Skip to main content
Log in

Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy procedural guide

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Da Vinci robotic surgical platform has rapidly been adopted by skilled surgeons for procedures in gynecologic oncology. The lack of specific procedural guides and surgical atlases for robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology produces challenges in the education of trainees in their role both as the assistant and as the console surgeon. This procedural guide was developed in order to facilitate trainee education in the technical aspects of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the Da Vinci robotic surgical platform. Patient selection, preparation, and the technical aspects of robotic radical hysterectomy are described from both the standpoint of the console surgeon and the bedside assistant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, Fowler WC (2008) A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(4):357.e1-7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A (2009) A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 113(3):357–361 (Epub 2009 Apr 5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fanning J, Hojat R, Johnson J, Fenton B (2009) Robotic radical hysterectomy. Minerva Ginecol 61(1):53–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):649.e1-4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 108(2):312–316 (Epub 2007 Nov 26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM (2008) Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):425–430 (Epub 2008 Oct 16)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113(2):191–194 (Epub 2009 Feb 26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, Peiretti M, Sanguineti F, Bocciolone L, Colombo N, Landoni F, Roviglione G, Vélez JI (2009) Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecol Oncol 115(1):60–64 (Epub 2009 Jul 28)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Magrina JF, Kho R, Magtibay PM (2009) Robotic radical hysterectomy: technical aspects. Gynecol Oncol 113(1):28–31 (Epub 2009 Jan 26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magrina JF, Zanagnolo VL (2008) Robotic surgery for cervical cancer. Yonsei Med J 49(6):879–885 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):86–91 (Epub 2008 Feb 14)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 12(3):227–237

    Google Scholar 

  13. Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, Ramirez PT (2008) A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):584–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramirez PT, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Dos Reis R, Frumovitz M (2008) Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110(3 Suppl 2):S21–S24 (Epub 2008 May 19. Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sert B, Abeler V (2007) Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 3(3):224–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sert BM, Abeler VM (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 27(5):531–533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith AL, Pareja R, Ramirez PT (2009) Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review. Minerva Ginecol 61(4):339–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrow CP, Curtin JP (eds) (1996) Gynecologic cancer surgery. W. B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia, PA [out of print]

    Google Scholar 

  19. Querleu D, Morrow CP (2008) Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol 9:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The Colpo-Probe™ is manufactured by Apple Medical Corporation. Refer to http://www.applemed.com/product.php?product=colpo_probe_vaginal_fornix_deliniator for specific product information

  21. The NeatClose™ is an automated laprascopic port closure device developed by NeatStitch, www.NeatStitch.com

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cecelia Boardman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boardman, C., Huggins, A. & Hull, K. Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy procedural guide. J Robotic Surg 5, 181–187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0252-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0252-0

Keywords

Navigation