Abstract
In recognition of the value of biodiversity for cities and citizens, a number of international programs have been designed to help municipal governments sustain, protect, and augment the biodiversity and ecosystem services within their jurisdictions. A key component of these programs is public engagement, where citizens assume a more active role in maintaining urban biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Yet, there are few studies which have as their focus public knowledge of the importance of nature, biodiversity, and ecosystem services in cities. To these ends, this study was conducted to develop a better understanding of how the public understands and interacts with urban biodiversity, particularly in comparison to subject matter experts. Using topics generated from expert interviews and the literature, an interview guide was developed for the general public, structured around the general themes of a definition of urban biodiversity, as well as the perceived benefits, costs, and threats related to urban biodiversity. While there were similarities in the responses of citizens and experts, some differences did emerge in terms of accounting for specific urban ecosystems, acceptable interventions to support and enhance biodiversity, and the character and extent of the cultural services derived from urban nature. Insights from this work can be used to inform education and information efforts for the public, as well as raise awareness among city planners and nature professionals of the array of urban ecosystem services recognized and made use of by the public.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The University of Calgary’s Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board reviewed and approved this research study; informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to conducting the interviews.
References
Alberta Parks (2015) Natural regions and subregions of Alberta. A framework for Alberta’s Parks. Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation, Edmonton, pp 72. https://www.albertaparks.ca/media/6256258/natural-regions-subregions-of-alberta-a-framework-for-albertas-parks-booklet.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Amel E, Manning C, Scott B, Koger S (2017) Beyond the roots of human inaction: fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356:275–279
Aronson MFJ et al (2017) Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front Ecol Environ 15:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1480
Baur JWR, Tynon JF, Ries P, Rosenberger RS (2014) Urban parks and attitudes about ecosystem services: does park use matter? J Park Recreat Adm 32(4):19–34
Beery T, Jørgensen KA (2018) Children in nature: sensory engagement and the experience of biodiversity. Environ Educ Res 24:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250149
Beninde J, Veith M, Hochkirch A, Haddad N (2015) Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecol Lett 18:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12427
Bessette DL, Mayer LA, Cwik B, Vezér M, Keller K, Lempert RJ, Tuana N (2017) Building a values-informed mental model for New Orleans climate risk management. Risk Anal 37:1993–2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12743
Blaustein R (2013) Urban biodiversity gains new converts. BioScience 63:72–77
Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischoff B, Read D (1994) What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental Models. Risk Anal 14:959–970
Buchel S, Frantzeskaki N (2015) Citizens’ voice: a case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosyst Serv 12:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.014
Buijs AE, Elands BHM (2013) Does expertise matter? An in-depth understanding of people’s structure of thoughts on nature and its management implications. Biol Conserv 168:184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.020
Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, Agrimi M, Portoghesi L, Semenzato P, Sanesi G (2015) Go greener feel better? The positive effects of biodiveristy on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 134:221–228
Chowdhury PD, Haque CE, Driedger SM (2012) Public versus expert knowledge and perceptions of climate change-induced heat wave risk: a modified mental model approach. J Risk Res 15:149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.601319
City of Calgary (2014) Biodiversity report. The City of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta. http://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/Planning-and-Operations/Biodiversity.aspx. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
City of Calgary (2017a) Calgary’s biodiversity: sharing our urban spaces with wildlife. http://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/Planning-and-Operations/Biodiversity.aspx. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
City of Calgary (2017b) City releases 2017 census results. City of Calgary, Alberta. https://newsroom.calgary.ca/city-releases-2017-census-results/. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Colding J, Barthel S (2013) The potential of 'Urban Green Commons' in the resilience building of cties. Ecol Econ 86:156–166
Crabtree BF, Miller WL (1999) Using codes and code manuals: a template organizing style of interpretation. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds) Doing qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks
Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between. Self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience 62:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
Dearborn DC, Kark S (2009) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:432–440
Dennis M, James P (2016) User participation in urban green commons: exploring the links between access, voluntarism, biodiversity and well being. Urban For Urban Green 15:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.009
Dickinson DC, Hobbs RJ (2017) Cultural ecosystem services: characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosyst Serv 25:179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.014
Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel SN, van der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Blignaut JN, Gómez-Baggethun E, Nowak DJ, Kronenberg J, de Groot R (2015) Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
Ferreira CSS, Walsh RPD, Ferreira AJD (2018) Degradation in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 5:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.04.001
Fischer A, Young JC (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv 136:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024
Fischhoff B, Brewer NT, Downs JT (2011) Introduction. In: Communicating risks and benefits: an evidence-based user’s guide. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/UCM268069.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Fuller RA, Irvine KN (2010) Interactions between people and nature in urban environments. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Urban ecology. Ecological reviews. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 134–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778483.008
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394
Gardner GT, Stern PC (2008) The short list: the most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Environment 50(5):12–25. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.12-25
Gill N, Waitt G, Head L (2009) Local engagements with urban bushland: moving beyond bounded practice for urban biodiversity management. Landsc Urban Plan 93:184–193
Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 22:959–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2009) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98
Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Baj X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760
Grimm NB, Pickett STA, Hale RL, Cadenasso ML (2017) Does the ecological concept of disturbance have utility in urban social–ecological–technological systems? Ecosyst Health Sustainability 3(1):e01255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1255
Haaland C, van den Bosch CK (2015) Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For Urban Green 14:760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
Hettiarachchi M, Morrison TH, McAlpine C (2015) Forty-three years of Ramsar and urban wetlands. Glob Environ Chang 32:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.009
Hoyle H, Hitchmough J, Jorgensen A (2017) All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landsc Urban Plan 164:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011
Hunter LM, Brehm J (2003) Qualitative insight into public knowledge of, and concern with, biodiversity. Hum Ecol 31:309–320
Ikin K, le Roux DS, Rayner L, Villaseñor NR, Eyles K, Gibbons P, Manning AD, Lindenmayer DB (2015) Key lessons for achieving biodiversity-sensitive cities and towns. Ecol Manag Restor 16:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12180
imagineCALGARY (2013) Calgary's plan for long range urban sustainability. imagineCalgary, Calgary
Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York
Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
Knapp S, Haase D, Klotz S, Schwarz N (2018) Do urban biodiversity and urban ecosystem services go hand in hand, or do we just hope it is that easy? In: Kabisch S et al (eds) Urban transformations: sustainable urban development through resource efficiency, quality of life and resilience. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1_16
LaPoint S, Balkenhol N, Hale J, Sadler J, Ree R, Evans K (2015) Ecological connectivity research in urban areas. Funct Ecol 29:868–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12489
Larson LR, Keith SJ, Fernandez M, Hallo JC, Shafer CS, Jennings V (2016) Ecosystem services and urban greenways: what’s the public’s perspective? Ecosyst Serv 22:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.004
Lerman SB, Turner VK, Bang C (2012) Homeowner associations as a vehicle for promoting native urban biodiversity. Ecol Soc 17:45. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05175-170445
Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E (2008) How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum Ecol 36:731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1
Livingstone SW, Cadotte MW, Isaac ME (2018) Ecological engagement determines ecosystem service valuation: a case study from rouge National Urban Park in Toronto, Canada. Ecosyst Serv 30:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.006
Local Action for Biodiversity (2008) Durban commitment. http://archive.iclei.org/index.php?id=12224. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Loss SR, Will T, Loss SS, Marra PP (2014) Bird–building collisions in the United States: estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. Condor 116:8–23. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-13-090.1
Lovell R, Wheeler BW, Higgins SL, Irvine KN, Depledge MH (2014) A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B 17:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2013.856361
Lundgren RE, McMakin AH (2008) Risk communication: a handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470480120.ch1
Lyytimaki J, Petersen LK, Normander B, Bezak P (2008) Nature as nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyles. Environ Sci 5:161–172
Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Warber SL (2014) Examining group walks in nature and multiple aspects of well-being: a large-scale study. Ecopsychology 6:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2014.0027
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013
Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Muller N, Werner P (2010) Urban biodiversity and the case for implementing the convention on biological diversity in towns and cities. In: Muller N, Werner P, Kelcey JG (eds) Urban biodiversity and design. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Muratet A, Pellegrini P, Dufour A-B, Arrif T, Chiron F (2015) Perception and knowledge of plant diversity among urban park users. Landsc Urban Plan 137:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.003
Musacchio LR (2013) Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 28:1025–1038
Nilon CH, Aronson MFJ, Cilliers SS, Dobbs C, Frazee LJ, Goddard MA, O’Neill KM, Roberts D, Stander EK, Werner P, Winter M, Yocom KP (2017) Planning for the future of urban biodiversity: a global review of City-scale initiatives. BioScience 67:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix012
Norton BA, Evans KL, Warren PH (2016) Urban biodiversity and landscape ecology: patterns, processes and planning. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 1:178–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-016-0018-5
Novacek MJ (2008) Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:11571–11578
O’Brien K (2015) Political agency: the key to tackling climate change. Science 350:1170–1171
Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y (2010) The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across. Japan. Environ Health Prev Med 15:18–26
Pett TJ, Shwartz A, Irvine KN, Dallimer M, Davies ZG (2016) Unpacking the people–biodiversity paradox: a conceptual framework. BioScience 66:576–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw036
Pham TT, Moeliono M, Brockhaus M, Le DN, Wong G, Le TM (2014) Local preferences and strategies for effective, efficient, and equitable distribution of PES revenues in Vietnam: lessons for REDD+. Hum Ecol 42:885–899
Prévot A-C, Servais V, Piron A (2016) Scientist and non-scientists share a diversity of dimensions in their relations to urban nature. Urban Ecosyst 19:1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0565-x
Pyle RM (1993) The thunder tree: lessons from an urban wildland. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Qiu L, Lindberg S, Nielsen AB (2013) Is biodiversity attractive?—on-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 119:136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007
Riechers M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T (2016) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosyst Serv 17:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007
Rooney RC, Foote L, Krogman N, Pattison JK, Wilson MJ, Bayley SE (2015) Replacing natural wetlands with stormwater management facilities: biophysical and perceived social values. Water Res 73:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.035
Rudd H, Vala J, Schaefer V (2002) Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10:368–375
Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Khakee A (2006) Urban comprehensive planning – identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landsc Urban Plan 75:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.016
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Cities and biodiversity outlook. Montreal, pp 64. https://www.cbd.int/doc/health/cbo-action-policy-en.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:16083–16088
Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH (2010) Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. BioScience 60:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6
Shwartz A, Turbé A, Julliard R, Simon L, Prévot A-C (2014a) Outstanding challenges for urban conservation research and action. Glob Environ Chang 28:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.002
Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014b) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.009
Snell S (2015) Our BiodiverCity: Calgary’s 10-Year Biodiversity Strategic Plan. Calgary, Alberta. http://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/Planning-and-Operations/Biodiversity.aspx. Accessed 12 Nov 2018
Soga M, Gaston KJ (2016) Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ 14:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
Southon GE, Jorgensen A, Dunnett N, Hoyle H, Evans KL (2018) Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: cues, accuracy and well-being impacts. Landsc Urban Plan 172:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002
Sterling EJ, Betley E, Sigouin A, Gomez A, Toomey A, Cullman G, Malone C, Pekor A, Arengo F, Blair M, Filardi C, Landrigan K, Porzecanski AL (2017) Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 209:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008
Stronbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS (2013) Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landsc Urban Plan 114:69–79
Sushinsky JR, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Gill TK, Fuller RA (2012) How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts? Glob Chang Biol 19:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12055
Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27:237–246
Threlfall CG et al (2017) Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. J Appl Ecol 54:1874–1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12876
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2013) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision, highlights. United Nations, New York. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/WUP2011_Report.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 18
Vietz GJ, Rutherfurd ID, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ (2016) Thinking outside the channel: challenges and opportunities for protection and restoration of stream morphology in urbanizing catchments. Landsc Urban Plan 145:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.004
von Döhren P, Haase D (2015) Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol Indic 52:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027
Whitburn J, Linklater WL, Milfont TL (2018) Exposure to urban nature and tree planting are related to pro-environmental behavior via connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes. Environ Behav. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517751009
Wilson R (2008) Nature and young children. Routledge, London
Wilson RS, Tucker M, Hooker NH, LeJeune JT, Doonan D (2008) Perceptions and beliefs about weed management: perspectives of Ohio grain and produce farmers. Weed Technol 22:339–350
Wyse SV, Beggs JR, Burns BR, Stanley MC (2015) Protecting trees at an individual level provides insufficient safeguard for urban forests. Landsc Urban Plan 141:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.006
Young JC, Waylen KA, Sarkki S, Albon S, Bainbridge I, Balian E, Davidson J, Edwards D, Fairley R, Margerison C, McCracken D, Owen R, Quine CP, Stewart-Roper C, Thompson D, Tinch R, van den Hove S, Watt A (2014) Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another. Biodivers Conserv 23:387–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0
Acknowledgements
This research was made possible by a University of Calgary and City of Calgary Urban Alliance Seed Grant. I thank the subject matter experts and citizens who participated in this study, as well as colleagues Dr. Dianne Draper, Stephen Snell, and Rebecca Tyssen. The author also wishes to thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful and constructive feedback on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell-Arvai, V. Engaging urban nature: improving our understanding of public perceptions of the role of biodiversity in cities. Urban Ecosyst 22, 409–423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0821-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0821-3