Skip to main content
Log in

Establishment of heat treatment cycles for forge welded API L80 tubular joints

  • Forging and rolling: B. A. Behrens
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microstructure design and heat treatment cycle optimization are two vital activities in any metal forming process which involves high working temperature. Much emphasis is given within these activities to achieve desired structural and mechanical properties of the end products. In this paper an attempt has been made to establish innovative and efficient heat treatment cycles for forge welded API L80 tubular joints. A requirement is that the heat treatment is completed within 5 to 6 minutes after welding. The L80 alloy studied here is a medium carbon steel that has abundant oilfield applications. In order to assess optimal heat treatment for the weld zone, displaying a highly transient and nonuniform temperature distribution, continuum modelling of the process has been performed. Forge welding is a process in which two mating surfaces of pipes are heated (within a small confined depth from the contacting surfaces) to a certain temperature and joined by applying a pressure. The whole process is carried out in the solid state producing a weld without weld metal and with narrow heat affected zone (HAZ), which distinguish it from some of the more conventional welding processes available to produce tubular joints. Specific mechanical properties of forge welded L80 tubular joints were obtained by a unique approach to heat treatment and microstructural design at joints as well as HAZ. Heat treatment cycles were estimated in SINTEF’s Smitweld Thermal Cycle Simulator® to compare with the actual forge welding process. A detailed analysis of specimens subjected to Smitweld simulation and forge welding was carried out to study compatibility and to establish optimum heat treatment conditions for forge welding of L80 tubular joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. P. T. Moe, S. Abtahi, Ganesan S. M, S. Støren and W. Rudd. Optimization of a pipe end upsetting process. In 10th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Lyon, France, 23-25 April 2008.

  2. D. Szeliga, P. Matuszyk, R. Kuziak and M. Pietrzyk. Identification of rheological parameters on the basis of various types of plastometric tests. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 125-126, pp. 150-154, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. Ganesan, P. T. Moe, B. Salberg, J. I. Audestad, H. Valberg, W. Rudd and J. S. Burnell- Gray. Design of a small-scale hot forging test. In 11th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Twente, The Netherlands, 27-29 April 2009.

  4. T. V. Rajan, C. P. Sharma and Ashok Sharma. Heat treatment principle and techniques. Fifteenth edition, pp. 35-37, Prentice-Hall, New Delhi, India.

  5. API Specification 5CT. Specification for casing and Tubing. 8th edition, 1st July 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Ganesan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganesan, S.M., Moe, P.T., Vinothkumar, P. et al. Establishment of heat treatment cycles for forge welded API L80 tubular joints. Int J Mater Form 3 (Suppl 1), 343–346 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0777-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0777-1

Keywords

Navigation