Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathology of Human Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Xenografts in NSG Mice

  • Published:
Endocrine Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major impediment to the development of effective treatments for metastatic or unresectable pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas has been the absence of valid models for pre-clinical testing. Attempts to establish cell lines or xenografts from human pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas have previously been unsuccessful. NOD-scid gamma (NSG) mice are a recently developed strain lacking functional B-cells, T-cells, and NK cells. We report here that xenografts of primary human paragangliomas will take in NSG mice while maintaining their architectural and immunophenotypic characteristics as expressed in the patients. In contrast to grafts of cell lines and of most common types of primary tumors, the growth rate of grafted paragangliomas is very slow, accurately representing the growth rate of most pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas even in metastases in humans. Although the model is therefore technically challenging, primary patient-derived xenografts of paragangliomas in NSG mice provide a potentially valuable new tool that could prove especially valuable for testing treatments aimed at eradicating the small tumor deposits that are often numerous in patients with metastatic paraganglioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pacak K, Wimalawansa SJ: Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Pract 21:406–412, 2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benn DE, Robinson BG, Clifton-Bligh RJ: 15 YEARS OF PARAGANGLIOMA: Clinical manifestations of paraganglioma syndromes types 1-5. Endocr Relat Cancer 22:T91-T103, 2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Baudin E, Habra MA, Deschamps F, et al.: Therapy of endocrine disease: treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Endocrinol 171:R111–R122, 2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen JC, van den Berg R, Kuiper A, van der Mey AG, Zwinderman AH, Cornelisse CJ: Estimation of growth rate in patients with head and neck paragangliomas influences the treatment proposal. Cancer 88:2811–2816, 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis RJ, Patel D, Prodanov T, Nilubol N, Pacak K, Kebebew E: The presence of SDHB mutations should modify surgical indications for carotid body paragangliomas. Ann Surg 260:158–162, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lepoutre-Lussey C, Thibault C, Buffet A, et al.: From Nf1 to Sdhb knockout: Successes and failures in the quest for animal models of pheochromocytoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol 421:40–48, 2016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greene LA, Tischler AS: Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73:2424–2428, 1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Powers JF, Evinger MJ, Tsokas P, et al.: Pheochromocytoma cell lines from heterozygous neurofibromatosis knockout mice. Cell Tissue Res 302:309–320., 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martiniova L, Lai EW, Elkahloun AG, et al.: Characterization of an animal model of aggressive metastatic pheochromocytoma linked to a specific gene signature. Clin Exp Metastasis 26:239–250, 2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lussey-Lepoutre C, Hollinshead KE, Ludwig C, et al.: Loss of succinate dehydrogenase activity results in dependency on pyruvate carboxylation for cellular anabolism. Nat Commun 6:8784, 2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tischler AS, Powers JF, Alroy J: Animal models of pheochromocytoma. Histol Histopathol 19:883–895, 2004

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shultz LD, Goodwin N, Ishikawa F, Hosur V, Lyons BL, Greiner DL: Human cancer growth and therapy in immunodeficient mouse models. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2014:694–708, 2014

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Powers JF, Picard KL, Tischler AS: RET expression and neuron-like differentiation of pheochromocytoma and normal chromaffin cells. Horm Metab Res 41:710–714, 2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tischler AS, Ruzicka LA, Riseberg JC: Immunocytochemical analysis of chromaffin cell proliferation in vitro. J Histochem Cytochem 40:1043–1045, 1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Douwes Dekker PB, Corver WE, Hogendoorn PC, van der Mey AG, Cornelisse CJ: Multiparameter DNA flow-sorting demonstrates diploidy and SDHD wild-type gene retention in the sustentacular cell compartment of head and neck paragangliomas: chief cells are the only neoplastic component. J Pathol 202:456–462, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazzatenta A, Marconi GD, Macchi V, et al.: Coexpression of Galanin and Nestin in the Chemoreceptor Cells of the Human Carotid Body. Adv Exp Med Biol 885:77–82, 2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin de Celis MF, Garcia-Martin R, Wittig D, et al.: Multipotent Glia-Like Stem Cells Mediate Stress Adaptation. Stem Cells 33:2037-2051, 2015

  18. Oudijk L, Neuhofer CM, Lichtenauer UD, et al.: Immunohistochemical Expression of Stem Cell Markers in Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma is Associated with SDHx-mutations. Eur J Endocrinol 173:43-52, 2015

  19. Hescot S, Leboulleux S, Amar L, et al.: One-year progression-free survival of therapy-naive patients with malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:4006–4012, 2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Janssen I, Blanchet EM, Adams K, et al.: Superiority of [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT to Other Functional Imaging Modalities in the Localization of SDHB-Associated Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. Clin Cancer Res 21:3888–3895, 2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James F. Powers.

Ethics declarations

Studies of the banked tumor samples were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the National Institutes of Health and Tufts Medical Center. Patients provided written informed consent.

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of Tufts Medical Center.

Funding

This work was supported by the Pheo Para Alliance and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powers, J.F., Pacak, K. & Tischler, A.S. Pathology of Human Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Xenografts in NSG Mice. Endocr Pathol 28, 2–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-016-9452-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-016-9452-5

Keywords

Navigation