Skip to main content
Log in

Performance analysis and improvement of geothermal binary cycle power plant in oilfield

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to improve the efficiency of a geothermal power plant, oil wells in the high water cut stage were used as geothermal wells, thereby improving the recovery ratio and economic benefit. A new function that reflects both the technical and economic performances was put forward and used as the objective function. An organic Rankine cycle (ORC) was analyzed through the energetic and exergetic analyses, and the reasons for low efficiency were pinpointed. Results indicate that geothermal water directly transferring heat to the working fluid reduces energy dissipation and increases cycle efficiencies. The net power output with an internal heat exchanger (IHE) is averagely 5.3% higher than that without an IHE. R601a and R601 can be used to replace R123 for geothermal water below 110 °C. Moreover, the modified ORC dramatically outperforms the actual one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical abstract 2010 [R]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. BARBIER E. Geothermal energy technology and current status: An overview [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 2002, 6(1/2): 3–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DRESCHER U. Optimierungspotenzial des Organic Rankine Cycle für geothermische und biomassebefeuerte Wärmequellen [D]. Berlin: University Bayreuth, 2008. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. HAN Gang. Study on computational method of the water flooded layer aqueous saturation in high water cut stage [D]. Daqing: Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2008. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. TIAN Yu-jiang. Technical research of using geothermal water for heat tracing system in gathering system of oil field [D]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum, 2009. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. HETTIARACHCHI H D M, GOLUBOVIC M, WOREK W M, IKEGAMI Y. Optimum design criteria for an organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources [J]. Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1698–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. BORSUKIEWICZ-GOZDUR A, NOWAK W. Maximising the working fluid flow as a way of increasing power output of geothermal power plant [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27: 2074–2078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. HEBERLE F, BRÜGGEMANN D. Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal organic Rankine cycle for combined heat and power generation [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(11/12): 1326–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SALEH B, KOGLBAUER G, WENDLAND M, FISCHER J. Working fluids for low temperature organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy, 2007, 32(7): 1210–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DESAI N B, BANDYOPADHYAY S. Process integration of organic Rankine cycle [J]. Energy, 2009, 34(10): 1674–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KANOGLU M, BOLATTTURK A. Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy [J]. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(11): 2366–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. YARI M. Exergetic analysis of various types geothermal power plants [J]. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(1): 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YARI M. Performance analysis of the different organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) using dry fluids [J]. International Journal of Exergy, 2009, 6(3): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. GUO T, WANG H X, ZHANG S J. Comparative analysis of natural and conventional working fluids for use in transcritical Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal source [J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2011, 35(6): 530–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HUA Jun-ye, CHEN Ya-ping, LIU Hua-jin, WU Jia-feng. Thermodynamic analysis of simplified dual-pressure ammonia-water absorption power cycle [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(3): 797–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. WANG Zhi-qi, ZHOU Nai-jun, LUO Liang, ZHANG Jia-qi, TONG Dao-hui. Comparison of thermodynamic performance for waste heat power generation system with different low temperature working fluids [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology,, 2010, 41(6): 2424–2429. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. WANG Zhi-qi, ZHOU Nai-jun, GUO Jing, WANG Xiao-yuan. Parametric optimization of low-temperature waste heat power generation system by simulated annealing algorithm [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2012, 43(1): 366–371. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. MARTIN H. A theoretical approach to predict the performance of chevron-type plate heat exchangers [J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 1996, 35(4): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. KHAN T S, KHAN M S, CHYU M C, AYUB Z H. Experimental investigation of single phase convective heat transfer coefficient in a corrugated plate heat exchanger for multiple plate configurations [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(8/9): 1058–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. COOPER M G. Heat flows rates in saturated pool boiling: A wide ranging examination using reduced properties, advances in heat transfer [M]. Florida: Academic Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. PALM B, CLAESSON J. Plate heat exchanger: calculation methods for single and two-phase flow [J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2006, 27(4): 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DIPIPPO R. Second Law assessment of binary plants generating power from low temperature geothermal fluids [J]. Geothermics, 2004, 33(4): 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ARSLAN O, KOSE R. Exergoeconomic optimization of integrated geothermal system in Simav, Kutahya [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2010, 51(4): 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WANG Jiang-feng, DAI Yi-ping, GAO Lin. Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(6): 941–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. KANOGLU M. Exergy analysis of a dual-level binary geothermal power plant [J]. Geothermics, 2002, 31(6): 709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de VRIES B, TILLNER-ROTH R, BAEHR H D. Thermodynamic properties of HCFC 124 [C]// Nineteenth international congress of refrigeration. The Hague: International Institution of Refrigeration, 1995: 582–589.

    Google Scholar 

  27. MIYAMOTO H, WATANABE K. A thermodynamic property model for fluid-phase isobutene [J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2002, 23(2): 477–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. PLATZER B, POLT A, MAURER G. Thermophysical properties of refrigerants [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. CALM J M, HOURAHAN GC. Refrigerant data update [J]. Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering, 2007, 79(1): 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MIYAMOTO H, WATANABE K. Thermodynamic property model for fluid-phase n-butane [J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2001, 22(2): 459–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zhang  (张伟).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2012AA052804) supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Tl., Zhu, Jl. & Zhang, W. Performance analysis and improvement of geothermal binary cycle power plant in oilfield. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 457–465 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1507-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1507-x

Key words

Navigation