Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Masculinity Ideology, Income Disparity, and Romantic Relationship Quality Among Men with Higher Earning Female Partners

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research assessed factors that may affect men’s heterosexual romantic relationships in which their partner earns a greater income. Forty-seven men from the United States completed measures that assessed masculinity ideology, the importance of the partner’s greater income, and romantic relationship quality. We examined whether the perceived importance of the income disparity mediated the relationship between men’s masculinity ideology and the quality of their romantic relationships. Using multiple regression analyses to test for mediation, results showed the relationship between masculinity ideology and romantic relationship quality was due in part to the importance one placed on the difference in income. Specifically, men who were more traditional in their masculinity ideology and have higher earning female partners were more likely to have poor quality romantic relationships in part because such men view the disparity in income as having importance. Conversely, results showed men who were more nontraditional in their masculinity were more likely to perceive the disparity in income as having little or no importance and have high romantic relationship quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). American couples: Money, work, and sex. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood, what it’s done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–49). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 168–182. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, S. M., & Ward, A. Z. (2005). Men’s conformity to traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 254–263. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.4.254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Willis, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn D., & Fry, R. (2010, January 19). Women, men and the new economics of marriage. Pew Research Center: A Social & Demographic Trends Report. Washington, DC.

  • David, D., & Brannon, R. (1976). The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaghue, N., & Fallon, B. J. (2003). Gender-role self-stereotyping and the relationship between equity and satisfaction in close relationships. Sex Roles, 48, 217–230. doi:10.1023/A:1022869203900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Female Power. (2009, December 30). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/15174418?story_id=15174418.

  • Fogarty, T. (1979). The distancer and the pursuer. The Family, 7, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N. A., & Tinsley, H. E. A. (1997). Work-family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 141–144. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C. (1984). The changing definition of masculinity. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garthoeffner, J. L., Henry, C. S., & Robinson, L. C. (1993). The modified interpersonal relationships scale: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 73, 995–1004. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3.995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grable, J. E., Britt, S., & Cantrell, J. (2007). An exploratory study of the role financial satisfaction has on the thought of subsequent divorce. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36, 130–150. doi:10.1177/1077727X07309284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, W. A. (1990). Husband’s masculinity, wife’s power and marital conflict. Social Behavior and Personality, 18, 207–216. doi:10.2224/sbp.1990.18.2.207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I. M. (1995). Messages men hear. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiselica, M. S., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2010). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male strengths: The positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 276–287. doi:10.1037/a0021159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., & Richmond, K. (2007). A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 130–146. doi:10.3149/jms.1502.130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., Hirsch, L., Celentano, E., Cozza, T., Hill, S., MacEachern, M., Marty, N., & Schnedeker, J. (1992). The male role: An investigation of norms and stereotypes. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (vol. 2, pp. 268–294). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. (2002). Exploring the lives of Asian American men: Racial identity, male role norms, gender role conflict, and prejudicial attitudes. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3, 107–118. doi:10.1037//1524-9220.3.2.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, J. B. (1996). Perceptions of negotiating power in dual income couples where the wife earns more in contrast to dual income couples where the husband earns more. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10), 5837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. W., & Pleck, J. H. (2006). Fathers’ care giving and breadwinning: A gender congruence analysis. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 7, 101–112. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.7.2.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. C., & Joshi, S. (2008). Masculine gender role dogmatism and the development of the MGDI. Paper presented at the 116th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Mcgraw, S. L. (2001). Masculinity ideologies, men’s relationship behavior, and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couple relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(3), 1588B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., McCabe, M. P., & Brink, R. B. (2001). Are married couples happier in their relationships than cohabiting couples? Intimacy and relationship factors. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 16, 35–46. doi:10.1080/14681990125384.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M. (1981). Patterns of gender role conflict and strain: Sexism and fear of femininity in men’s lives. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Personnel and Guidance Association, St. Louis.

  • O’Neil, J. M., Helms, B., Gable, R., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. (1986). Gender role conflict scale: College men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335–350. doi:10.1007/BF00287583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01166.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). Changes in wives’ income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 63, 458–472. doi:10.1111/j.1741-737.2001.00458.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rook, K. S., & Pietromonaco, P. (1987). Close relationships: Ties that heal or ties that bind? Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2007). The interpersonal power of feminism: Is feminism good for romantic relationships? Sex Roles, 57, 787–799. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9319-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlein, S., Guerney, B. G., Jr., & Stover, L. (1990). The interpersonal relationships scale. In J. Touliatos, B. F. Perlmutter, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, T. L., Kessler, R. C., & Aseltine, R. H. (1990). Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 423–437. doi:10.1007/BF00938116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siavelis, R. L., & Lamke, L. K. (1992). Instrumentalness and expressiveness: Predictors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 26, 149–159. doi:10.1007/BF00289755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the Seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 825–839. doi:10.2307/351827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “hers” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379. doi:10.1023/A:1025601423031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1995). Health psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5678-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, D. M., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (1996). Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date rape supportive attitudes and sexual aggression in dating situations. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 555–562. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb02292.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011, December). Wives who earn more than their husbands, 1987–2009. Women in the Labor Force: A Databook (p. 78). Report 1034. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2011.pdf.

  • Wade, J. C. (2008). Masculinity ideology, male reference group identity dependence, and African American men’s health related attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 5–16. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C., & Brittan-Powell, C. S. (2001). Men’s attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 42–50. doi:10.1037//1524-9220.2.1.42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C., & Donis, E. (2007). Masculinity ideology, male identity and romantic relationship quality among heterosexual and gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 775–786. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9303-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, T. A. (1985). Supportive functions of relationships. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 61–82). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA

    Patrick Coughlin & Jay C. Wade

Authors
  1. Patrick Coughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jay C. Wade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay C. Wade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coughlin, P., Wade, J.C. Masculinity Ideology, Income Disparity, and Romantic Relationship Quality Among Men with Higher Earning Female Partners. Sex Roles 67, 311–322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0187-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0187-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation