Abstract
Water resources are under increased pressure in almost all parts of the world. In such circumstances, it is also common to have conflicts between different water sectors (for instance, tourism vs. environmental use; municipal and industrial supply vs. agricultural water use, etc.), and interest groups. In most cases, related problems could be efficiently solved through public participation and the involvement of stakeholders. Traditional public participation in water management is mostly focused on problem-solving, rather than on other important contexts such as: stakeholders’ understanding of the problem; motivation (willingness) to participate; preferences; understanding the solving methodology; and expectations that the participatory process will lead to the desired solution(s). An approach that has been proven to successfully take into account most of these concerns in managing water-related participatory problems is known as Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM). In this paper, the authors use GTM to analyse data collected within the previous study of stakeholders’ selection and prioritization in managing the water resources of the Krivaja River basin in Serbia. Extensive data sets include detailed information about stakeholders, a description of the catchment characteristics, and the perception of public participation provided by questionnaires distributed and collected within a six-month period. The results obtained by GTM show that there are more similarities with results obtained in developing countries in terms of the distinction between official and non-official attitudes and views, the objectives of PP and the justification for introducing PP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggestam F (2014) Wetland restoration and the involvement of stakeholders: an analysis based on value-perspectives. Landsc Res 39:680–697
Albrecht J (2016) Legal framework and criteria for effectively coordinating public participation under the floods directive and water framework directive: European requirements and German transposition. Environ Sci Pol 55(2):368–375
Al-Najar FO, Ushijima K, Funamizu N (2013) The perception of the public participation approach applied to water management in Jordan. Water Policy 15:1078–1093
Bajčetić R, Srđević B, Srđević Z, Blagojević B, Zoranović T (2015) Participativno odlučivanje o prioritetima raspodele voda u slivu reke Krivaje u Vojvodini. Vodoprivreda 47(273–278):287–293 (in Serbian)
Benson D, Fritsch O, Cook H, Schmid M (2014) Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: processes, communities, outputs and outcomes. Land Use Policy 38:213–222
Challies E, Newig J, Thaler T, Kochskämper E, Levin-Keitel M (2016) Participatory and collaborative governance for sustainable flood risk management: an emerging research agenda. Environ Sci Pol 55(2):275–280
Corbin JM, Strauss AL (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13:3–21
De Vente J, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Valente S, Newig J (2016) How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecol Soc 21(2):24
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy [water framework directive]. Off J Eur Communities L 327:1–72
Furukawa K (2013) Case studies for urban wetlands restoration and management in Japan. Ocean Coast Manag 81:97–102
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago
Hoornbeek J, Hansen E, Ringquist E, Carlson R (2013) Implementing water pollution policy in the United States: total maximum daily loads and collaborative watershed management. Soc Nat Resour 26(4):420–436
Ijjas I, Botond K (2004) Participation and Social Learning in the Implementation of the WFD in Agricultural Water Management: Stakeholder Workshops Report. AWP5 Report of the Harmonicop Project http://www.harmonicop.info/_files/_down/Hungarian%20National%20SH%20Workshop%20Report.pdf
Jager N, Challies E, Kochskämper E, Newig J, Benson D, Blackstock K, Collins K, Ernst A, Evers M, Feichtinger J, Fritsch O, Gooch G, Grund W, Hedelin B, Hernández-Mora N, Hüesker F, Huitema D, Irvine K, Klinke A, Lange L, Loupsans D, Lubell M, Maganda C, Matczak P, Parés M, Saarikoski H, Slavíková L, van der Arend S, von Korff Y (2016) Transforming European water governance? Participation and River Basin management under the EU water framework directive in 13 member states. Water 8(4):156. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040156
Knigge LD, Cope M (2006) Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environ Plan A 38(11):2021–2037
Larson KL, Lach D (2008) Participants and non-participants of place-based groups: an assessment of attitudes and implications for public participation in water resource management. J Environ Manag 88(4):817–830
Martin PY, Turner BA (1986) Grounded theory and organizational research. J Appl Behav Sci 22(2):141–157
Mayer A, Vivoni ER, Kossak D et al (2017) Participatory modeling workshops in a water-Stressed Basin result in gains in modeling capacity but reveal disparity in water resources management priorities. Water Resour Manag 31:4731–4744
Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179–197
Mutshewa A (2010) The use of information by environmental planners: a qualitative study using grounded theory methodology. Inf Process Manag 46(2):212–232
Panten K, van Heel BF, Fliervoet JM, Riyan JG, van den Born (2018) Cross-border collaboration in river management: views on participation in a Dutch-German case study. Water Resour Manag 32(2):4063–4078
Prokopy LS, Floress K (2011) Measuring the citizen effect: what does good citizen involvement look like? In: Morton LW, Brown SS (eds) Pathways for getting to better water quality: the citizen effect. Springer, New York, pp 83–93
Rault PK, Jeffrey P (2008) On the appropriateness of public participation in integrated water resources management: some grounded insights from the Levant. The Integrated Assessment Journal 8(2):69–106
Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2417–2431
Ruiz-Villaverde A, García-Rubio MA (2017) Public participation in European water management: from theory to practice. Water Resour Manag 31:2479–2495
Schramm VB, Schramm F (2018) An approach for supporting problem structuring in water resources management and planning. Water Resour Manag 32(9):2955–2968
Slavíková L, Jílková J (2011) Implementing the public participation principle into water Management in the Czech Republic: a critical analysis. Reg Stud 45(4):545–557
UNECE (1993) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Second Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” in Lucerne, Switzerland (see: www.unece.org/env/efe/historyofefe/history.en2011_2.html)
UNECE (2013) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Guide to Public Participation under the Protocol on Water and Health, available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/publications/PWH_public_participation/GuidePublicParticipationPWH_WEB_EN.pdf
United Nations (1992) Text of the Rio Declaration, available at: www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm
Urquhart C, Lehmann H, Myers MD (2010) Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inf Syst J 20:357–381
Waylen KA, Blackstock KL, Marshall KB, Dunglinson J (2015) Participation–prescription tension in natural resource management: the case of diffuse pollution in Scottish water management. Environ Policy 25(2):111–124
Wesselink A, Paavola J (2011) Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners' perspectives. Environ Plan A 43:2688–2704
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Matsumae International Foundation, which provided a 3-month fellowship for Dr. Zorica Srđević’s stay at the Hokkaido University, and by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia under the grant 174003 (2011–2016) - Theory and application of Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria decision making under conditions of risk and uncertainty (individual and group context).
A previous shorter version of the paper was presented in the 10th World Congress of EWRA “Panta Rei” Athens, Greece, 5-9 July 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srdjevic, Z., Funamizu, N., Srdjevic, B. et al. Public Participation in Water Management of Krivaja River, Serbia: Understanding the Problem through Grounded Theory Methodology. Water Resour Manage 32, 5081–5092 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2132-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2132-0