Skip to main content
Log in

The EU–China Bilateral Investment Treaty: a challenging first test of the EU’s evolving BIT model

  • Article
  • Published:
China-EU Law Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The EU–China Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) is a genuine landmark in bilateral trade and investment relations and the evolution of the EU’s Common Commercial Policy. However, negotiating a BIT with China presents distinct challenges, primarily due to the radical differences that exist between the EU and China’s legal frameworks, their differing values and levels of development, and the structural features of their economic models. The EU’s evolving BIT model is still in the very early stages of its development, and China remains generally cautious on consent to international arbitration tribunals. This paper makes a novel contribution to the literature on EU–China investment law in several respects. Firstly, it provides an up-to-date account of how the negotiations for an EU–China BIT have been shaped by competitive externalities, i.e. current developments in the negotiation of Free Trade Agreements or BITs between the EU or China and third parties, or equally those among third-parties excluding both the EU and People’s Republic of China. It thus provides a broader context for understanding the pursuit of an EU–China BIT, framing the initiative in terms of mutual regard for external competitive pressures which threaten both parties with the prospect of disadvantage vis-à-vis key competitors in the others’ market for investment. Secondly, it traces the motivations for a BIT between the EU and China by examining recent bilateral investment and trade disputes, illustrating the potential that a BIT might hold to mitigate future tensions. Thirdly, it frames the proposed BIT in terms of the EU broader trade policy and trade diplomacy goals on China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. European Commission (Impact Assessment Report on the EU–China Investment Relations, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD 185 Europa website 2013). http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ia_2013/swd_2013_0184_en.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2013; European Commission (Commission proposes to open negotiations for an investment agreement with China, Press Release 2013). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-458_en.htm. Accessed 2 June 2013.

  2. WTO members decided in 1996 to set up working groups covering trade and investment, competition policy, and transparency in government procurement. Members agreed in 2004 to proceed with negotiations on only one of the original four Singapore issues, i.e. trade facilitation. WTO (Investment, competition, procurement, simpler procedures 2014). http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/bey3_e.htm. Accessed 18 November 2014.

  3. Heymann 2008, p. 508; Alschner 2014.

  4. Eilmansberger 2009, p. 386.

  5. Id.

  6. Radu 2008, p. 254.

  7. European Commission (Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy, COM2010343 Europa website 2010, p. 4). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147884.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  8. UNCTAD (China—Full list of Bilateral Investment Agreements concluded 2013). http://unctad.org/sections/dite_pcbb/docs/bits_china.pdf. Accessed 13 August 2014; Herbert Smith Freehills (China sued by South Korean property developer at ICSID 2014). http://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2014/11/10/china-sued-by-south-korean-property-developer-at-icsid/. Accessed 14 December 2014.

  9. Tillmann 2011, p. 97.

  10. EUR-Lex (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 12008E207, Official Journal 115, 2008). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12008E207:en:HTML. Accessed 12 November 14.

  11. Shan and Zhang 2011, p. 1068.

  12. Id.

  13. European Commission (EU takes key step to provide legal certainty for investors outside Europe, Europa Website 2012). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=854. Accessed 4 February 14.

  14. Id.

  15. Shan and Zhang 2011, p. 1068.

  16. Id.

  17. Radu 2008, p. 245.

  18. European Commission (Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy, COM2010343 Europa website 2010, p. 5) http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147884.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  19. European Commission (Dispute Settlement, Europa website 2014). http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/dispute-settlement/. Accessed 2 August 14.

  20. European Commission (Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy, COM2010343 Europa website 2010, p. 4). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147884.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  21. European Commission (Commission proposes to open negotiations for an investment agreement with China, Press Release 2013). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-458_en.htm. Accessed 2 June 2013.

  22. European Commission (Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy, COM2010343 Europa website 2010, pp. 6, 7). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147884.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  23. European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies (Negotiations on the EU–Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement concluded, Policy Paper 2014, p. 7). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/536410/EXPO_IDA(2014)536410_EN.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2014.

  24. Eilmansberger 2009, p. 386.

  25. Casarini N (The Evolution of the EU–China relationship: From Constructive Engagement to Strategic Partnership, European Union Institute for Security Studies Occasional Paper 2006, p. 17). http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/occ64.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2013.

  26. European parliament Directorate-General for External Policies (Investor-State Dispute Settlements provisions in the EU’s International Investment Agreements 2014, p. 90). http://www.jura.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/einrichtungen/oeffentliches-recht/lehrende/hindelangs/Studie-fuer-Europaeisches-Parlament/Volume-2-Studies.pdf?1411545557. Accessed 1 January 2015.

  27. Juncker JC Setting Europe in motion (Speech before the European Parliament, Europa website 2014). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-705_en.htm. Accessed 6 December 2014.

  28. ICSID Article 53 s 6. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/partA-chap04.htm. Accessed 4 November 14.

  29. European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies (Negotiations on the EU–Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement concluded, Policy Paper 2014, p. 7). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/536410/EXPO_IDA(2014)536410_EN.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2014.

  30. European Commission (Investment provisions in the EU–Canada Free Trade Agreement 2014, p. 4). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/november/tradoc_151918.pdf. Accessed 4 December 14.

  31. Id., p. 3.

  32. World Bank (ICSID Annual Report, REF K3826.6.I58 1993). http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/03/14/000333037_20130314125619/Rendered/PDF/758520AR0Box370nual0report00PUBLIC0.pdf. Accessed 26 November 14.

  33. Heymann 2008, p. 515.

  34. Case WT/DS248/9. Luo 2007, p. 801.

  35. Ekran Berhad v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/15.

  36. Ku J (Enforcement of ICSID Awards in the People's Republic of China, 2013, p. 32). http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1305&context=faculty_scholarship. Accessed 16 December 14; Herbert Smith Freehills (China sued by South Korean property developer at ICSID 2014). http://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2014/11/10/china-sued-by-south-korean-property-developer-at-icsid/. Accessed 14 December 14.

  37. World Bank (Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People’s Republic of China’, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, 2014). https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/Pages/casedetail.aspx?CaseNo=ARB/14/25. Accessed 14 December 14.

  38. Tza Yap Shum v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/6. Shen 2011, p. 58.

  39. Id.

  40. Ping An Insurance Ltd. v. Kingdom of Belgium, ICSID ARB/12/29. https://icsId.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseno=ARB/12/29. Accessed 23 November 2014.

  41. Trakman 2013, p. 273.

  42. Ping An’s 5 % holding made it the single largest shareholder in Fortis. Financial Times (Ping An in arbitration claim over Fortis 2012). http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/87437290-0620-11e2-bd29-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3OXhKjFHx. Accessed 2 December 2014.

  43. World Bank (ICSID Convention rules and regulations 2014). http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2014; Heymann 2008, p. 510.

  44. Heymann 2008, p. 518.

  45. Article 25 (1), states ‘the jurisdiction of the Centre shall extend to any legal dispute arising directly out of an investment, between a Contracting State (or any constituent subdivision or agency of a Contracting State designated to the Centre by that State) and a national of another Contracting State, which the parties to the dispute consent in writing to submit to the Centre. When the parties have given their consent, no party may withdraw its consent unilaterally.’ World Bank (Jurisdiction of the Centre 2001). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/partA-chap02.htm. Accessed 12 November 2014.

  46. Heymann 2008, p. 518.

  47. WTO (Definition of Services Trade and Modes of Supply 2014). http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/cbt_course_e/c1s3p1_e.htm. Accessed 3 November 2014.

  48. WTO (Trade in Services, The People's Republic of China Final List of Article II MFN Exemptions GATS/EL/135 2002). https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S006.aspx?Query=(@Symbol=%20gats/el/*)%20and%20((%20@Title=%20china%20)%20or%20(@CountryConcerned=%20china))&Language=ENGLISH&Context=FomerScriptedSearch&languageUIChanged=true#. Accessed 2 January 2015.

  49. WTO (Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights 1999). http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2014.

  50. WTO (Dispute Prevention and Settlement 2014). http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm6_e.htm. Accessed 10 October 2014.

  51. WTO (Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures 1999, p. 139). http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/18-trims.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2015.

  52. Yang 2009, p. 223.

  53. Eglin 1997, p. 498.

  54. Yang 2009, p. 224.

  55. Schill 2007, p. 83; Heymann 2008, p. 511.

  56. World Bank Group (MIGA and European Union Co-Insure Coca-Cola Project in Bosnia and Herzegovina, MIGA Press Release, 2000). http://www.miga.org/news/index.cfm?stid=1506&aid=336. Accessed 14 November 2014.

  57. European Commission (EU welcomes new UN Convention on transparency for investor-state dispute settlement, Press Release 2014). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-824_en.htm. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  58. Hanemann T and Rosen DH (China Invests in Europe: Patterns Impacts and Policy Implications, Rhodium Group LLC Report, 2012, p. 32).

  59. Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas (Chinese Investment in Europe 2014, p. 10). http://itemsweb.esade.edu/research/esadegeo/ESADE_IN_PDF.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014.

  60. Hanemann T and Rosen DH (China Invests in Europe: Patterns Impacts and Policy Implications, Rhodium Group LLC Report, 2012, p. 32).

  61. Eurostat (Both inward and outward FDI stocks rose by around 40 % between 2009 and 2012 for the EU 2014). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/2-23012014-BP/EN/2-23012014-BP-EN.PDF. Accessed 2 February 2014.

  62. New York Times (Chinese Carmaker Geely Completes Acquisition of Volvo From Ford 2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/03/business/global/03volvo.html. Accessed 1 January 2012.

  63. Forbes Asia (Life after Ford: Volvo turnaround gains speed under Chinese billionaire owner 2014). http://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2014/10/27/geely-in-swedish/. Accessed 8 December 2014.

  64. New York Times (Under Chinese, a Greek port thrives 2012). http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/business/global/chinese-company-sets-new-rhythm-in-port-of-piraeus.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed 1 November 2012; Wall Street Journal (Bid dropped as EU raises China Wall 2011). http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704415104576065313773996124. Accessed 4 May 2012.

  65. Fosun (Club Med Project 2014). http://www.fosun.com/site/site-adv/upload/i_dzhglb_en.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2014.

  66. Wall Street Journal (Bid dropped as EU raises China Wall 2011). http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704415104576065313773996124. Accessed 4 May 2012.

  67. Hanemann T and Rosen DH (China Invests in Europe: Patterns Impacts and Policy Implications, Rhodium Group LLC Report, 2012, p. 65). http://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/RHG_ChinaInvestsInEurope_June2012.pdf?. Accessed 3 September 2012.

  68. Reuters (Prymsian clinches Draka bid to form cable leader 2011). http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/04/us-draka-prysmian-idUSTRE7131H720110204. Accessed 3 May 2012.

  69. Economist Magazine (European Commission threatens Chinese telecom firms 2013). http://www.economist.com/news/business/21578077-european-commission-threatens-chinese-telecoms-firms-hold. Accessed 3 June 2014.

  70. US House of Representatives Permanent Committee on Intelligence (Investigative Report on the US National Security Issues Posed by Chinese Telecommunications Companies Huawei and ZTE 2013, p. 5). https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Huawei-ZTE%20Investigative%20Report%20%28FINAL%29.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2013.

  71. The Obama administration also filed a claim with the WTO in relation to Chinese subsidies in the auto industry. New York Times (US Panel Cites Risks in Chinese Equipment 2012). http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/09/us/us-panel-calls-huawei-and-zte-national-security-threat.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed 3 January 2013.

  72. European Parliament (EU assessment of security risks posed by Huawei Technologies and ZTE, Questions for written answer to the Commission 2012). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2012-009222+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN. Accessed 1 February 2013.

  73. As of December 2014. Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China FTA Network 2014). http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/english/index.shtml. Accessed 2 December 14.

  74. European Parliament (Trade and Economic Relations with China 2014). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/briefing_note/join/2014/522342/EXPO-INTA_SP%282014%29522342_EN.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2014.

  75. Solís and Katada 2009, p. 24.

  76. Id.

  77. Yang 2009, p. 221.

  78. Okano-Heijmans M (Trade diplomacy in EU–Asia relations: Time for a Rethink, Clingendael Report, 2014, p. 26). http://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/Trade%20Diplomacy%20in%20EU-Asia%20Relations%20-%20Clingendael%20Report%20(Sept%202014).pdf. Accessed 1 December 2014.

  79. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (Agreement among the governments of Japan, the republic of Korea, and the Government of the People’s Republic of China for the promotion, facilitation and protection of investment 2012). http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/announce/2012/5/pdfs/0513_01_01.pdf. Accessed 13 May 13.

  80. Yang 2009, p. 224; Solís and Katada 2009: 4.

  81. Vietnam’s comparable growth rates and levels of development make the country a key competitor for China in attracting European investment. Negotiations for an EU–Vietnam FTA were launched in June 2012, with the 9th round completed in September 2014. European Commission (EU and Vietnam complete ninth round of FTA talks 2014). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1157. Accessed 20 October 2014.

  82. Heymann 2008, p. 507.

  83. Eglin 1997, p. 499.

  84. Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas (Chinese Investment in Europe 2014, p. 29). http://itemsweb.esade.edu/research/esadegeo/ESADE_IN_PDF.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014.

  85. European Commission (EU–China Investment: A Partnership of Equals 2012). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-421_en.htm?locale=en. Accessed 2 January 2013.

  86. Casarini N (The Evolution of the EU–China relationship: From Constructive Engagement to Strategic Partnership, European Union Institute for Security Studies Occasional Paper 2006, p. 12). http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/occ64.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2013.

  87. Id.

  88. European Commission (EU–China Investment: A Partnership of Equals 2012). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-421_en.htm?locale=en. Accessed 2 January 2013.

  89. Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas (Chinese Investment in Europe 2014, p. 10). http://itemsweb.esade.edu/research/esadegeo/ESADE_IN_PDF.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014.

  90. Eurostat (Both inward and outward FDI stocks rose by around 40 % between 2009 and 2012 for the EU 2014). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/2-23012014-BP/EN/2-23012014-BP-EN.PDF. Accessed 2 February 2014.

  91. European Commission (Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy, COM2010343 Europa website 2010, p. 6). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147884.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  92. EU–China Trade Project (Services 2014). http://www.euctp.org/index.php/en/services. Accessed 2 November 2014.

  93. European Services Forum (European Services Industry’s views on EU Investment Policy toward China 2011). http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ESF2011-07-Karel-De-Gucht-EU-China-Investment-Agreement-Final.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2014.

  94. European Commission (Facts and figures on EU–China trade 2014). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/september/tradoc_144591.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2014; Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas (Chinese Investment in Europe 2014, p. 29). http://itemsweb.esade.edu/research/esadegeo/ESADE_IN_PDF.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014.

  95. European Services Forum (European Services Industry’s views on EU Investment Policy toward China 2011). http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ESF2011-07-Karel-De-Gucht-EU-China-Investment-Agreement-Final.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2014.

  96. European Commission (EU and China begin investment talks 2014). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-33_en.htm. Accessed 12 April 2014.

  97. US Treasury Department (US and China Breakthrough Announcement on the Bilateral Investment Treaty Negotiations 2013). http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/U.S.-and-China-Breakthrough-Announcement-.aspx. Accessed 24 October 2014.

  98. Elsig and Dupont 2012, p. 500.

  99. Eilmansberger 2009, p. 385.

  100. Okano-Heijmans M (Trade diplomacy in EU–Asia relations: Time for a Rethink, Clingendael Report, 2014, p. 16). http://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/Trade%20Diplomacy%20in%20EU-Asia%20Relations%20-%20Clingendael%20Report%20(Sept%202014).pdf. Accessed 1 December 2014.

  101. Schutter 2008, p. 235.

  102. European Commission (Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy, COM2010343 Europa website 2010). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147884.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  103. European Commission (Impact Assessment Report on the EU–China Investment Relations, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD 185 Europa website 2013). http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ia_2013/swd_2013_0184_en.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2013.

  104. European Services Forum (European Services Industry’s views on EU Investment Policy toward China 2011). http://www.esf.be/new/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ESF2011-07-Karel-De-Gucht-EU-China-Investment-Agreement-Final.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2014.

  105. European Parliament Directorate-General for Internal Policies (Financial Services in EU Trade Agreements 2014, p. 8). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/536300/IPOL_STU(2014)536300_EN.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2014.

  106. Id. p. 21.

  107. European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies (Negotiations on the EU–Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement concluded, Policy Paper 2014, p. 9). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/536410/EXPO_IDA(2014)536410_EN.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2014.

  108. Id.

  109. US Department of the Treasury (US and China Breakthrough Announcement on the Bilateral Investment Treaty Negotiations 2013). http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/U.S.-and-China-Breakthrough-Announcement-.aspx. Accessed 2 March 2014; PRC State Council (Vice-Premier: Substantial progress on China–US trade issues 2014). http://english.gov.cn/state_council/vice_premiers/2014/08/23/content_281474983038636.htm. Accessed 7 November 2014.

  110. Lardy 2002, p. 156, cited in Yang 2009, p. 224.

  111. Eglin 1997, p. 500.

  112. WTO (Misunderstandings and scare stories: The GATS and investment 2015). http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/gats_factfiction5_e.htm. Accessed 4 January 2015.

  113. Eglin 1997, p. 499.

  114. WTO (Misunderstandings and scare stories): The GATS and investment 2015. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/gats_factfiction5_3.htm. Accessed 4 January 15.

References

  • Alschner W (2014) Regionalism and overlap in Investment Treaty Law: towards consolidation or contradiction. J Int Econ Law 17(2):271–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eglin M (1997) China’s entry into the WTO with a little help from the EU. Int Aff 73(3):489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilmansberger T (2009) Bilateral investment treaties and EU law. Common Market Law Rev 46:393–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsig M, Dupont C (2012) European Union meets South Korea: bureaucratic interests, exporter discrimination and the negotiations of trade agreements. J Common Market Stud 50(3):492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann M (2008) International law and the settlement of investment disputes relating to China. J Int Econ Law 11(3):507–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardy NR (2002) Integrating China into the global economy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y (2007) Engaging the Private Sector: EU–China Trade disputes under the shadow of WTO law? Eur Law J 13(6):800–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu A (2008) Foreign Investors in the EU: Which Best Treatment? Interactions between Bilateral Investment Treaties and EU law. Eur Law J 14(2):237–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schill SW (2007) Tearing down the Great Wall: the new generation investment treaties of the People’s Republic of China. Cardozo J Int Comp Law 15:73–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutter O (2008) Corporate social responsibility European style. Eur Law J 14(2):203–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan W, Zhang S (2011) The Treaty of Lisbon: half way toward a common investment policy. Eur J Int Invest Law 21(4):1047–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen W (2011) The good, the bad or the ugly? A critique of the decision on jurisdiction and competence in Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru. Chin J Int Law 10(1):55–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solís M, Katada SN (2009) Explaining FTA proliferation: a policy diffusion framework. In: Stallings B et al (eds) Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific Rim. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann RB (2011) For a complementary European investment protection. In: Bungenberg M et al (eds) International investment law and EU law. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakman L (2013) The ICSID and Investor-State Arbitration. In: Trakman L, Ranieri N (eds) Regionalism in international investment law. Oxford University Press, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (2009) China’s competitive FTA strategy: realism on a liberal slide. In: Stallings B et al (eds) Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific Rim. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hallinan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hallinan, D. The EU–China Bilateral Investment Treaty: a challenging first test of the EU’s evolving BIT model. China-EU Law J 5, 31–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-016-0065-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-016-0065-8

Keywords

Navigation