Abstract
Polymer–particle interactions can cause particle flocculation and phase separation problems in waterborne coatings. The problems can be the result of interactions that are either too weak or too strong. It is known by empirical work that addition of surfactants can minimize these problems. In this study, the authors have investigated how different types of surfactants influence the polymer–particle interactions. Both hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles were included in the study, and nonionic, anionic, and cationic surfactants were used. A simple model is suggested that can be used to predict the surfactant concentration needed to stabilize the system. The model considers the cmc (critical micelle concentration) of the surfactant, the adsorption to the polymer, and the adsorption to the particles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- cmc:
-
critical micelle concentration
- EHEC:
-
ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose
- HM-EHEC:
-
hydrophobically modified EHEC
- DSethyl :
-
average degree of substitution of ethyl groups per anhydroglucose unit
- MSEO :
-
average molar substitution of ethylene oxide per anhydroglucose unit
- MShydrophobe :
-
average molar substitution of nonyl phenol groups per anhydroglucose unit
- M w :
-
weight-average molecular weight
- M n :
-
number-average molecular weight
- PSL:
-
polystyrene latex particles with a mean diameter of 350 nm
- silica:
-
silica particles with a mean diameter of 10 nm
- T cp :
-
cloud-point temperature
- T c :
-
critical temperature where the aqueous polymer–particle system phase separates
- η* :
-
complex viscosity
- c s :
-
surfactant concentration
- c hydrophobe :
-
concentration of nonyl phenol groups attached to EHEC
- c s,i :
-
total surfactant concentration where phase inversion occurs
- c sf :
-
concentration of free surfactant
- c sf,i :
-
concentration of free surfactant at phase inversion
- c sb :
-
concentration of surfactant bound to the polymer
- c sb,i :
-
concentration of surfactant bound to the polymer at phase inversion
- c sa :
-
concentration of surfactant adsorbed onto particle surface
- c sa,i :
-
concentration of surfactant adsorbed onto particle surface at phase inversion
- c p :
-
total concentration of polymer
- c particles :
-
total concentration of particles (g/L)
- A sp :
-
specific area of the particles
- A s :
-
area covered by one mole of surfactants at full surface coverage
- b i :
-
the number of bound surfactant molecules per polymer molecule
References
Karlström G. A new model for upper, lower critical solution temperatures in poly (ethylene oxide) solutions, J Phys Chem, 89, 4962–4 (1985)
Karlström G, A Carlsson, B Lindman. Phase diagrams of nonionic polymer-water systems. Experimental and theoretical studies of the effects of surfactants and other cosolutes. J Phys Chem, 94, 5005–15 (1990)
Asakura S, F Osawa. On interaction between two bodies immersed in a solution of macromolecules. J Chem Phys, 22, 1255–6 (1954)
Evans, DF, Wennerström, H, The Colloidal Domain. Where Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Technology Meet (2nd ed.), pp. 415–416. Wiley, New York, 1999, ISBN: 0 4710 24247 0
Olsson, M, Joabsson, F, Piculell, L, “Particle-induced Phase Separation in Quasi-binary Polymer Solution.” Langmuir, 20 (5) 1605–1610 (2004); Olsson, M, Linse, P, Piculell, L, “Influence on the Phase Behavior of a Polymer Solution by Added Particles Analyzed by Meanfield Lattice Theory.” Langmuir, 21 (23) 10862–10870 (2005)
Karlson L, F Joabsson, K Thuresson. Phase behavior and rheology in water and in model paint formulations thickened with HM-EHEC: influence of the chemical structure and the distribution of hydrophobic tails. Carbohydrate Polymers, 41, 25–35 (2000)
Mukerjee, P, Mysels, KJ, Critical Micelle Concentrations of Aqueous Surfactant Systems. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1971) ISSN: 0097–0395
Olsson M, F Joabsson, L Piculell. Influence of added particles on the phase behavior of polymer solutions. Analysis by mean-field lattice theory. Langmuir, 20, 1605–10 (2004)
Mears S J, T Cosgrove, T Obey, L Thompson, I Howell. Dynamic light scattering and small-angle neutron scattering studies on the poly(ethylene oxide)/sodium dodecyl sulfate/polystyrene latex system. Langmuir 14, 4997–5003 (1998)
Cosgrove T, SJ Mears, T Obey, L Thompson, RD Wesley. Polymer, particle, surfactant interactions. Colloid Surf A, 149, 329–38 (1999)
Lauten RA, A-L Kjøniksen, B Nyström. Adsorption and desorption of unmodified and hydrophobically modified ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose on polystyrene latex particles in the presence of ionic surfactants using dynamic light scattering. Langmuir, 16, 4478–84 (2002)
Shubin V. Adsorption of cationic polymer onto negatively charged surfaces in the presence of anionic surfactant. Langmuir, 10, 1093–100 (1994)
Ghodbane J, R Denoyel. Competitive adsorption between non-ionic polymers and surfactants on silica. Colloid Surf A, 127, 97–104 (1997)
Rachas I, TF Tadros, P Taylor. The displacement of adsorbed polymer from silica surfaces by the addition of a nonionic surfactant. Colloid Surf A, 161, 307–19 (2000)
Thuresson K, B Lindman. Effect of hydrophobic modification of a non-ionic cellulose derivative on the interaction with surfactants. Phase behavior and association. J Phys Chem B, 101, 6460–8 (1997)
Rojas OJ, M Ernstsson, RD Neuman, PM Claesson. Effect of polyelectrolyte charge density on the adsorption and desorption behavior on mica. Langmuir, 18, 1604–12 (2002)
Casford MTL, PB Davies, D Neivandt. Study of the coadsorption of an anionic surfactant and an uncharged polymer at the aqueous solution/hydrophobic surface interface by sum frequency spectroscopy. Langmuir, 19, 7386–91 2003
Levitz P, A El Miri, D Keravis, H Van Damme. Adsorption of non-ionic surfactants at the solid-solution interface and micellization – a comparative fluorescence decay study. J Colloid Interface Sci, 99, 484–92 (1984)
Tiberg F, B Jönsson, J Tang, B Lindman. Ellipsometry studies of the self-assembly of nonionic surfactants at the silica water interface – equilibrium aspects. Langmuir, 10, 2294–300 (1994)
Turner SF, SM Clarke, AR Rennie, PN Thirtle, DJ Cooke, ZX Li, RK Thomas (1999) Adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate to a polystyrene/water interface studied by neutron reflection and attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy. Langmuir, 15, 1017–23
Romero-Cano MS, A Martin-Rodriguez, FJ de las Nieves .Adsorption and desorption of triton X-100 in polystyrene particles with different functionality – I. Adsorption study. J Colloid Interface Sci, 227, 322–8 (2000)
Geffroy C, MAC Stuart, K Wong, B Cabane, V Bergeron. Adsorption of non-ionic surfactants onto polystyrene: Kinetics and reversibility. Langmuir, 16, 6422–30 (2000)
Lin S-Y, C Dong, T-J Hsu, C-T Hsu. Determination of adsorption of an ionic surfactant on latex from surface tension measurements. Colloid Surf A, 196, 189–98 (2002)
Thuresson K, O Söderman, P Hansson, G Wang. Binding of SDS to ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose. Effect of hydrophobic modification of the polymer. J Phys Chem, 100, 4909–18 (1996)
Thuresson K, B Lindman, B Nyström. Effect of hydrophobic modification of a nonionic cellulose derivative on the interaction with surfactants. Rheology. J Phys Chem B, 101, 6450–9 (1997)
Piculell L, K Thuresson, O Ericsson. Surfactant binding and micellisation in polymer solutions and gels: binding isotherms and their consequences. Faraday Discussions, 101, 307–18 (1995)
Piculell L, M Egermayer J Sjöström. Rheology of mixed solutions of an associating polymer with a surfactant. Why are different surfactants different?. Langmuir, 19, 3643–9 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karlson, L., Olsson, M., Boström, G. et al. Influence of added surfactant on particle flocculation in waterborne polymer–particle systems. J Coat Technol Res 5, 447–454 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-008-9094-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-008-9094-8