Skip to main content
Log in

Techno-economic assessment of pulverized coal boilers and IGCC power plants with CO2 capture

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current studies on power plant technologies suggest that Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) systems are an effective and economic CO2 capture technology pathway. In addition, the system in conventional configuration has the advantage of being more “CO2 capture ready” than other technologies. Pulverized coal boilers (PC) have, however, proven high technical performance attributes and are economically often most practical technologies. To highlight the pros and cons of both technologies in connection with an integrated CO2 capture, a comparative analysis of ultrasupercritical PC and IGCC is carried out in this paper. The technical design, the mass and energy balance and the system optimizations are implemented by using the ECLIPSE chemical plant simulation software package. Built upon these technologies, the CO2 capture facilities are incorporated within the system. The most appropriate CO2 capture systems for the PC system selected for this work are the oxy-fuel system and the postcombustion scheme using Monoethanolamine solvent scrubber column (MEA). The IGCC systems are designed in two configurations: Water gas shift reactor and Selexol-based separation. Both options generate CO2-rich and hydrogen rich-gas streams. Following the comparative analysis of the technical performance attributes of the above cycles, the economic assessment is carried out using the economic toolbox of ECLIPSE is seamlessly connected to the results of the mass and energy balance as well as the utility usages. The total cost assessment is implemented according to the step-count exponential costing method using the dominant factors and/or a combination of parameters. Subsequently, based on a set of assumptions, the net present value estimation is implemented to calculate the breakeven electricity selling prices and the CO2 avoidance cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiesa P, Consonni S, Kreutz T, Williams R. Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30: 747–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H C, Loos M and Meyer L A, eds. IPCC, 2005: IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 54–88

  3. McMullan J T, Williams B C, Campbell P, McILveen-Wright D R, Bemtgen J M. Techno-economic assessment studies of fossil fuel and fuel wood power generation technologies, R&D in clean coal technology. JOULE II Programme, European Commission, CIEMAT, 1995, ISBN 84 7843 280 X

  4. Williams, B C, McMullan, J T. Techno-economic analysis of fuel conversion and power generation systems-the development of a portable chemical process simulator with capital cost and economic performance analysis capabilities. Int J Energy Research, 1996, 20: 125–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezvani S, Bolland O, Franco F, Huang Y, Span R, Keyser J, Sander F, McIIveen-Wright D and Hewitt N. Natural gas oxy-fuel cycles—Part 3: Economic evaluation. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 565–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang Y, Rezvani S, McIlveen-Wright D, Minchener A, Hewitt N. Techno-economic study of CO2 capture and storage in coal fired oxygen fed entrained flow IGCC power plants. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(9): 916–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rezvani S, Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Wang Y D. Comparative assessment of sub-critical versus advanced super-critical oxy-fuel PF boilers with CO2 sequestration facilities. Fuel, 2007, 86: 2134–2143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Rezvani S, Wang Y D, Hewitt N, Williams B C. Biomass co-firing in a pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) combined cycle power plant: A technoenvironmental assessment based on computational simulations. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87: 927–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davison J, Bressan L, Domenichim R. CO2 capture in coal based IGCC power plants. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vancouver, Canada, September, 2004, Volume 1

  10. Campbell P E, McMullan J T, Williams B C. Concept for a competitive coal fired integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. Fuel, 2000, 79: 1031–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rezvani S, Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Hewitt N, Mondol J. Comparative assessment of coal fired IGCC systems with CO2 capture using physical absorption, membrane reactors and chemical looping. Fuel, 2009, 86: 2463–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans R, Huang Y, Williams B C. The influence of feedstock properties on the techno-economic performance of coal fired IGCC, IchemE. Gasification for the Future, The Netherlands, 2004, 8: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weishaupt R. Purification and CO conversion downstream the gasification. In: 7th European Gasification Conference. Barcelona, April 25–27, 2006

  14. Davison J. Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2. Energy, 2007, 32: 1163–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holt N, Booras G, Todd D. A summary of recent IGCC studies of CO2 capture for sequestration. In: The Gasification Technologies Conference San Francisco, October, 2003

  16. Ordorica-Garcia G, Douglas P, Croiset E, Zheng L G. Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47, 2250–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sundkvist S G, Klang Å, Sjödin M, Wilhelmsen K, Åsen K, Tintinelli A, McCahey S, Huang Y. AZEP gas turbine combined cycle power plants-thermal optimisation and LCA analysis. Greenhouse gas control technologies, 2005, 7: 263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sekkappan G, Melling P J, Anheden M, Lindgren G, Kluger F, Molinero I S, Maggauer C, Doukelis A. Oxy-fuel technology for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical pulverized fuel plants. In: 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Trondheim Norway, Proceedings of GHGT-8, June, 2006

  19. Dillon D, Panesar R, Wall R, Allam R, White V, Gibbins J, Haines M. Oxy-combustion processes for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical PF and NGCC power plant. In: 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Vancouver, September, 2004, Volume 1

  20. Rezvani S, Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Wang Y D. Comparative assessment of sub-critical versus advanced super-critical oxy-fuel PF boilers with CO2 sequestration facilities. Fuel, 2007, 86: 2134–2143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neville H E. Gasification and IGCC—Design issues & opportunities. The GCEP Advanced Coal Workshop, Utah, March 15–16, 2005

  22. John G, John D. Transmission of CO2—safety and economic considerations, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Energy, 2004, 29: 1319–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerrard A M. Guide to capital cost estimating. IchemE 2000, Institution of Chemical Engineers, ISBN-13: 9780852953990

  24. GTW. Gas turbine world. GTW, Victor de Biasi, 2006 Handbook, Vol 25

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Rezvani, S., McIlveen-Wright, D. et al. Techno-economic assessment of pulverized coal boilers and IGCC power plants with CO2 capture. Front. Chem. Eng. China 4, 196–206 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-009-0237-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-009-0237-y

Keywords

Navigation