Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Bhakta and the Sage: An Intertextual Dialogue

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparing the Bhagavad Gītā and the Buddhist essay “Prajñā is Not-knowing” (Panruo Wuzhi 般若無知) yields interesting insights. The texts have similar dialogical structures and discuss complex philosophical matters. Rhetorically, both texts weave together quotations and allusions from other texts, make liberal use of paradox, and have decidedly spiritual intentions. Their differences, though, remain striking. They emerge from distinct circumstances and their original languages (Sanskrit, Chinese) differ markedly. Stylistically, “Prajñā” is more intellectual and less devotional, espousing a distinctly “this worldly” ideal; by contrast, the Gītā is more dramatic. While espousing “this worldly” ideals, the Gītā is more inclusive and thus more accessible to a broad audience; on the contrary, “Prajñā” has a subtler effect, its “dark” qualities appealing to a more select group. Therefore, while these texts are not “the same,” reading across their convergences and divergences can lead to a deeper understanding of mysticism and cross-cultural spirituality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, Masao. 2004. “God, Emptiness, and the True Self.” In The Buddha Eye: An Anthology of the Kyoto School and Its Contemporaries, edited by Frederick Franck. Revised ed. Bloomington: World Wisdom Inc.

  • Berthrong, John H. 1999. The Divine Deli: Religious Identity in the North American Cultural Mosaic. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clooney, Francis X. 1993. Theology after Vedānta: An Experiment in Comparative Theology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, Robert K. C. 1990. “Introduction: Mysticism, Constructivism, and Forgetting.” In The Problem of Pure Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy, edited by Robert K. C. Forman. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1992. “The Diversity of Europe: Inheritance and Future.” In Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics, edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson, trans. by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Happold, F. C. 1963. Mysticism: A Study and an Anthology. Baltimore: Penguin Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Steven T. 1992. “Mystical Speech and Mystical Meaning.” In Mysticism and Language, edited by Steven T. Katz. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenthal, Walter. 1968. Chao Lun: The Treatises of Seng-chao, a Translation with Introduction, Notes and Appendices. 2nd revised ed. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Merton, Thomas. 1972. New Seeds of Contemplation. New York: New Directions Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, Stephen. 2010. God is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Gene, trans. 2008. The Lotus Sutra: A Contemporary Translation of a Buddhist Classic. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

  • Robinson, Richard H. 1958. “Mysticism and Logic in Seng-Chao’s Thought.” Philosophy East and West 8: 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1967. Early Madhyamika in India and China. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweig, Graham M. 2007. Bhagavad Gītā: The Beloved Lord’s Secret Song of Love. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jonathan Z. 2000. “In Comparison a Magic Dwells.” In A Magic Still Dwells: Comparative Religion in the Postmodern Age, edited by Kimberley C. Patton and Benjamin C. Ray. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, W. T. 1960. Mysticism and Philosophy. New York: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, John M. 2008. Understanding Prajñā: Sengzhao’s “Wild Words” and the Search for Wisdom. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaehner, R. C. 1970. Concordant Discord: Interdependence of Faiths. New York and London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Christopher Newport University, 1 Avenue of the Arts, Newport News, VA, 23606, USA

    John M. Thompson

Authors
  1. John M. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.M. The Bhakta and the Sage: An Intertextual Dialogue. Dao 13, 23–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9355-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9355-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation