Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic collusion in auctions with externalities

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a first-price auction preceded by a negotiation stage with complete information, during which bidders may form a bidding ring. We prove that in the absence of externalities, the grand cartel forms in equilibrium, allowing ring members to gain the auctioned object for a minimal price. However, identity-dependent externalities may lead to the formation of small rings, as often observed in practice. Potential ring members may condition their participation on high transfer payments as a compensation for their expected (negative) externalities if the ring forms. The cartel may therefore profitably exclude these bidders, although risking tougher competition in the auction. We also analyze ring (in)efficiency in the presence of externalities, showing that a ring may prefer sending an inefficient member to the auction, if the efficient member exerts threatening externalities on bidders outside the ring, which in turn leads to a higher winning price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajari P., Ye L. (2003) Deciding between competition and collusion. Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 971–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biran, O. (2007). Efficiency and the final consumer in resale markets with externalities. Master Thesis, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.

  • Biran, O. (2011). Mécanismes d’échange en présence d’externalités. PhD Thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine.

  • Biran O., Forges F. (2011) Core-stable rings in auctions with independent private values. Games and Economic Behavior 73: 52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F. (1996) Sequential formation of coalitions in games with externalities and fixed payoff division. Games and Economic Behavior 14: 90–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F., Gomes A. (2006) Contracting with externalities and outside options. Journal of Economic Theory 127: 172–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud B., Jehiel P. (1998) Collusion in auctions with externalities. RAND Journal of Economics 29: 680–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham D. A., Marshall R. C. (1987) Collusive bidder behavior at single-object second-price and English auctions. The Journal of Political Economy 95: 1217–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeringer G. (2004) Equilibrium binding agreements: A comment. Journal of Economic Theory 117: 140–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks K., Porter R., Tan G. (2008) Bidding rings and the winner’s curse. RAND Journal of Economics 39: 1018–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehiel P., Moldovanu B. (1996) Strategic nonparticipation. RAND Journal of Economics 27: 84–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehiel P., Moldovanu B. (1999) Resale markets and the assignment of property rights. Review of Economic Studies 66: 971–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehiel P., Moldovanu B., Stacchetti E. (1996) How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. American Economic Review 86: 814–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehiel P., Moldovanu B., Stacchetti E. (1999) Multidimensional mechanism design for auctions with externalities. Journal of Economic Theory 85: 258–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailath G.J., Zemsky P. (1991) Collusion in second price auctions with heterogeneous bidders. Games and Economic Behavior 3: 467–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall R. C., Marx L. M. (2007) Bidder collusion. Journal of Economic Theory 133: 374–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. (1992) Bidding rings. The American Economic Review 82: 579–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter R., Zona D. (1993) Detection of bid rigging in procurement auctions. Journal of Political Economy 101: 518–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter R., Zona D. (1999) Ohio school milk markets: An analysis of bidding. RAND Journal of Economics 30: 263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D., Vohra R. (1997) Equilibrium binding agreements. Journal of Economic Theory 73: 30–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D., Vohra R. (1999) A theory of endogenous coalition structures. Games and Economic Behavior 26: 286–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D., Vohra R. (2001) Coalitional power and public goods. The Journal of Political Economy 109: 1355–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson M. S. (1985) Collusion and the choice of auction. The RAND Journal of Economics 16: 141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omer Biran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biran, O. Strategic collusion in auctions with externalities. Theory Decis 75, 117–136 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9330-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9330-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation