Skip to main content
Log in

Face to Face

The Perception of Automotive Designs

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over evolutionary time, humans have developed a selective sensitivity to features in the human face that convey information on sex, age, emotions, and intentions. This ability might not only be applied to our conspecifics nowadays, but also to other living objects (i.e., animals) and even to artificial structures, such as cars. To investigate this possibility, we asked people to report the characteristics, emotions, personality traits, and attitudes they attribute to car fronts, and we used geometric morphometrics (GM) and multivariate statistical methods to determine and visualize the corresponding shape information. Automotive features and proportions are found to covary with trait perception in a manner similar to that found with human faces. Emerging analogies are discussed. This study should have implications for both our understanding of our prehistoric psyche and its interrelation with the modern world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgements at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2002). Körpersprache & Kommunikation: Das Handbuch zur nonverbalen Kommunikation (8th ed.). Paderborn: Junfermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & Tumia, M. L. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory, I: A personality description approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atzwanger, K. (1995). Der Steinzeitjäger im Straßenkreuzer: Humanethologische Aspekte aggressiven Auffahrens auf der Autobahn. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna.

  • Autodesk (2006). 3ds Max (Version 8). San Rafael, USA: Autodesk Media & Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, C. R., & Humphries, D. A. (1972). Human non-verbal behaviour, a means of communication. In N. G. Blurton Jones (Ed.), Ethological studies of child behaviour (pp. 37–64). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. (2004). The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 655–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coss, R. G. (2003). The role of evolved perceptual biases in art and design. In E. Voland, & K. Grammer (Eds.), Evolutionary aesthetics (pp. 69–130). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, P. M. A., Hekkert, P., & Jacobs, J. J. (2000). When a car makes you smile: Development and application of an instrument to measure product emotions. In S. J. Hoch & R. J. Meyer (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research 27 (111–117).

  • Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enlow, D. H., & Hans, M. G. (1996). Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erk, S., Spitzer, M., Wunderlich, A. P., Galley, L., & Walter, H. (2002). Cultural objects modulate reward circuitry. NeuroReport, 13, 2499–2503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Grammer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Schaefer, K., Bookstein, F. L., et al. (2005). Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1995–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Core, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comperative Psychology, 108, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition in humans and machines. In T. Shipley, & P. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 463–481). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U., & Blairy, S. (2001). Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dynamic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juergens, M. (2003). Fies à vis. Auto Motor Sport, 25, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., & Segal, M. H. (1977). Facial gestures which influence the perception of status. Sociometry, 40, 374–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C. F., Randall, D. W., Kendrick, T., & Gutshall, K. A. (2003). Do babyfaced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Horner, C., Kashy, D. A., & Chu, L. C. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerssenbrock, F. (2005). Sie leben! Design. Emotion ist alles, wissen Autohersteller—und lassen ihre Modelle immer öfter nach dem Vorbild des menschlichen Gesichts gestalten. Profil, (March) 72–74.

  • Kohler, C. G., Turner, T., Stolar, N. M., Bilker, W. B., Brensinger, C. M., Gur, R. E., et al. (2004). Differences in facial expressions of four universal emotions. Psychiatry Research, 128, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Entfaltung. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5, 235–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, L. S., Shaw, R. E., & Pittenger, J. B. (1988). Natural vonstraints, scales of analysis, and information for the perception of growing faces. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 11–49). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otta, E., Abrosio, F. F. E., & Hoshino, R. L. (1996). Reading a smiling face: Messages conveyed by various forms of smiling. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1111–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittenger, J. B., Shaw, R. E., & Mark, L. S. (1979). Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 478–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. (2005a). tpsDig2 (Version 2.04): Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.

  • Rohlf, F. J. (2005b). tpsPLS (Version 1.18): Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.

  • Rohlf, F. J. (2005c). tpsRegr (Version 1.31): Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.

  • Rohlf, F. J., & Corti, M. (2000). The use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Systematic Biology, 49, 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, K., Fink, B., Mitteroecker, P., Neave, N., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone. Collegium Antropologicum, 29, 415–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirman, D. (2006). Der Citroen DS 19—“Die Göttin.” Design. France: ARTE.

  • Streissguth, A. P., Bookstein, F. L., Sampson, P. D., & Barr, H. M. (1993). The enduring effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on child development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, S., & Schiff, W. (1969). Stimulus factors in observer judgment of social interaction: Facial expression and motion pattern. American Journal of Psychology, 82, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ursi, W. J., Trotman, C. A., McNamara Jr., J. A., & Behrents, R. G. (1993). Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth. Angle Orthodontist, 63, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Anika Bruns for her great support, and F. James Rohlf for his valuable comments and for the adjustment of his program tpsPLS for our purpose. We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful remarks. This work was funded by a research grant from EFS Unternehmensberatung, and, in part, by the Austrian Council for Science and Technology grant GZ 200.093/I-VI/I/2004 and the EU FP6 Marie Curie Actions grant MRTN-CT-2005-019564 (EVAN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Truls Thorstensen or Karl Grammer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Windhager, S., Slice, D.E., Schaefer, K. et al. Face to Face. Hum Nat 19, 331–346 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9047-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9047-z

Keywords

Navigation