Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seed bank and seedling recruitment of endangered Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica (Asteraceae)

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge of seed-bank dynamics and seedling recruitment is crucial for effective in situ conservation of endangered species. Herein, we studied Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in five of nine existing population sites to determine its spatio-temporal regeneration patterns. Our main aims were: (i) to confirm the existence of a soil seed bank and to determine its type and density, (ii) to assess the rate of natural seedling recruitment and the factors affecting seed germination and seedling survival, and (iii) to assess the potential of artificial disturbance regimes to enhance natural seedling recruitment. We used a series of experiments based on long-term seed burial, seedling emergence, germination and seedling establishment in permanent plots and artificial disturbance regimes. We found that this taxon forms a short-lived persistent seed bank and its seed germinability decreases over time. The average germination in situ was 3.8 %. While the moss and herb layer cover supported seedling survival, tree-litter cover negatively affected in situ germination. Turf removal had the strongest positive effect on germination percentage in our three tested in situ treatments, followed by litter removal and no management procedures. Seedling mortality was very high (60–100 % of seedlings died), with no difference determined between the treatments. Our results suggest that seedling recruitment from seed banks and artificial disturbance regimes might be an extremely beneficial conservation protocol to enhance small populations of this critically endangered taxon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander HM, Schrag AM (2003) Role of soil seed banks and newly dispersed seeds in population dynamics of the annual sunflower, Helianthus annuus. J Ecol 91:987–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen WH 1994. Reintroduction of endangered plants. Bioscience 44:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymus (1996) STATISTICA for Windows. [Computer program manual]. StatSoft, Tulsa

  • Bábková-Hrochová M (2004) Banka semen ohrožených druhů při Vlastivědném muzeu v Olomouci a Expozice ohrožených druhů rostlin [Seed bank of endangered species at Nature Museum in Olomouc and Exposition of endangered plant species]. Zprávy Vlastivědného muzea v Olomouc 281:1–12 [in Czech]

  • Bakker JP, Poschlod P, Strykstra RJ, Bekker RM, Thompson K (1996) Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Bot Neerl 45:461–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (2014) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Batoušek P, Grulich V (1989) Pastarček dlouholistý moravský. Bílé Karpaty, Luhačovice 6:22–25

  • Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Grandin U, Kalamees R, Milberg P, Poschlod P, Thompson K, Willems JH (1998) Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity. Funct Ecol 12:834–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt KG, Koch M, Kropf M, Ulbel M, Webhofer J (2008) Comparison of two methods characterising the seed bank of amphibious plants in submerged sediments. Aquatic Bot 88:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilz M, Kell SP, Maxted N, Lansdown RV (2011) European red list of vascular plants. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D (1992) Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Canad J Bot 70:1603–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucharová A, Brabec J, Münzbergová Z (2012) Effect of land use and climate change on the future fate of populations of an endemic species in central Europe. Biol Conservation 145:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabin RJ, Marshall DL (2000) The demographic role of soil seed banks. I. Spatial and temporal comparisons of below-and above-ground populations of the desert mustard. Lesquerella fendleri. J Ecol 88:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC (1995) Disturbance, life history strategies, and seed fates in alpine herbfield communities. Amer J Bot 82:421–433

  • Chmelová M (2007) Současný stav populací endemického Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica v Bílých Karpatech [Recent status of populations of endemic Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in Bílé Karpaty Mts]. Thesis, Charles University, Prague [in Czech]

  • Cochrane JA, Crawford AD, Monks LT (2007) The significance of ex situ seed conservation to reintroduction of threatened plants. Austral J Bot 55:356–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:119–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dostálek T, Münzbergová Z (2013) Comparative population biology of critically endangered Dracocephalum austriacum (Lamiaceae) in two distant regions. Folia Geobot 48:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliáš P jun, Dítě D, Kliment J, Hrivnák R, Feráková V (2015) Red list of ferns and flowering plants of Slovakia. Biologia 70:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev 57:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, Vander Wall SB (2005) Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CAB International, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gbelcová A (2006) Rozšíření a ekobiologie druhu Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica v Bílých Karpatech [Distribution and ecobiology of Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in the Bílé Karpaty Mts]. Thesis, Ostrava University, Ostrava [in Czech]

  • Gbelcová A (2010) Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica v České republice – populační a ekobiologická studie [Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in the Czech Republic – population and ecobiological study]. Thesis, University of Palacký, Olomouc [in Czech]

  • Grulich V (2012) Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. Preslia 84:631–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlová V, Münzbergová Z (2006) Seed banks of managed and degraded grasslands in the Krkonoše Mts., Czech Republic. Folia Geobot 41:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedüšová K, Škodová I, Janišová M, Kochjarová J (2013) Phytosociological affiliation of Annex II species Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in comparison with two related Tephroseris species with overlapping distribution. Biologia 68:861–871

  • Heinken-Šmídová A, Münzbergová Z (2012) Population dynamics of the endangered, long-lived perennial species, Ligularia sibirica. Folia Geobot 47:193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill NM, Vander Kloet SP. 2005. Longevity of experimentally buried seed in Vaccinum: relationship to climate, reproductive factors and natural seed bank. J Ecol 93:1167–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger KE (1995) Conservation programs for endangered plant species. In Nierenberg WA (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 385–400

  • Hurka H (1994) Conservation genetics and the role of botanical gardens. In Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK (eds) Conservation genetics. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 371–380

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janišová M, Škodová I, Smatanová J, Jongepierová I, Kochjarová J (2005) Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica – population size evaluation and possibilities of its conservation. In Franc V (ed) Strážovské vrchy Mts., research and conservation of nature: proceedings of the Conference, Belušské Slatiny (Slovakia), 1 & 2 October 2004, Bratia Sabovci, Zvolen, pp 29–38

  • Janišová M, Hegedüšová K, Kráľ P, Škodová I (2012a) Ecology and distribution of Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in relation to environmental variation at a micro-scale. Biologia 67:97–109

  • Janišová M, Škodová I, Hegedüšová K (2012b) Reproductive biology of Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica, an endemic taxon of European importance. Seed Sci Res 22:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamees R, Zobel M (2002) The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology 83:1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalisz S, McPeek MA (1992) Demography of an age-structured annual: resampled projection matrices, elasticity analyses, and seed bank effects. Ecology 73:1082–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, Metz JAJ, Val J (1987) Life history tactics of annual organisms: the joint effects of dispersal and delayed germination. Theor Populat Biol 32:127–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochjarová J (1997) Náčrt taxonomickej problematiky rodu Tephroseris v Západných Karpatoch [Schetch of the taxonomical issue on Tephroseris in the Western Carpathians]. Preslia 69:71–93 [in Slovak]

  • Kochjarová J (1998) Poznámky k rozšíreniu, cenológii a ohrozenosti populácií zástupcov rodu Tephroseris (Rchb.) Rchb. na Slovensku II: Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica v Západných Karpatoch [Notes on distribution, coenology and vulnerability of genus Tephroseris (Rchb.) Rchb. in Slovakia II: Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica in the Western Carpathians]. Bull Slov Bot Spoločn 20:69–77 [in Slovak]

  • Kotorová I, Lepš J (1999) Comparative ecology of seedling recruitment in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J Veg Sci 10:175–186

  • Lavorel S, Lepart J, Debussche M, Lebreton JD, Beffy JL (1994) Small scale disturbances and the maintenance of species diversity in Mediterranean old fields. Oikos 70:455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1990) The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. Amer Naturalist 135:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl C (2011) New aspects in plant conservation – phylogeography, population dynamics, genetics and management of steppe plants in Bavaria. PhD Thesis, Universität Regensburg

  • Meindl C, Poschlod P (2007) Das Augsburger Steppengreiskraut – eine Populationsgefährdungsanalyse. Hoppea 68:115–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P (1993) Seed bank and seedlings emerging after soil disturbance in a wet semi-natural grassland in Sweden. Ann Bot Fenn 30:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Olšavská K, Šingliarová B, Kochjarová J, Labdíková Z, Škodová I, Hegedüšová K, Janišová M (2015) Exploring patterns of variation within central-european Tephroseris longifolia agg. (Asteraceae): karyological and morphological study. Preslia 87:163–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck G, Kiehl K, Abs C (2003) Seedling recruitment of Succisella inflexa in fen meadows: Importance of seed and microsite availability. Appl Veg Sci 6:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Pake CE, Venable DL (1996) Seed banks in desert annuals: implications for persistence and coexistence in variable environments. Ecology 77:1427–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakeman RJ, Small JL, Wilson JB (2005) The role of the seed bank, seed rain and the timing of disturbance in gap regeneration. J Veg Sci 16:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippi T (1993) Bet-hedging germination of desert annuals: beyond the first year. Amer Naturalist 142:474–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poschlod P (1996) Population biology and dynamics of a rare short-lived pond mud plant, Carex bohemica Schreber. Verh Ges Ökol 25:321–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Price J, Wright BR, Gross CL, Whalley WRDB (2010) Comparison of seedling emergence and seed extraction techniques for estimating the composition of soil seed banks. Methods Ecol Evol 1:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin H, Jeglum J (2006) The biology of peatlands. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saatkamp A, Affre L, Dutoit T, Poschlod P (2009) The seed bank longevity index revisited: limited reliability evident from a burial experiment and database analyses. Annals Bot 104:715–724

  • Saatkamp A, Poschlod P, Venable DL (2014) The functional role of soil seed banks in natural communities. In Gallagher RS (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 263–295

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Staniforth RJ, Griller N, Lajzerowicz C (1998) Soil seed banks from coastal subarctic ecosystems of Bird Cove, Hudson Bay. Ecoscience 5:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telewski FW, Zeevart JAD (2002) The 120-yr period for Dr Beal’s seed viability experiment. Amer J Bot 89:1285–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K (2000) The functional ecology of soil seed banks. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 215–235

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Grime JP (1979) Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J Ecol 67:893–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Green A, Jewels AM (1994) Seeds in soil and worm casts from a neutral grasslands. Funct Ecol 8:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM (1997) The soil seed banks of north west Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tooren BF, During HJ (1988) Viable plant diaspores in the guts of earthworms. Acta Bot Neerl 37:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venable DL, Lawlor L (1980) Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia 46:272–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002) Demography and role of the seed bank in Mediterranean and desert populations of wild barley. Basic Appl Ecol 5:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widén B (1987) Population biology of Senecio integrifolius (Compositae), a rare plant in Sweden. Nordic J Bot 7:686–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PR, Congdon RA, Grice AC, Clarke PJ (2005) Germinable soil seed banks in a tropical savanna: seasonal dynamics and effects of fire. Austral Ecol 30:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehm A, von Brackel W, Mitlacher K (2008) Hochgradig bedrohte Strandrasenarten – Artenhilfsprogramm am bayerischen Bodenseeufer unter besonderer Berücksichtung der Diasporenbank. Naturschutz Landschaftsplan 40:73–80

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to K. Devánová, J. Košťál, V. Mertan, S. Mertanová, P. Pajger, K. Rajcová, J. Smatanová, H. Vojteková and M. Zajac for their help in the field, and Raymond Marshall for a language review. Our study was financially supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic VEGA 2/0096/15 and the Millennium Seed Bank Project (Kew, Great Britain). Authors contribution: conception of the study and experimental design: MJ; data acquisition: MJ, IŠ, KH, JK; data analyses and interpretation: MJ; manuscript writing: MJ; critical revision of the manuscript: IŠ and JK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Janišová.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Percentage germination and average starting day of germination of T. longifolia subsp. moravica seeds collected in June 2008 from two population sites, Čavoj (C) and Radobica (R).

Appendix 2

Numbers of Seedlings and % Seedling Survival in Transect Plots Sown in 2011 (A) and 2009 (B). Population Sites: O – Omšenie, C – Čavoj, R – Radobica, S – Stráž, L – Lysá

A – Explanation of columns: 1 – Transect_plot; 2 – Number of seeds sown in O (4 July 2011), C (29 June 2011), R (26 June 2011), S (26 June 2011), L (4 July 2011); 3 – Number of seedlings on the 1st survey in O (11 August 2011), C (11 August 2011), R (2 August 2011), S (2 August 2011), L (11 August 2011); 4 – Number of seedlings on the 2nd survey in O (7 June 2012), C (5 June 2012), R (4 June 2012), S (6 June 2012), L (8 June 2012), old/new-recorded; 5 – Number of seedlings on the 3rd survey in O (15 May 2013), C (16 May 2013), R (13 May 2013), S (14 May 2013), L (17 May 2013), old/new-recorded; 6 – Number of seedlings on the 4th survey in O (22 May 2014), C (23 May 2014), R (19 May 2014), S (20 May 2014), L (21 May 2014), old-/new-recorded; 7 – Cumulative number of seedlings; 8 – Number of seeds sown in the control plot; 9–12 – Number of seedlings in the control plots on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th surveys, old/new-recorded; 13 – Corrected cumulative number of seedlings (number of seedlings in the control plot subtracted); 14 – % germination expressed as a proportion from the highest value in 2011; 15 – % seedling survival between the 1st and 2nd surveys, 16 – % seedling survival between the 2nd and 3rd surveys; 17 – % seedling survival between the 3rd and 4th surveys; 18 – % cover of herb layer; 19 – % cover of moss layer; 20 – % cover of bare soil; 21 – % cover of herb litter; 22 – % cover of tree litter; 23 – % cover of disturbed surface.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

O1_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

28

0

1

5

75

0

O1_2

50

8

1/0

0/0

0/0

8

0

0

0

0

0

8

0.333

13

0

 

55

0

0

15

60

0

O1_3

50

5

3/0

0/0

0/0

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

0.208

60

0

 

45

0

1

25

60

0

O1_4

50

1

1/2

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

100

0

 

90

0

0

40

40

0

O1_5

50

0

0/1

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

 

0

 

45

0

0

25

65

0

O2_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

20

0

2

25

60

0

O2_2

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

70

0

0

10

60

0

O2_3

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

75

0

0

7

60

0

O2_4

50

7

0/0

0/1

0/0

8

0

0

0

0

0

8

0.333

0

 

0

40

0

0

60

60

0

O2_5

50

4

3/0

0/0

0/0

4

0

0

0

0

0

4

0.167

75

0

 

60

0

0

15

50

0

O3_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

42

0

0

8

75

0

O3_2

50

0

0/0

0/2

0/0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.083

  

0

65

0

0

20

75

0

O3_3

50

3

0/2

2/0

0/0

5

0

0

0/1

0

0

4

0.167

0

100

 

25

0

1

5

85

0

O3_4

50

3

1/4

0/0

0/0

7

0

0

0

0

0

7

0.292

33

0

 

6

0

10

0

85

0

O3_5

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

4

0

1

0

97

0

C1_1

50

0

0/2

1/1

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

 

50

0

25

0

85

1

10

0

C1_2

50

0

0/2

0/1

0/0

3

0

0

0/1

0

0

2

0.083

 

0

0

20

5

10

0

70

0

C1_3

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

70

25

50

1

22

0

C1_4

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

1

1/0

0

0

-1

0.000

   

20

8

70

1

12

0

C1_5

50

2

2/0

0/0

0/0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.083

 

100

0

21

2

65

0

15

0

C2_1

50

3

1/0

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

33

0

 

70

25

0

5

2

0

C2_2

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

25

60

0

8

5

0

C2_3

50

2

0/1

1/0

1/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

0

100

100

35

40

0

25

5

0

C2_4

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

55

30

2

25

2

2

C2_5

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

55

40

0

30

10

0

C3_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

45

2

3

35

3

2

C3_2

50

3

3/0

2/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

100

67

0

95

5

2

20

0

2

C3_3

50

0

0/0

0/4

4/1

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

0.208

  

100

65

5

3

20

0

5

C3_4

50

12

12/6

15/0

11/0

18

0

0

0/1

0

0

17

0.708

100

83

73

35

25

2

35

2

0

C3_5

50

3

1/0

1/0

1/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

33

100

100

80

1

1

5

0

0

L1_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

60

0

10

0

60

0

L1_2

50

19

8/0

0/2

1/0

21

0

0

0

0/1

0

20

0.833

42

0

50

30

10

45

10

10

15

L1_3

50

8

1/0

0/0

0/0

8

0

0

0

0

0

8

0.333

13

0

 

70

0

30

1

30

0

L1_4

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0/1

1/0

0

0.000

0

  

85

1

20

10

50

0

L1_5

50

0

0/1

1/0

1/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

 

100

100

75

15

10

5

75

0

L2_1

50

2

0/0

0/0

0/0

2

0

0

0/1

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

65

0

0

25

60

0

L2_2

50

4

2/0

0/0

0/0

4

0

0

0/1

0

0

3

0.125

50

0

 

30

0

3

15

75

0

L2_3

50

2

1/0

0/0

0/0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.083

50

0

 

50

0

30

15

55

10

L2_4

50

4

4/5

1/0

1/0

9

0

0

0

0

0

9

0.375

100

11

100

75

0

25

35

35

5

L2_5

50

2

0/1

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

0

0

 

65

0

5

45

50

5

L3_1

50

23

16/1

2/0

0/0

24

0

0

0

0

0

24

1.000

70

12

0

45

1

0

50

4

0

L3_2

50

4

0/0

0/0

0/0

4

0

0

0

0

0

4

0.167

0

  

30

1

30

15

2

30

L3_3

50

1

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

100

0

 

75

1

0

65

10

0

L3_4

50

7

2/0

1/0

0/0

7

0

0

0

0

0

7

0.292

29

50

0

30

1

25

30

1

30

L3_5

50

7

5/0

2/0

1/0

7

0

0

0

0

0

7

0.292

71

40

50

35

0

1

60

10

0

S1_1

50

3

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

0

  

30

0

15

2

60

3

S1_2

50

2

2/0

0/0

0/2

4

0

0

0

0

0

4

0.167

100

0

 

15

5

5

1

50

5

S1_3

50

2

0/4

0/3

0/0

6

0

0

0

0

0

6

0.250

0

0

0

6

5

40

1

35

5

S1_4

50

0

0/1

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0/1

0

0

0.000

 

0

 

5

0

55

3

40

40

S1_5

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

35

0

0

2

90

0

S2_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

35

0

3

1

85

0

S2_2

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

25

0

20

2

60

20

S2_3

50

3

2/0

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.125

67

0

 

10

0

1

1

90

0

S2_4

50

5

2/0

0/0

0/0

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

0.208

40

0

 

12

2

7

3

65

0

S2_5

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

60

0

0

3

50

0

S3_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

35

0

1

30

75

3

S3_2

50

2

0/0

0/0

0/0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.083

0

  

60

0

0

20

60

0

S3_3

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

65

0

0

15

30

0

S3_4

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

40

1

0

10

65

1

S3_5

50

2

1/0

0/0

0/0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.083

50

0

 

45

0

0

15

80

0

S4_1

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

7

0

20

5

70

30

S4_2

50

0

0/1

1/1

0/0

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.083

100

0

 

10

0

2

1

75

3

S4_3

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

12

7

4

20

75

5

S4_4

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0/1

0

0

0

0.000

0

  

25

0

0

10

80

0

S4_5

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

8

15

0

8

80

5

R1_1

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

2

0

0

0

100

0

R1_2

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

4

0

1

0

99

0

R1_3

50

1

1/0

1/0

0/0

1

0

0/3

0

0

0/1

-3

0.000

100

100

0

65

15

0

5

80

0

R1_4

50

5

4/0

3/0

2/0

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

0.208

80

75

67

50

30

0

20

70

0

R1_5

50

5

4/0

0/0

0/0

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

0.208

80

0

 

30

45

0

10

30

0

R2_1

50

0

0/1

0/3

0/0

4

0

0

0

0

0

4

0.167

 

0

0

5

0

1

0

100

0

R2_2

50

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.042

0

  

30

0

2

0

98

0

R2_3

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

60

0

3

2

75

0

R2_4

50

0

0/2

0/0

0/0

2

0

0

0/1

0

0

1

0.042

 

0

 

60

0

4

3

80

0

R2_5

50

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

   

55

0

7

50

50

0

B – Explanation of columns: 1 – Transect_plot; 2 – Number of seeds sown (calculated as average number of well-developed seeds in three capitula, see Janišová et al. 2012b for details) in O (26 June 2009), C (25 June 2009), R (25 June 2009), S (25 June 2009), L (26 June 2009); 3 – Number of seedlings on the 1st survey in O (13 May 2010), C (11 May 2010), R (21 August 2010), S (21 August 2010); 4 – Number of seedlings on the 2nd survey in O (25 May 2011), C (20 May 2011), R (18 May 2011), S (18 May 2011), L (27 May 2011), old/new-recorded; 5 – Number of seedlings on the 3rd survey in O (7 June 2012), C (5 June 2012), R (4 June 2012), S (6 June 2012), L (8 June 2012), old/new-recorded; 6 – Number of seedlings on the 4th survey in O (15 May 2013), C (16 May 2013), R (13 May 2013), S (14 May 2013), L (17 May 2013), old/new-recorded; 7 – Number of seedlings on the 5th survey in O (22 May 2014), C (23 May 2014), R (19 May 2014), S (20 May 2014), L (21 May 2014), old/new-recorded; 8 – Cumulative number of seedlings; 9 – Number of seeds sown in the control plot; 10-14 – Number of seedlings in the control plots on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th surveys, old-/new-recorded; 15 – Corrected cumulative number of seedlings (number of seedlings in the control plot subtracted); 16 – % germination expressed as a proportion from the highest value in 2009; 17 – % seedling survival between the 1st and 2nd surveys, 18 – % seedling survival between the 2nd and 3rd surveys; 19 – % seedling survival between the 3rd and 4th surveys; 20 – % seedling survival between the 4th and 5th surveys; 21 – % cover of herb layer; 22 – % cover of moss layer; 23 – % cover of bare soil; 24 – % cover of herb litter; 25 – % cover of tree litter; 26 – % cover of disturbed surface.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

L4_1

204

8

NA

7/0

5/0

5/0

8

0

NA

0

0

0

0

8

0.727

  

71

100

95

15

0

60

3

0

L4_2

204

3

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

50

30

0

60

20

0

L4_3

204

0

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

55

40

2

50

10

0

L4_4

204

0

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

85

25

0

50

1

20

L4_5

204

0

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

80

1

0

90

1

0

L5_1

204

NA

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

NA

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

55

25

0

25

55

0

L5_2

204

NA

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

NA

1

0

0

0

0.000

    

40

20

0

50

55

0

L5_3

204

NA

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

NA

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

32

10

3

25

50

5

L5_4

204

NA

NA

1

0/0

0/0

1

0

NA

NA

0

0

0

1

0.091

  

0

 

45

1

5

30

45

0

L5_5

204

NA

NA

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

NA

NA

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

55

0

0

10

90

0

O4_1

204

0

0/2

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

 

0

  

80

0

1

1

1

0

O4_2

204

25

8/0

0/1

0/1

0/0

10

0

0

0/1

1/0

0

0

9

0.818

32

0

0

0

22

0

75

2

15

75

O4_3

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

50

0

6

15

80

5

O4_4

204

3

3/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.273

100

0

  

70

0

0

15

65

0

O4_5

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

75

40

0

35

40

0

O5_1

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

45

0

0

1

95

0

O5_2

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

30

0

1

90

0

0

O5_3

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

25

0

1

2

80

0

O5_4

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

65

0

0

1

48

0

O5_5

204

3

2/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.273

67

0

  

45

0

1

50

40

0

S5_1

204

6

4/0

4/0

3/0

3/0

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

0.545

67

100

75

100

7

25

0

20

50

0

S5_2

204

0

0/1

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.091

 

100

0

 

75

2

2

40

15

0

S5_3

204

5

5/0

5/0

5/0

4/0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0.455

100

100

100

80

45

3

1

5

50

0

S5_4

204

1

1/0

1/0

1/0

1/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.091

100

100

100

100

70

25

0

22

35

0

S5_5

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

40

0

2

20

25

0

S6_1

204

7

7/1

2/0

1/0

1/0

7

0

0

0/3

0

0

0

4

0.364

100

25

50

100

60

3

0

45

45

0

S6_2

204

1

0/1

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.091

0

0

  

25

4

3

35

28

0

S6_3

204

8

8/0

7/0

4/0

3/0

8

0

0

0

0

0

0

8

0.727

100

88

57

75

75

1

0

30

35

0

S6_4

204

3

2/0

2/0

1/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.273

67

100

50

0

65

40

0

25

40

0

S6_5

204

15

11/1

9/0

4/0

4/0

15

0

0

0

0

0

0/4

11

1.000

73

75

44

100

62

30

0

20

45

0

R3_1

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

70

0

25

25

15

25

R3_2

204

1

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.091

0

   

30

0

70

4

12

35

R3_3

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

35

0

35

5

25

30

R3_4

204

4

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

0.364

0

   

2

0

95

1

7

75

R3_5

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

32

0

90

0

4

80

R4_1

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

10

100

0

1

5

0

R4_2

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

5

97

0

1

15

0

R4_3

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

20

75

0

2

30

0

R4_4

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

30

20

0

4

90

0

R4_5

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

50

0

0

10

85

0

C4_1

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

75

20

1

60

3

0

C4_2

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

40

10

0

40

10

0

C4_3

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

65

20

0

35

5

0

C4_4

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

85

10

0

5

50

0

C4_5

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.000

    

35

40

0

2

65

0

C5_1

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0/1

1/0

0

-1

0.000

    

40

0

22

20

5

2

C5_2

204

0

0/0

0/4

1/1

0/0

5

0

1

0

0

0

0

4

0.364

  

25

0

30

0

40

5

4

50

C5_3

204

0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/1

-1

0.000

    

25

2

10

55

5

20

C5_4

204

3

2/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0.273

67

0

  

30

12

45

1

3

45

C5_5

204

5

2/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

5

0

0

0

2/0

0

0

3

0.273

40

0

  

35

40

0

4

5

0

Appendix 3

Scatter plots and regression trends expressing relationships between in situ germination and seedling survival of T. longifolia subsp. moravica as dependent variables and plot characteristics as predictors. See Table 1 for details.

Appendix 4

a – Scheme of the management experiment and position of the treatment plots: 1 – not managed, 2 – litter removal, 3 – turf removal, C – non-managed control plot without seed addition. In the control plots, no seedlings were recorded during the experiment (18 September 2012-19 May 2014). b – Number of seedlings in the cultivation ex situ and the treatment plots in situ. Differences in cumulative germination [%] between the treatments in situ tested by ANOVA: F = 16.44, d.f. = 3, P < 0.001. Differences in ‘% survival between the surveys’ between the treatments in situ tested by ANOVA: survey 1 (23 October 2012) – survey 2 (13 May 2013): ANOVA, F = 2.26, d.f. = 3, P=134; survey 2 (13 May 2013) – survey 3 (23 October 2013): ANOVA, F = 1.47, d.f. = 3, P = 0.277.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janišová, M., Škodová, I., Hegedüšová, K. et al. Seed bank and seedling recruitment of endangered Tephroseris longifolia subsp. moravica (Asteraceae). Folia Geobot 51, 343–360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-016-9275-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-016-9275-7

Keywords

Navigation