Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of added surfactant on particle flocculation in waterborne polymer–particle systems

  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymer–particle interactions can cause particle flocculation and phase separation problems in waterborne coatings. The problems can be the result of interactions that are either too weak or too strong. It is known by empirical work that addition of surfactants can minimize these problems. In this study, the authors have investigated how different types of surfactants influence the polymer–particle interactions. Both hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles were included in the study, and nonionic, anionic, and cationic surfactants were used. A simple model is suggested that can be used to predict the surfactant concentration needed to stabilize the system. The model considers the cmc (critical micelle concentration) of the surfactant, the adsorption to the polymer, and the adsorption to the particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

cmc:

critical micelle concentration

EHEC:

ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose

HM-EHEC:

hydrophobically modified EHEC

DSethyl :

average degree of substitution of ethyl groups per anhydroglucose unit

MSEO :

average molar substitution of ethylene oxide per anhydroglucose unit

MShydrophobe :

average molar substitution of nonyl phenol groups per anhydroglucose unit

M w :

weight-average molecular weight

M n :

number-average molecular weight

PSL:

polystyrene latex particles with a mean diameter of 350 nm

silica:

silica particles with a mean diameter of 10 nm

T cp :

cloud-point temperature

T c :

critical temperature where the aqueous polymer–particle system phase separates

η* :

complex viscosity

c s :

surfactant concentration

c hydrophobe :

concentration of nonyl phenol groups attached to EHEC

c s,i :

total surfactant concentration where phase inversion occurs

c sf :

concentration of free surfactant

c sf,i :

concentration of free surfactant at phase inversion

c sb :

concentration of surfactant bound to the polymer

c sb,i :

concentration of surfactant bound to the polymer at phase inversion

c sa :

concentration of surfactant adsorbed onto particle surface

c sa,i :

concentration of surfactant adsorbed onto particle surface at phase inversion

c p :

total concentration of polymer

c particles :

total concentration of particles (g/L)

A sp :

specific area of the particles

A s :

area covered by one mole of surfactants at full surface coverage

b i :

the number of bound surfactant molecules per polymer molecule

References

  1. Karlström G. A new model for upper, lower critical solution temperatures in poly (ethylene oxide) solutions, J Phys Chem, 89, 4962–4 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karlström G, A Carlsson, B Lindman. Phase diagrams of nonionic polymer-water systems. Experimental and theoretical studies of the effects of surfactants and other cosolutes. J Phys Chem, 94, 5005–15 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asakura S, F Osawa. On interaction between two bodies immersed in a solution of macromolecules. J Chem Phys, 22, 1255–6 (1954)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, DF, Wennerström, H, The Colloidal Domain. Where Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Technology Meet (2nd ed.), pp. 415–416. Wiley, New York, 1999, ISBN: 0 4710 24247 0

  5. Olsson, M, Joabsson, F, Piculell, L, “Particle-induced Phase Separation in Quasi-binary Polymer Solution.” Langmuir, 20 (5) 1605–1610 (2004); Olsson, M, Linse, P, Piculell, L, “Influence on the Phase Behavior of a Polymer Solution by Added Particles Analyzed by Meanfield Lattice Theory.” Langmuir, 21 (23) 10862–10870 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karlson L, F Joabsson, K Thuresson. Phase behavior and rheology in water and in model paint formulations thickened with HM-EHEC: influence of the chemical structure and the distribution of hydrophobic tails. Carbohydrate Polymers, 41, 25–35 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mukerjee, P, Mysels, KJ, Critical Micelle Concentrations of Aqueous Surfactant Systems. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1971) ISSN: 0097–0395

  8. Olsson M, F Joabsson, L Piculell. Influence of added particles on the phase behavior of polymer solutions. Analysis by mean-field lattice theory. Langmuir, 20, 1605–10 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mears S J, T Cosgrove, T Obey, L Thompson, I Howell. Dynamic light scattering and small-angle neutron scattering studies on the poly(ethylene oxide)/sodium dodecyl sulfate/polystyrene latex system. Langmuir 14, 4997–5003 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cosgrove T, SJ Mears, T Obey, L Thompson, RD Wesley. Polymer, particle, surfactant interactions. Colloid Surf A, 149, 329–38 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lauten RA, A-L Kjøniksen, B Nyström. Adsorption and desorption of unmodified and hydrophobically modified ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose on polystyrene latex particles in the presence of ionic surfactants using dynamic light scattering. Langmuir, 16, 4478–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shubin V. Adsorption of cationic polymer onto negatively charged surfaces in the presence of anionic surfactant. Langmuir, 10, 1093–100 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghodbane J, R Denoyel. Competitive adsorption between non-ionic polymers and surfactants on silica. Colloid Surf A, 127, 97–104 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rachas I, TF Tadros, P Taylor. The displacement of adsorbed polymer from silica surfaces by the addition of a nonionic surfactant. Colloid Surf A, 161, 307–19 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thuresson K, B Lindman. Effect of hydrophobic modification of a non-ionic cellulose derivative on the interaction with surfactants. Phase behavior and association. J Phys Chem B, 101, 6460–8 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rojas OJ, M Ernstsson, RD Neuman, PM Claesson. Effect of polyelectrolyte charge density on the adsorption and desorption behavior on mica. Langmuir, 18, 1604–12 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Casford MTL, PB Davies, D Neivandt. Study of the coadsorption of an anionic surfactant and an uncharged polymer at the aqueous solution/hydrophobic surface interface by sum frequency spectroscopy. Langmuir, 19, 7386–91 2003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Levitz P, A El Miri, D Keravis, H Van Damme. Adsorption of non-ionic surfactants at the solid-solution interface and micellization – a comparative fluorescence decay study. J Colloid Interface Sci, 99, 484–92 (1984)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tiberg F, B Jönsson, J Tang, B Lindman. Ellipsometry studies of the self-assembly of nonionic surfactants at the silica water interface – equilibrium aspects. Langmuir, 10, 2294–300 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner SF, SM Clarke, AR Rennie, PN Thirtle, DJ Cooke, ZX Li, RK Thomas (1999) Adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate to a polystyrene/water interface studied by neutron reflection and attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy. Langmuir, 15, 1017–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Romero-Cano MS, A Martin-Rodriguez, FJ de las Nieves .Adsorption and desorption of triton X-100 in polystyrene particles with different functionality – I. Adsorption study. J Colloid Interface Sci, 227, 322–8 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Geffroy C, MAC Stuart, K Wong, B Cabane, V Bergeron. Adsorption of non-ionic surfactants onto polystyrene: Kinetics and reversibility. Langmuir, 16, 6422–30 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin S-Y, C Dong, T-J Hsu, C-T Hsu. Determination of adsorption of an ionic surfactant on latex from surface tension measurements. Colloid Surf A, 196, 189–98 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thuresson K, O Söderman, P Hansson, G Wang. Binding of SDS to ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose. Effect of hydrophobic modification of the polymer. J Phys Chem, 100, 4909–18 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thuresson K, B Lindman, B Nyström. Effect of hydrophobic modification of a nonionic cellulose derivative on the interaction with surfactants. Rheology. J Phys Chem B, 101, 6450–9 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Piculell L, K Thuresson, O Ericsson. Surfactant binding and micellisation in polymer solutions and gels: binding isotherms and their consequences. Faraday Discussions, 101, 307–18 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Piculell L, M Egermayer J Sjöström. Rheology of mixed solutions of an associating polymer with a surfactant. Why are different surfactants different?. Langmuir, 19, 3643–9 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Karlson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlson, L., Olsson, M., Boström, G. et al. Influence of added surfactant on particle flocculation in waterborne polymer–particle systems. J Coat Technol Res 5, 447–454 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-008-9094-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-008-9094-8

Keywords

Navigation