy (iImage It Trial) [In eng]. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:803–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Borve A, Terstappen K, Sandberg C, Paoli J. Mobile teledermoscopy—there’s an app for that! [In eng]. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2013;3:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan E, Oakley A, Soyer HP, Haskett M, Marghoob A, Jameson M, et al. Interobserver variability of teledermoscopy: an international study [In eng]. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:1276–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fabbrocini G, Balato A, Rescigno O, Mariano M, Scalvenzi M, Brunetti B. Telediagnosis and face-to-face diagnosis reliability for melanocytic and non-melanocytic ‘pink’ lesions [In eng]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:229–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Senel E, Baba M, Durdu M. The contribution of teledermatoscopy to the diagnosis and management of non-melanocytic skin tumours [In eng]. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:60–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Warshaw EM, Hillman YJ, Greer NL, Hagel EM, MacDonald R, Rutks IR, et al. Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: a systematic review [In eng]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:759–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Heijden JP, Thijssing L, Witkamp L, Spuls PI, de Keizer NF. Accuracy and reliability of teledermatoscopy with images taken by general practitioners during everyday practice [In eng]. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:320–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Mr. Eric Arch for his contributions in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Sean Ranjit Singh, Gloria Nguyen & Trilokraj Tejasvi

  2. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Sean Ranjit Singh & Arjun P. Meka

  3. Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Trilokraj Tejasvi

Authors
  1. Sean Ranjit Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arjun P. Meka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gloria Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Trilokraj Tejasvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trilokraj Tejasvi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Sean Ranjit Singh, Arjun P. Meka, Dr. Gloria Nguyen, and Dr. Trilokraj Tejasvi declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Teledermatology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, S.R., Meka, A.P., Nguyen, G. et al. Teledermoscopy for Teledermatology. Curr Derm Rep 5, 71–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-016-0133-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-016-0133-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation