Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of deterministic and geostatistical interpolation techniques for mapping meteorological variables at large watershed scales

  • Research Article - Hydrology
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 January 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

The widely scattered pattern of meteorological stations in large watersheds and remote locations, along with a need to estimate meteorological data for point sites or areas where little or no data have been recorded, has encouraged the development and implementation of spatial interpolation techniques. The various interpolation techniques featured in GIS software allow for the extraction of this new information from spatially distinct point data. Since no one interpolation method can be accurate in all regions, each method must be evaluated prior to each geographically distinct application. Many methods have been used for interpolating minimum temperature (\(T_{ \min }\)), maximum temperature (\(T_{ \max }\)) and precipitation data; however, only a few methods have been used in the Zayandeh-Rud River basin, Iran, and no comparison of methods has ever been carried out in the area. The accuracies of six spatial interpolation methods [Inverse Distance Weighting, Natural Neighbor (NN), Regularized Spline, Tension Spline, Ordinary Kriging, Universal Kriging] were compared in this study simultaneously, and the best method for mapping monthly precipitation and temperature extremes was determined in a large semi-arid watershed with high temperature and rainfall variation. A cross-validation technique and long-term (1970–2014) average monthly \(T_{ \min }\), \(T_{ \max }\) and precipitation data from meteorological stations within the basin were used to identify the best interpolation method for each variable dataset. For \(T_{ \min }\), Kriging (Gaussian) proved to be the most accurate interpolation method (MAE = 1.827 °C), whereas, for \(T_{ \max }\) and precipitation the NN method performed best (MAE = 1.178 °C and 0.5241 mm, respectively). Accordingly, these variable-optimized interpolation methods were used to define spatial patterns of newly generated climatic maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 02 January 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes: the word “parameter” must be replaced with the word “variable” in the whole article.

References

  • Agnew MD, Palutikof JP (2000) GIS-based construction of baseline climatologies for the Mediterranean using terrain variables. Clim Res 14(2):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonić O, Križan J, Marki A, Bukovec D (2001) Spatio-temporal interpolation of climatic variables over large region of complex terrain using neural networks. Ecol Model 138(1–3):255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attorre F, Alfo M, De Sanctis M, Francesconi F, Bruno F (2007) Comparison of interpolation methods for mapping climatic and bioclimatic variables at regional scale. Int J Climatol 27(13):1825–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad PV, Swift L, Collins F, Régnière J (1998) Measured and predicted air temperatures at basin to regional scales in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Agric For Meteorol 91(3–4):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Creating continuous surfaces from point data. In: Burrough PA, Goodchild MF, McDonnell RA, Witzer P, Worboys M (eds) Principles of geographic information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (2000) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Courault D, Monestiez P (1999) Spatial interpolation of air temperature according to atmospheric circulation patterns in southeast France. Int J Climatol J R Meteorol Soc 19(4):365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das M, Hazra A, Sarkar A, Bhattacharya S, Banik P (2017) Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of weekly rainfall in West Bengal, India. MAUSAM 68(1):41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis BM (1987) Uses and abuses of cross-validation in geostatistics. Math Geol 19:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Amorim Borges P, Franke J, Da Anunciação YMT, Weiss H, Bernhofer C (2016) Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of precipitation distribution in Distrito Federal, Brazil. Theor Appl Climatol 123(1–2):335–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Jahani S (2013) Spatial interpolation of monthly and annual rainfall in northeast of Iran. Meteorol Atmos Phys 122:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson R, Marks D (1997) Daily air temperature interpolated at high spatial resolution over a large mountainous region. Clim Res 8(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan S (2009) A comparison of interpolation methods for producing digital elevation models at the field scale. Earth Surf Process Landf 34(3):366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslamian S, Safavi HR, Gohari A, Sajjadi M, Raghibi V, Zareian MJ (2017) Climate change impacts on some hydrological variables in the Zayandeh-Rud River Basin, Iran. Reviving the dying giant. Springer, Cham, pp 201–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fadavi G, Bazarafshan J (2016) Comparative study of regional estimation methods for daily maximum temperature (a case study of the Isfahan province). J Soil Water 29(2):504–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadavi G, Bazarafshan J, Ghahreman N (2016) Comparison of different regional estimation methods for daily minimum temperature (a case study of Isfahan province). J Agric Meteorol 3(2):14–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke R (1982) Smooth interpolation of scattered data by local thin plate splines. Comput Math Appl 8(4):237–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garen DC, Marks D (2005) Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results. J Hydrol 315(1–4):126–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenauer H, Merganicova K, Petritsch R, Pietsch SA, Thornton PE (2003) Validating daily climate interpolations over complex terrain in Austria. Agric For Meteorol 119(1–2):87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis CH, Stuart N (2001) A comparison among strategies for interpolating maximum and minimum daily air temperatures. Part II: the interaction between number of guiding variables and the type of interpolation method. J Appl Meteorol 40(6):1075–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Torabi S, Araghinejad S (2007) Case study of monthly regional rainfall evaluation by spatiotemporal geostatistical method. J Hydrol Eng 12(1):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisaka M, Monicah Mucheru-Muna O, Ngetich FK, Mugwe J, Mugendi D, Mairura F, Shisanya C, Makokha GL (2016) Potential of deterministic and geostatistical rainfall interpolation under high rainfall variability and dry spells: case of Kenya’s Central Highlands. Theor Appl Climatol 124(1–2):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivoruchko K, Gotway CA (2004) Creating exposure maps using kriging. Public Health GIS News Info 56:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Madani K, Marino MA (2009) System dynamics analysis for managing Iran’s Zayandeh-Rud River Basin. Water Resour Manage 23:2163–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merwade VM, Maidment DR, Goff JA (2006) Anisotropic considerations while interpolating river channel bathymetry. J Hydrol 331(3–4):731–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitas L, Mitasova H (1988) General variational approach to the interpolation problem. Comput Math Appl 16(12):983–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutua F, Kuria D (2012) A comparison of spatial rainfall estimation techniques: a case study of Nyando River Basin Kenya. J Agric Sci Technol 14(2):149–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM (2000) A methodological approach of climatological modelling of air temperature and precipitation through GIS techniques. Int J Climatol 20(14):1823–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen SS, Dzikowski P, Li G, Griffith D (2001) Interpolation of 1961–97 daily temperature and precipitation data onto Alberta polygons of ecodistrict and soil landscapes of Canada. J Appl Meteorol 40(12):2162–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibson R (1981) A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation. In: Barnet V (ed) Interpreting multivariate data. Wiley, Chicester, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirvin SM, Marsh SE, McClaran MP, Meko DM (2003) Climate spatial variability and data resolution in a semi-arid watershed, south-eastern Arizona. J Arid Environ 54(4):667–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatalovich Z, John Wilson P, Cockburn M (2006) A comparison of Thiessen polygon, kriging, and spline models of potential UV exposure. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 33(3):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190(3–4):214–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ver Hoef JM (1993) Universal kriging for ecological data. In: Goodchild MF, Parks BO, Steyaert LT (eds) Environmental modelling with GIS. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 447–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltz M, Webster R (1990) A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information. J Soil Sci 41(3):473–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamwling A (2003) Accuracy of geostatistical prediction of yearly precipitation in Lower Saxony. J Environmetr 14(7):699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DF, Phillip GM (1987) Neighborhood based interpolation. Geobyte 2(2):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Fabian P, Winterhalter M, Zhao M (2001) Forest climatology: estimation and use of daily climatological data for Bavaria, Germany. Agric For Meteorol 106(2):87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Gu X, Yin S, Shao J, Cui Y, Zhang Q, Niu Y (2016) Geostatistical interpolation model selection based on ArcGIS and spatio-temporal variability analysis of groundwater level in piedmont plains, northwest China. SpringerPlus 5(1):425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Wang J, Li Q (2018) A new method for temperature spatial interpolation based on sparse historical stations. J Climate 31(5):1757–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zareian MJ, Eslamian S, Safavi HR (2015) A modified regionalization weighting approach for climate change impact assessment at watershed scale. Theor Appl Climatol 122:497–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Amin Amini.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: the word parameter was changed to the word variable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amini, M.A., Torkan, G., Eslamian, S. et al. Analysis of deterministic and geostatistical interpolation techniques for mapping meteorological variables at large watershed scales. Acta Geophys. 67, 191–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0226-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0226-y

Keywords

Navigation