The performance of thermal interface materials in the form of core sheets coated on both sides with a thermal paste is numerically modeled by finite-element analysis. The paste is polyol-ester-based carbon black paste and serves to improve the conformability. Good agreement is found between modeling and experimental results that involve copper proximate surfaces sandwiching the thermal interface material. The core sheets are copper, aluminum, indium, and flexible graphite. Flexible graphite (made from exfoliated graphite) is advantageous in its low elastic modulus, whereas copper and aluminum foils are advantageous in their high thermal conductivity. Indium is advantageous in its low elastic modulus compared with copper or aluminum and in its high thermal conductivity compared with flexible graphite. Among the four types of core sheet with identical thickness, coated indium foil gives the best performance for the range of foil thickness of 6 μm to 112 μm for the case of smooth (0.01 μm roughness) proximate surfaces and 117 μm to 320 μm for the case of rough (15 μm roughness) proximate surfaces. Aluminum foil gives the best performance for the thickness range of 112 μm to 2000 μm in the case of smooth proximate surfaces. For thicknesses below these ranges, flexible graphite performs the best. For thicknesses above these ranges, copper foil performs the best.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- q x :
-
heat flow rate in the x direction (W)
- q y :
-
heat flow rate in the y direction (W)
- k :
-
thermal conductivity (W/m K)
- A :
-
area perpendicular to the heat flow direction (m2)
- T :
-
temperature (K)
- x, y:
-
distance in the horizontal and vertical directions (m)
- A C :
-
area of the 1 inch × 1 inch copper block (m2)
- k C :
-
thermal conductivity of copper (W/m K)
- T1, T2, T3, T4:
-
temperatures read by thermo couples 1 to 4 (K)
- ΔT :
-
temperature difference between T 1 and T 2 or between T 3 and T 4 (K)
- T A :
-
temperature at the top surface of the thermal interface material (K)
- T D :
-
temperature at the bottom surface of the thermal interface material (K)
- d A :
-
distance between thermocouples T 1 and T 2 (i.e., 25 mm)
- d B :
-
distance between thermocouple T 2 and the top surface of the thermal interface material (i.e., 5 mm)
- d C :
-
distance between thermocouples T 3 and T 4 (i.e., 25 mm)
- d A :
-
distance between thermocouple T 3 and the bottom surface of the thermal interface material (i.e., 5 mm)
- θ:
-
thermal resistivity (m2 K/W)
- TCC:
-
thermal contact conductance (W/m2 K)
References
C. Lin and D.D.L. Chung, J. Mater. Sci. 42, 9245 (2007).
C. Lin and D.D.L. Chung, Carbon 45, 2922 (2007).
C. Leong, Y. Aoyagi, and D.D.L. Chung, Carbon 44, 435 (2006).
C. Leong, Y. Aoyagi, and D.D.L. Chung, J. Electron. Mater. 34, 1336 (2005).
C. Leong and D.D.L. Chung, Carbon 42, 2323 (2004).
C. Leong and D.D.L. Chung, Carbon 41, 2459 (2003).
C. Lin, T.A. Howe, and D.D.L. Chung, J. Electron. Mater. 36, 659 (2007).
T.A. Howe, C.-K. Leong, and D.D.L. Chung, J. Electron. Mater. 35, 1628 (2006).
Y. Xu, C. Leong, and D.D.L. Chung, J. Electron. Mater. 36, 1181 (2007).
H. Huang, C. Liu, Y. Wu, and S. Fan, Adv. Mater. 17, 1652 (2005).
C. Lin and D.D.L. Chung, J. Electron. Mater. 37, 1698 (2008).
A. Yu, P. Ramesh, M.E. Itkis, E. Bekyarova, and R.C. Haddon, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 7565 (2007).
P.P.S.S. Abadi, C.-K. Leong, and D.D.L. Chung, J. Electron. Mater. 38, 175 (2009).
R. Prasher, Proc. IEEE 94, 1571 (2006).
E.E. Marotta, S.J. Mazzuca, and J. Norley, IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Tech. 28, 102 (2005).
S. Shaikh, K. Lafdi, and E. Silverman, Carbon 45, 695 (2007).
C.-P. Chiu, G.L. Solbrekken, and Y.D. Chung, Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Management and Management Symp. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1997), p. 57.
R.A. Shaik, A.N. Beall, and A. Razani, Heat Transfer Eng. 22, 41 (2001).
K. Zhang, M.M.F. Yuen, N. Wang, J.Y. Miao, D.G.W. Xiao, and H.B. Fan, Proc. 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conf. (San Diego, CA, 2006), p. 177.
R. Schacht, D. May, B. Wunderle, O. Wittler, A. Gollhardt, B. Michel, and H. Reichl, Proc. 12th Therminic 2006 (Nice, Côte d’Azur, France, 2006).
D.D.L. Chung, J. Mater. Sci. 39, 2645 (2004).
R.L. Webb and J.P. Gwinn, Proc. ITherm (2002), p. 671.
F. Hua, C. Deppisch, and T. Fitzgerald, Adv. Microelectron. 16 (2006).
M.G. Cooper, B.B. Mike, and M.M. Yovanovich, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 12, 279 (1969).
J.A. Greenwood and J.B.P. Williamson, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 295, 300 (1966).
C. Lin and D.D.L. Chung, Carbon 47, 295 (2009).
A. Buch, Short Handbook of Metal Elements Properties and Elastic Properties of Pure Metals (Warsaw: Krzysztof Biesaga, 2005), pp. 35–42.
I. Michio and F.Y. Kang, Carbon Materials Science and Engineering—From Fundamentals to Applications (Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006), p. 335.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pour Shahid Saeed Abadi, P., Chung, D.D.L. Numerical Modeling of the Performance of Thermal Interface Materials in the Form of Paste-Coated Sheets. J. Electron. Mater. 40, 1490–1500 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1630-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1630-0