Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preferences in College Admission

  • Symposium: Varsity Blues
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the college scandal which revealed the influence of wealth on admission into elite institutions. Hess (2019) proposes the selection process for students into elite colleges should be upended and future students should be selected through a lottery-based system. However, such a proposal eliminates the standards of meritocracy and questions the vitality of race-based policies such as affirmative action in college admission. Preferences-based admissions give students a competitive advantage in college admission based on legacy status, race, and/or atletism—race being the most controversial. With the growing attention on the recent college scandal, this article explores the weights given to preferences-based selection into elite institutions and concludes with a consideration of race-neutral alternatives that acknowledges the influence of wealth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Belkin, D. 2019, May 16. SAT to give students ‘adversity score’ to capture social and economic background. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com.

  • Brown, S., & Hirschman, C. 2006. The end of affirmative action in Washington State and its impact on the Transition from High School to College. Sociology of Education, 79(2), 106–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. 2016. Brother Bill: President Clinton and the politics of race and class. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ffjg9

  • Cauce, A. M. 2019, May 3. We need reasoned debate on affirmative action, not mockery. University of Washington. Retrieved from http://www.washington.edu

  • Dynarski, S. 2018. At Elite Colleges, Racial Diversity Requires Affirmative Action. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com

  • Espenshade, T. J., Chung, C. Y., & Walling, J. L. 2004. Admission preferences for minority students, athletes, and legacies at elite universities. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1422–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, D. 2006. The price of admission: How America's ruling class buys its way into elite colleges--and who gets left outside the gates. New York:Crown Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, F. 2019, March 15. A modest proposal regarding college admissions. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com

  • Jaschik, S. 2019a, May 6. Washington state plans to restore affirmative action. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com

  • Jaschik, S. 2019b, May 8. Another parent pleads guilty in admission scandal. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com

  • Karabel, J. 2005. The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, J.D. 1993. The Real Affirmative Action Babies: Legacy Preference at Harvard and Yale. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems Probs. 26(491), 491–521.

  • Lewin, T., & Pérez-Peña, R. 2013, June 24. How Minorities Have Fared in States With Affirmative Action Bans. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com

  • Long, M. 2006. Race and college admissions: An alternative to affirmative action? The Review of Economics and Statistics. (84)4. 1020–1033. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125211

  • McWhorter, J. 2000. Losing the race: Self sabotage in Black America. New York:Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U. S. 265 (1978)

  • Rubin, R. 2014. Who gets in and why? An examination of admissions to America's most selective colleges and universities. International Education Research, 2(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.12735/ier.v2i2p01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, P. 2017. One nation undecided: Clear thinking about five hard issues that divide us. Princeton, NJ:Woodstock, Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. 1997. October 06). How "affirmative action" hurts blacks. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com

  • Sowell, T. 1976. Winter. Affirmative action reconsidered. The Public Interest, 42, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. M. & Yu, B. P. 2017. Makeup of the class. The Crimson. Retrieved from https://features.thecrimson.com/2017/freshman-survey/makeup/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Administrative & Instructional Leadership, School of Education, St. John’s University, Sullivan Hall, 8000 Utopia Pkwy, Jamaica, NY, 11439, USA

    Nia E. Hulse

Authors
  1. Nia E. Hulse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nia E. Hulse.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hulse, N.E. Preferences in College Admission. Soc 56, 353–356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-019-00380-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-019-00380-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation