Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resource Utilization in Clubfoot Management

  • Symposium: Clubfoot: Etiology and Treatment
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

An Erratum to this article was published on 16 January 2010

Abstract

Both private and socialized healthcare systems require treatments to be not only effective, but also cost-efficient. Although the Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment is effective, its cost-effectiveness has not been demonstrated. We compared the difference in resource use between two prospective cohorts treated for clubfoot by either the Ponseti method or below-knee casting followed by primary surgical release in the socialized healthcare system of New Zealand. Using these cohorts and US billing data, costs of treating these cohorts in the US healthcare system were also calculated. Treatment of initial deformity, recurrences, and complications in both cohorts were included in the final assessment. Twenty-six patients (40 feet) were enrolled in the Ponseti cohort and 29 (46 feet) in the primary surgical cohort. For most patients, the Ponseti method was more cost-effective than the primary surgical treatment in both healthcare systems. The cost of treating both cohorts was lower in the socialized system than in the US healthcare system.

Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beals RK. Club foot in the Maori: a genetic study of 50 kindreds. N Z Med J. 1978;88:144–146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colburn M, Williams M. Evaluation of the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by using the Ponseti method. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42:259–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1477–1489.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cosma D, Vasilescu D, Vasilescu D, Valeanu M. Comparative results of the conservative treatment in clubfoot by two different protocols. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16:317–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford AH, Marxen JL, Osterfeld DL. The Cincinnati incision: a comprehensive approach for surgical procedures of the foot and ankle in childhood. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1355–1358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz FR. Treatment of a recurrent clubfoot deformity after initial correction with the Ponseti technique. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:625–629.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:986–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA. Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:22–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:323–327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA. Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:487–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heilig MR, Matern RV, Rosenzweig SD, Bennett JT. Current management of idiopathic clubfoot questionnaire: a multicentric study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:780–787.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:517–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1286–1294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ippolito E, Fraracci L, Caterini R, Di Mario M, Farsetti P. A radiographic comparative study of two series of skeletally mature clubfeet treated by two different protocols. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:446–453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ippolito E, Mancini F, Di Mario M, Farsetti P. A comparison of resultant subtalar joint pathology with functional results in two groups of clubfoot patients treated with two different protocols. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:358–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:23–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113:376–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. New Zealand Government. Statistics in New Zealand. Ethnic group for the census usually resident population count 2001. Available at: www.stats.govt.nz. Accessed November 3, 2006.

  19. Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:448–454.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ponseti IV. The ponseti technique for correction of congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1889–1890.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tindall AJ, Steinlechner CW, Lavy CB, Mannion S, Mkandawire N. Results of manipulation of idiopathic clubfoot deformity in Malawi by orthopaedic clinical officers using the Ponseti method: a realistic alternative for the developing world? J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:627–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jan E. Davison, the clubfoot nurse specialist at Starship Children’s Health Auckland, New Zealand, for her time and effort in caring for these children. In addition, we thank Jan for her help in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew A. Halanski MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1234-7

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

figure a

About this article

Cite this article

Halanski, M.A., Huang, JC., Walsh, S.J. et al. Resource Utilization in Clubfoot Management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 1171–1179 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0674-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0674-9

Keywords

Navigation