Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of a Cast Fixed Partial Denture Compared to Soldered Fixed Partial Denture Made of Two Different Base Metal Alloys and Casting Techniques: An In vitro Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The periodontal health of abutment teeth and the durability of fixed partial denture depends on the marginal adaptation of the prosthesis. Any discrepancy in the marginal area leads to dissolution of luting agent and plaque accumulation. This study was done with the aim of evaluating the accuracy of marginal fit of four unit crown and bridge made up of Ni–Cr and Cr–Co alloys under induction and centrifugal casting. They were compared to cast fixed partial denture (FPD) and soldered FPD. For the purpose of this study a metal model was fabricated. A total of 40 samples (4-unit crown and bridge) were prepared in which 20 Cr–Co samples and 20 Ni–Cr samples were fabricated. Within these 20 samples of each group 10 samples were prepared by induction casting technique and other 10 samples with centrifugal casting technique. The cast FPD samples obtained were seated on the model and the samples were then measured with travelling microscope having precision of 0.001 cm. Sectioning of samples was done between the two pontics and measurements were made, then the soldering was made with torch soldering unit. The marginal discrepancy of soldered samples was measured and all findings were statistically analysed. The results revealed minimal marginal discrepancy with Cr–Co samples when compared to Ni–Cr samples done under induction casting technique. When compared to cast FPD samples, the soldered group showed reduced marginal discrepancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF (2006) Contemporary fixed prosthodontics, 4th edn. Mosby-year Book, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne G (2011) Soldering in prosthodontics—an overview. J Prosthodont 20:233–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziebert GJ et al (1980) Accuracy of one piece castings, preceramic and postceramic soldering. J Prosthet Dent 43:272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malone WFP, Koth DL (1989) Tylman‘s theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics, 8th edn. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  5. Willis LM (1980) Distortion in dental soldering as affected by gap distance. J Prosthet Dent 43:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huling JS (1977) Compratative distortion in three unit fixed prostheses joined by laser welding, conventional soldering or casting in one-piece. J Dent Res 56:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sass F, Eames W (1980) Fit of unit-cast fixed partial dentures related to casting ring size and shape. J Prosthet Dent 43:163–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson O (1985) Casting accuracy of a nickel and beryllium-free cobalt–chromium alloy for crown and bridge prostheses and resin-bonded bridges. Swed Dent J 9:105–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinman R et al (1985) Improving the casting accuracy of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 53:466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmes JR, Bayne SC (1982) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cogolludo PG, Suarez MJ, Peláez J, Lozano JF (2010) Influence of melting and casting methods and finish line design on the marginal discrepancy of nickel-chromium-titanium alloy crowns. Int J Prosthodont 23(5):443–445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasloff Z (1961) Casting techniques and some variables. J Prosthet Dent 11:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anusavice KJ (2003) Phillips science of dental materials, 11th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 295–345

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu JC, Lai LC, Sheets CG, Earthman J, Newcomb R (2011) A comparison of the marginal adaptation of cathode-arc vapor-deposited titanium and cast base metal copings. J Prosthet Dent 105(6):403–409

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gegauff AG (1989) The seating of one-piece and soldered fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 62:292–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Calesini G (2000) One-piece castings in fixed prosthodontics; a study of marginal adaptation using computerized SEM images. Int J Prosthodont 13:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Milan FM, Consani S, Correr Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Sousa-Neto MD, Knowles JC (2004) Influence of casting methods on marginal and internal discrepancies of complete cast crowns. Braz Dent J 15:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruce R (1967) Clinical applications of multiple unit castings for fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 18:359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bauer JR (2006) Microhardness of Ni–Cr alloys under different casting conditions. Braz Oral Res 20:40–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Konstantoulakis E (1998) Marginal fit and surface roughness of crowns made with an accelerated casting technique. J Prosthet Dent 80:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schilling ER (1999) Marginal gap of crowns made with a phosphate-bonded investment and accelerated casting method. J Prosthet Dent 18:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madan N (1999) An investigation into the accuracy of fit of a cast fixed partial denture compared to a soldered fixed partial denture—an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 10:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fusayama T et al (1964) Accuracy of F.P.Ds made by various soldering techniques and one piece casting. J Prosthet Dent 14:334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stackhouse JA (1967) Assembly of dental units by soldering. J Prosthet Dent 18:131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SY, Lee JH (2010) Effect of soldering techniques and gap distance on tensile strength of soldered Ni–Cr alloy joint. J Adv Prosthodont 2(4):117–121

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Brintha Jei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jei, J.B., Mohan, J. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of a Cast Fixed Partial Denture Compared to Soldered Fixed Partial Denture Made of Two Different Base Metal Alloys and Casting Techniques: An In vitro Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14, 104–109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0286-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0286-2

Keywords

Navigation